feat: [#280] Optimize migration command #680
Conversation
| @@ -9,5 +9,5 @@ type Driver interface { | |||
| // Create a new migration file. | |||
| Create(name string) error | |||
| // Run the migrations according to paths. | |||
| Run(paths []string) error | |||
| Run() error | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Implement the paths when removing the sql driver.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Only call the Run method in the Handle method now, don't need to test it, added test cases in drivers.
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Connection The database connection that should be used by the migration. | ||
| func (r *DummyMigration) Connection() string { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Connection is optional.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #680 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 68.93% 69.30% +0.37%
==========================================
Files 189 189
Lines 14477 14571 +94
==========================================
+ Hits 9980 10099 +119
+ Misses 3915 3882 -33
- Partials 582 590 +8 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant changes to the database migration framework. Key modifications include updates to method signatures in interfaces such as Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 29
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (37)
errors/modules.go (1)
16-16: LGTM! The addition ofModuleMigrationis consistent and well-placed.The new constant
ModuleMigrationfollows the established naming convention and value assignment pattern. Its alphabetical placement within the list is appropriate.For future maintenance, consider using a slice of structs or a map to store these module identifiers. This could potentially make it easier to iterate over them programmatically if needed. For example:
var Modules = map[string]string{ "Auth": "auth", "Cache": "cache", // ... other modules ... "Migration": "migration", // ... remaining modules ... }This structure would allow for easier programmatic access and manipulation of the module list if required in the future.
database/migration/default_creator.go (1)
34-37: LGTM! Consider a minor improvement in variable naming.The changes to the
PopulateStubmethod look good and align with the PR objectives. The new signature provides more flexibility and clarity in handling migration stubs.Consider renaming the receiver variable
rto something more descriptive, likedc(for DefaultCreator) orcreator. This would improve code readability:-func (r *DefaultCreator) PopulateStub(stub, signature, table string) string { - stub = strings.ReplaceAll(stub, "DummyMigration", str.Of(signature).Prepend("m_").Studly().String()) - stub = strings.ReplaceAll(stub, "DummySignature", signature) - stub = strings.ReplaceAll(stub, "DummyTable", table) +func (dc *DefaultCreator) PopulateStub(stub, signature, table string) string { + stub = strings.ReplaceAll(stub, "DummyMigration", str.Of(signature).Prepend("m_").Studly().String()) + stub = strings.ReplaceAll(stub, "DummySignature", signature) + stub = strings.ReplaceAll(stub, "DummyTable", table)contracts/database/migration/schema.go (2)
15-15: LGTM: New methods enhance Schema interface functionality.The addition of
GetConnection(),Migrations(),Orm(), andSetConnection()methods improves the capabilities of theSchemainterface. These methods provide better control over database connections, migration management, and ORM access.Suggestion: Consider adding brief documentation comments for each new method to clarify their purpose and usage.
Also applies to: 21-21, 23-23, 27-27
1-31: Summary: Significant changes to Schema interface simplify signatures but require careful error handling consideration.The changes to the
Schemainterface represent a substantial refactoring of the migration framework. While the simplification of method signatures by removing error return types can lead to cleaner code, it necessitates a robust alternative error handling strategy. The addition of new methods enhances the interface's functionality, providing better control over connections, migrations, and ORM access.Key points to address:
- Clarify the new error handling approach for methods that no longer return errors.
- Consider adding documentation for the new methods to improve usability.
- Ensure that these changes are consistently applied across the entire migration framework.
- Verify that all callers of these methods are updated to handle the new signatures and error handling approach.
database/console/migration/migrate_reset_command_test.go (1)
28-30: LGTM: Enhanced mock configuration setup.The new expectations for
mockConfigprovide a more comprehensive test setup by mocking additional configuration details. This change improves the test's robustness and alignment with the actual system behavior.Consider extracting the hardcoded strings (e.g., "migrations", "utf8bm4") into constants at the package level for better maintainability and reusability across tests.
database/console/migration/migrate_status_command_test.go (1)
32-32: LGTM: Improved test migration setup.The change from
createMigrations(driver)tomigration.CreateTestMigrations(driver)is a good improvement. It suggests a more structured and potentially reusable approach to setting up test migrations.Consider adding a comment explaining what
CreateTestMigrationsdoes, especially if it's significantly different from the previouscreateMigrationsfunction. This would enhance the test's readability and maintainability.database/migration/sql_creator.go (1)
Action Required: Update
NewSqlCreatorCalls with Correctdatabase.DriverTypeThe shell script output reveals that
NewSqlCreatoris still being called with astringfor thedriverparameter in the following locations:
database/migration/sql_creator_test.go:25database/migration/sql_creator_test.go:141database/migration/sql_driver_test.go:84database/migration/sql_driver.go:39Please update these calls to pass a
database.Driverinstance instead of astringto ensure type safety and maintain consistency across the codebase.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
18-23: Consistent update toNewSqlCreatorfunction signatureThe change in the function signature to accept
database.Driverinstead ofstringfor thedriverparameter is consistent with theSqlCreatorstruct modification. This enhances type safety and ensures that only valid database drivers can be used.To ensure this change doesn't break existing code, please verify all calls to
NewSqlCreatoracross the codebase. Run the following script to find all occurrences:🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all calls to NewSqlCreator and verify they use the correct type # Search for NewSqlCreator calls rg --type go -n 'NewSqlCreator\(' -A 3Length of output: 1502
database/console/migration/migrate_rollback_command_test.go (1)
26-31: LGTM: Mock expectations added correctly.The new mock expectations for retrieving migration table and driver settings are correctly implemented. However, consider extracting the hardcoded values to constants for better maintainability.
Consider refactoring the hardcoded values:
+const ( + migrationsTable = "migrations" + migrationsDriver = contractsmigration.DriverSql + databaseCharset = "utf8bm4" +) -mockConfig.EXPECT().GetString("database.migrations.table").Return("migrations").Once() -mockConfig.EXPECT().GetString("database.migrations.driver").Return(contractsmigration.DriverSql).Once() -mockConfig.EXPECT().GetString(fmt.Sprintf("database.connections.%s.charset", testQuery.Docker().Driver().String())).Return("utf8bm4").Once() +mockConfig.EXPECT().GetString("database.migrations.table").Return(migrationsTable).Once() +mockConfig.EXPECT().GetString("database.migrations.driver").Return(migrationsDriver).Once() +mockConfig.EXPECT().GetString(fmt.Sprintf("database.connections.%s.charset", testQuery.Docker().Driver().String())).Return(databaseCharset).Once()database/console/migration/migrate_rollback_command.go (1)
Line range hint
72-84: Approve the updated error handling logic.The changes to the error handling in the
Handlemethod are well-implemented. The use oferrors.Isanderrors.Asfunctions from the custom error package aligns with Go's best practices for error handling.For improved readability, consider extracting the error handling logic into a separate function. This would make the
Handlemethod more concise and easier to understand. Here's a suggested refactoring:func (receiver *MigrateRollbackCommand) Handle(ctx console.Context) error { // ... (previous code remains unchanged) - if err = m.Steps(step); err != nil && !errors.Is(err, migrate.ErrNoChange) && !errors.Is(err, migrate.ErrNilVersion) { - var errShortLimit migrate.ErrShortLimit - switch { - case errors.As(err, &errShortLimit): - default: - color.Red().Println("Migration rollback failed:", err.Error()) - return nil - } + if err = m.Steps(step); err != nil { + return receiver.handleMigrationError(err) } color.Green().Println("Migration rollback success") return nil } +func (receiver *MigrateRollbackCommand) handleMigrationError(err error) error { + if errors.Is(err, migrate.ErrNoChange) || errors.Is(err, migrate.ErrNilVersion) { + return nil + } + var errShortLimit migrate.ErrShortLimit + if errors.As(err, &errShortLimit) { + return nil + } + color.Red().Println("Migration rollback failed:", err.Error()) + return nil +}This refactoring improves the readability of the
Handlemethod while maintaining the same functionality.database/console/seed_command.go (3)
86-86: LGTM: Error handling improved, consider adding error wrapping.The error return has been updated to use a predefined error from the centralized errors package, which is a good practice. This change improves consistency in error handling across the codebase.
Consider wrapping the error with additional context:
return fmt.Errorf("failed to proceed with seeding: %w", errors.DBForceIsRequiredInProduction)This would provide more context about where the error occurred, which can be helpful for debugging.
90-98: LGTM: GetSeeders method updated correctly with improved error handling.The changes to the
GetSeedersmethod are well-implemented:
- The method signature and variable type have been correctly updated to use
contractsseeder.Seeder.- The error handling now uses the centralized
errorspackage with parameterized errors, which is a good practice.These changes improve consistency and make the error messages more informative.
Consider adding a comment explaining the
Args()method usage for better code readability:// Return a parameterized error with the seeder name return nil, errors.DBSeederNotFound.Args(name)
Line range hint
1-103: Overall, the changes in this file are well-implemented and align with the PR objectives.The refactoring to use the new
contractsseederpackage and the improvements in error handling are consistent and beneficial. The code maintains its functionality while improving organization and error reporting.Consider the following architectural improvements for future iterations:
- Implement dependency injection for the
errorspackage to improve testability.- Add more detailed logging throughout the seeding process for better observability.
- Consider implementing a strategy pattern for different seeding strategies if the seeding logic becomes more complex in the future.
database/migration/test_utils.go (2)
9-12: Consider adding documentation for the Agent structThe
Agentstruct has been added, which is good. However, it would be beneficial to add a comment explaining the purpose of this struct and its fields. This will improve the package's documentation and make it easier for other developers to understand and use this struct.Example:
// Agent represents an agent entity in the system. // It embeds orm.Model to include common fields like ID, created_at, and updated_at. type Agent struct { orm.Model Name string }
14-14: Approve renaming and suggest adding documentationThe renaming of
createMigrationstoCreateTestMigrationsis a good change as it clarifies the function's purpose. However, since this function is now exported, it would be beneficial to add a comment explaining its purpose and usage.Example:
// CreateTestMigrations generates test migration files for the specified database driver. // It creates SQL files for creating and dropping an 'agents' table. func CreateTestMigrations(driver database.Driver) { // ... (existing function body) }This documentation will help users of the package understand how to use this function and what it does.
database/console/migration/migrate_fresh_command_test.go (3)
27-30: LGTM: Mock expectations for configuration added.The new mock expectations for retrieving the migration table name, driver, and database charset are correctly set up. This ensures that the test is using the proper configuration.
Consider extracting the string literals (e.g., "database.migrations.table") into constants at the package level for better maintainability and to avoid potential typos in future updates.
52-60: LGTM: Mock setup for seeding test case improved.The new mock expectations for the seeding test case are well-structured and comprehensive. They ensure that the --seed flag and seeder options are properly handled in the test.
Consider extracting the string literal "MockSeeder" into a constant at the test function level. This would improve maintainability and make it easier to update the test seeder name if needed in the future.
Line range hint
1-87: LGTM: Comprehensive test coverage for MigrateFreshCommand.The test file provides thorough coverage of the MigrateFreshCommand functionality, including scenarios for fresh migration, seeding with specified seeders, and seeding without specified seeders. The consistent use of mock objects and appropriate assertions ensures that the command's behavior is well-tested under various conditions.
Consider adding a test case for error handling, such as when the migration fails or when an invalid seeder is specified. This would further improve the robustness of the test suite.
database/console/migration/migrate_refresh_command_test.go (4)
26-33: LGTM: Improved test setup with clearer mock expectationsThe use of
EXPECT()for setting up mock configurations improves the clarity and reliability of the tests. The addition of a mock schema aligns with the changes in the migration framework.Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of each mock configuration for better readability.
52-57: LGTM: Enhanced mock setup for step optionThe creation of new mock objects for artisan, context, and schema, along with the addition of mock expectations for the
stepoption, improves the test's ability to handle different scenarios. This approach ensures better isolation between test cases.Consider adding a comment explaining the significance of the "5" step value used in the test.
Line range hint
78-82: LGTM: Added database verification after migrationThe addition of a database query to verify the migration result is an excellent improvement. It ensures that the migration process actually affects the database as expected, providing an extra layer of verification beyond just checking command execution.
Consider adding an assertion to verify specific fields of the
agent1record, not just its existence and ID, to further enhance the test's robustness.
Line range hint
1-86: Great job on refactoring and expanding the test suiteThe changes made to this file significantly improve the quality and coverage of the tests for the MigrateRefreshCommand. The use of
EXPECT()for mock expectations, the addition of new test scenarios, and the verification of database state after migration all contribute to a more robust and maintainable test suite.To further enhance the test suite, consider adding a test case that verifies the behavior when an invalid or non-existent seeder is specified. This would help ensure that the command handles error cases gracefully.
database/migration/default_creator_test.go (2)
20-22: Consider adding a comment to explain the SetupTest method.The
SetupTestmethod correctly initializes a freshDefaultCreatorinstance before each test. To improve code readability, consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this method.You could add a comment like this:
// SetupTest initializes a fresh DefaultCreator instance before each test func (s *DefaultCreatorSuite) SetupTest() { s.defaultCreator = NewDefaultCreator() }
24-127: LGTM: Comprehensive table-driven tests for PopulateStub.The
TestPopulateStubmethod is well-structured using a table-driven approach, which is excellent for testing multiple scenarios. The test cases cover different stub types (empty, create, and update) with detailed expected outputs.Minor suggestion: Consider adding a test case for an edge case, such as a stub with special characters or an extremely long name, to ensure robustness.
You could add an additional test case like this:
{ name: "Long table name with special characters", stub: Stubs{}.Create(), signature: "202410131203_create_very_long_table_name_with_special_characters_table", table: "very_long_table_name_with_special_characters!@#$%^&*()_+", expected: "...", // Add the expected output here },database/migration/sql_creator_test.go (1)
44-44: LGTM: Enhanced type safety fordriverfieldThe change from
stringtodatabase.Driverfor thedriverfield improves type safety and aligns the test cases with the actual implementation. This is a good practice that reduces the likelihood of errors and improves code maintainability.Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the
testsstruct and its fields, especially now that we're using a more specific type for thedriverfield. This would enhance code readability for future maintainers.database/orm_test.go (1)
Line range hint
137-165: Great expansion of context handling tests!The new test cases in
TestWithContextsignificantly improve the coverage of context handling scenarios in the ORM. They verify that context is correctly propagated through different method call chains, which is crucial for ensuring consistent behavior across various usage patterns.A minor suggestion for improved readability:
Consider adding comments before each test case to clearly delineate the scenario being tested. For example:
// Test WithContext directly with Query err := s.orm.WithContext(ctx).Query().Create(&user) // ... // Test Connection, then WithContext, then Query for driver := range s.testQueries { // ... } // Test WithContext, then Connection, then Query for driver := range s.testQueries { // ... }This would make it easier for other developers to understand the purpose of each test case at a glance.
database/console/driver/sqlite.go (1)
Line range hint
1-300: Overall assessment: Positive refactoring with minimal impact.The changes made to this file are primarily structural and improve the modularity of the codebase. The core functionality remains intact, which is a positive sign. The package name change and error handling simplification are good improvements that should make the code more maintainable and extensible.
Consider the following architectural improvements for future iterations:
- If this package is intended to support multiple database drivers, consider creating separate files for each driver implementation.
- Look into using interfaces to define common behavior across different database drivers, which could further improve modularity and make it easier to add new drivers in the future.
errors/list.go (1)
69-69: LGTM: Good error for unsupported drivers. Consider adding supported drivers info.The
MigrationUnsupportedDrivererror variable is a valuable addition. It provides clear feedback when an unsupported migration driver is specified.Consider enhancing the error message to include information about the supported drivers. This could be done by modifying the error message as follows:
MigrationUnsupportedDriver = New("unsupported migration driver: %s. Supported drivers are: [list of supported drivers]")This would provide users with immediate information about which drivers they can use.
database/migration/sql_driver.go (1)
89-89: Correct typo in error message identifierThe error identifier
errors.OrmFailedToGenerateDNScontains a typo; it should beerrors.OrmFailedToGenerateDSN. DSN stands for Data Source Name, which is relevant in this context.Apply this diff to correct the error identifier:
- return nil, errors.OrmFailedToGenerateDNS.Args(writeConfig.Connection) + return nil, errors.OrmFailedToGenerateDSN.Args(writeConfig.Connection)database/migration/repository_test.go (1)
51-62: Consider reducing duplication in mock setupsThere are multiple instances where
mockOrm.EXPECT().Query().Return(testQuery.Query()).Once()is called throughout the tests. To adhere to the DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle, consider extracting this repeated setup into a helper function or moving it into a common setup method to improve maintainability.Also applies to: 74-157
database/migration/schema_test.go (1)
50-50: Assertion ofs.NoError(err)might not be validating as intendedAt lines 50 and 70, the assertions
s.NoError(err)are used, but iferris alwaysnildue to the mock setup, these assertions may not effectively validate error handling within the transaction.Ensure that the tests can fail appropriately if an error occurs. You might need to simulate an error in the mock to test the error-handling logic properly.
Also applies to: 70-70
database/migration/default_driver_test.go (2)
236-265: Implement theDown()methods for migrationsThe
Down()methods forTestMigrationandTestConnectionMigrationare currently empty. Implementing these methods can improve test coverage and ensure that rollback functionality works as expected.Example implementation:
func (s *TestMigration) Down() { + s.Up() }Similarly for
TestConnectionMigration:func (s *TestConnectionMigration) Down() { + s.Up() }Adjust the logic as necessary to reflect the actual rollback behavior.
9-10: Organize imports according to Go conventionsThe standard convention is to group imports into standard library packages, third-party packages, and local packages, separated by blank lines. This improves readability.
Apply this diff to organize the imports:
import ( + "errors" + "os" + "path/filepath" + "testing" + "github.com/stretchr/testify/suite" + "github.com/goravel/framework/contracts/database/migration" mocksmigration "github.com/goravel/framework/mocks/database/migration" "github.com/goravel/framework/support/carbon" "github.com/goravel/framework/support/file" )database/gorm/query_test.go (5)
3645-3646: Inadequate error handling afterQueryOfReadWriteAfter calling
QueryOfReadWrite, the error returned is only checked usingrequire.NoError(t, err). While this will fail the test iferris notnil, it might be more informative to provide additional context or handle the error gracefully.Consider adding a descriptive message to
require.NoError(t, err)to provide more context in case of failure.
Line range hint
3602-3612: EmptySetupTestmethodThe
SetupTestmethod inQueryTestSuiteis currently empty.If
SetupTestis not needed for initializing the test suite, consider removing it to keep the code clean and concise.
Line range hint
3597-3601: Potential issue with pointer comparison inTestObserverThe assertion
assert.Equal(t, &UserObserver{}, getObserver(User{}))compares pointers to structs, which may not be reliable since it compares memory addresses rather than the content.Use
assert.IsType(t, &UserObserver{}, getObserver(User{}))orassert.NotNil(t, getObserver(User{}))to verify that an observer of the correct type is returned.
Line range hint
3520-3522: Ineffective error assertion inTestGetModelConnectionIn the test cases where an error is expected (e.g., when the model is invalid), the code uses
assert.Nil(t, err)instead of checking for the expected error.Replace
assert.Nil(t, err)withassert.EqualError(t, err, test.expectErr)to properly assert that the correct error is returned when expected.
