Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix electron-builder peer deps #50129

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ravicious
Copy link
Member

#49610 bumped electron-builder, but that package still has peer deps specified in a weird, I think even recursive way, that neither yarn nor pnpm seem to be able to handle properly.

As a result, app-builder-lib wasn't properly resolved to 25.1.8, instead it stayed at 25.1.7. This results in a warning when running pnpm install that app-builder-lib has an unmet peer dep.

I solved this manually by adding app-builder-lib and electron-builder-squirrel-windows to teleterm's package.json, doing pnpm install, and then removing the entries from package.json. Then I re-run pnpm install to verify that everything is correct.

@ravicious ravicious added the no-changelog Indicates that a PR does not require a changelog entry label Dec 12, 2024
@ravicious ravicious requested a review from gzdunek December 12, 2024 09:59
@ravicious ravicious removed the request for review from mvbrock December 12, 2024 10:00
@ravicious ravicious enabled auto-merge December 12, 2024 10:07
@ravicious ravicious requested review from avatus and removed request for timothyb89 December 12, 2024 11:43
@ravicious ravicious added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 12, 2024
Merged via the queue into master with commit 946efc3 Dec 12, 2024
43 checks passed
@ravicious ravicious deleted the r7s/electron-builder-peer-deps branch December 12, 2024 14:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
no-changelog Indicates that a PR does not require a changelog entry size/sm
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants