Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Phase name check #893

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 27, 2024
Merged

Phase name check #893

merged 6 commits into from
Sep 27, 2024

Conversation

ArneTR
Copy link
Member

@ArneTR ArneTR commented Sep 13, 2024

Moving a lot of checks from the runner to the tests.

Also including a more rigid phase check for an allowed syntax.

@ribalba Maybe this helps creating your PR for the frontend schema checker

Copy link

Eco-CI Output:

Label 🖥 avg. CPU utilization [%] 🔋 Total Energy [Joules] 🔌 avg. Power [Watts] Duration [Seconds]
Total Run (incl. overhead) 23.1442 1672.36 3.86 433
Measurement #1 23.0923 1672.36 3.88 431

🌳 CO2 Data:
City: San Jose, Lat: 37.1835, Lon: -121.7714
IP: 52.234.46.144
CO₂ from energy is: 0.461571360 g
CO₂ from manufacturing (embodied carbon) is: 0.123540879 g
Carbon Intensity for this location: 276 gCO₂eq/kWh
SCI: 0.585112 gCO₂eq / pipeline run emitted

@ArneTR ArneTR merged commit 65f956e into main Sep 27, 2024
4 checks passed
@ArneTR ArneTR deleted the phase-name-check branch September 27, 2024 11:38
ArneTR added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2024
* main:
  Authentication in GMT (#872)
  Phase name check (#893)
  Carbondb unique (#877)
  Added DiskIO Reporter (#825)
  Bump pylint from 3.3.0 to 3.3.1 (#913)
  Bump aiohttp from 3.10.5 to 3.10.6 (#912)
  Bump plotext from 5.3.1 to 5.3.2 (#914)
  Bump pandas from 2.2.2 to 2.2.3 (#910)
  Bump plotext from 5.2.8 to 5.3.1 (#909)
  Bump pylint from 3.2.7 to 3.3.0 (#911)
  Bump psycopg-pool from 3.2.2 to 3.2.3 (#901)
  Bump pydantic from 2.9.1 to 2.9.2 (#904)
  Bump fastapi[standard] from 0.114.2 to 0.115.0 (#905)
  Importer for Measurements (#908)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant