-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow for ssm invoke without client creation #924
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the PR! Code changes LGTM, except one minor thing: could you please add comments to the new functions, following the comment format of the existing functions?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thank you! I'll kick off tests now.
It appears TestDoInBackgroundUntilStopped failed, but trying to read through some of the code I’m not sure if that relates back to this PR. Can you confirm if any action is required on my part for this @brikis98 ? |
I'm not sure, TBH! I know we recently merged some fixes for flaky tests to |
Rebased |
Thanks! I'll kick off tests again. |
Darn, looks like that broke more than the last time! |
Yes, sorry about that. I think it might be caused by some new |
No worries. We've all been there. Just thankful for the fast feedback. Rebased and squashed. |
Thanks! Re-running tests now. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Alright, tests passed! Merging now.
In line with the #797, I had a use case for not creating a client with the other SSM error functions. This PR should keep in line with current functionality, but extend additional WithClient functions to allow for some flexibility.