Line range hint
3602-3603: Unhandled event type inTestObserverEventIn
TestObserverEvent, the callgetObserverEvent("error", &UserObserver{})returnsnil, but this case is not handled explicitly.Consider adding handling for unexpected event types in
getObserverEventto improve robustness. This could include logging a warning or returning an error to indicate that the event type is unrecognized.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
mocks/database/migration/Driver.gois excluded by!mocks/**mocks/database/migration/Repository.gois excluded by!mocks/**mocks/database/migration/Schema.gois excluded by!mocks/**mocks/database/orm/Orm.gois excluded by!mocks/**
📒 Files selected for processing (45)
- contracts/database/migration/driver.go (1 hunks)
- contracts/database/migration/repository.go (1 hunks)
- contracts/database/migration/schema.go (1 hunks)
- contracts/database/orm/orm.go (1 hunks)
- database/console/driver/sqlite.go (2 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate.go (4 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_command.go (1 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_command_test.go (0 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_fresh_command.go (1 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_fresh_command_test.go (2 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_make_command.go (3 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_make_command_test.go (6 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_refresh_command.go (1 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_refresh_command_test.go (2 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_reset_command.go (1 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_reset_command_test.go (2 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_rollback_command.go (1 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_rollback_command_test.go (2 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_status_command_test.go (2 hunks)
- database/console/migration/utils.go (1 hunks)
- database/console/migration/utils_test.go (2 hunks)
- database/console/seed_command.go (2 hunks)
- database/console/seed_command_test.go (2 hunks)
- database/gorm/query_test.go (4 hunks)
- database/gorm/test_utils.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/default_creator.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/default_creator_test.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/default_driver.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/default_driver_test.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/driver_test.go (0 hunks)
- database/migration/repository.go (6 hunks)
- database/migration/repository_test.go (4 hunks)
- database/migration/schema.go (4 hunks)
- database/migration/schema_test.go (3 hunks)
- database/migration/sql_creator.go (2 hunks)
- database/migration/sql_creator_test.go (2 hunks)
- database/migration/sql_driver.go (2 hunks)
- database/migration/sql_driver_test.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/stubs.go (2 hunks)
- database/migration/test_utils.go (1 hunks)
- database/orm.go (1 hunks)
- database/orm_test.go (1 hunks)
- database/service_provider.go (3 hunks)
- errors/list.go (2 hunks)
- errors/modules.go (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- database/console/migration/migrate_command_test.go
- database/migration/driver_test.go
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (133)
contracts/database/migration/driver.go (1)
12-12: Clarify the new migration execution processThe
Runmethod signature has been changed to remove thepaths []stringparameter. This modification aligns with the previous comment about implementingpathswhen removing the sql driver. However, it raises some questions about the new migration execution process:
- How will the migration files be located now that the paths are not provided to the
Runmethod?- Is there a new centralized way of managing migration paths?
- Does this change affect the flexibility of running migrations for specific paths?
- Have all implementations of this interface been updated to reflect this change?
Please provide more context on how migrations will be executed with this new signature and ensure that all implementations have been updated accordingly.
To verify the impact of this change, please run the following script:
database/console/migration/utils.go (4)
7-7: LGTM: Import statement added for error handling.The addition of the
errorspackage import is consistent with the updated error handling in the function body.
19-21: LGTM: SQL driver creation simplified and error handling improved.The simplification of SQL driver creation and the use of a custom error type for unsupported drivers are good improvements. These changes should make the code more maintainable and provide better error information.
Please verify that the
NewSqlDriverfunction in themigrationpackage has been updated to handle the database connection details internally. Run the following script:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the signature and implementation of NewSqlDriver function # Test 1: Search for NewSqlDriver function definition. Expect: One parameter of type config.Config. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func NewSqlDriver($config config.Config) contractsmigration.Driver' # Test 2: Check if NewSqlDriver is extracting database connection details internally. rg --type go -A 10 'func NewSqlDriver' | rg 'GetString|GetInt'
15-17: LGTM: Default driver creation updated.The modification to use both
schemaandtablewhen creating the default driver is consistent with the function signature change. This allows for more flexibility in driver creation.Please verify that the
NewDefaultDriverfunction in themigrationpackage has been updated to accept these two parameters and no longer returns an error. Run the following script:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the signature of NewDefaultDriver function # Test: Search for NewDefaultDriver function definition. Expect: Two parameters and no error return. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func NewDefaultDriver($schema contractsmigration.Schema, $table string) contractsmigration.Driver'
10-10: Verify all calls to GetDriver are updated.The addition of the
schemaparameter to theGetDriverfunction signature is a good improvement. It allows for more flexibility in how the driver is created.Please ensure all calls to
GetDriverin the codebase have been updated to include the newschemaparameter. Run the following script to verify:✅ Verification successful
All GetDriver Function Calls Verified
All calls to
GetDriverhave been updated to include theschemaparameter.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all calls to GetDriver and verify they include the schema parameter # Test: Search for GetDriver calls. Expect: All calls should have two arguments. rg --type go 'GetDriver\s*\([^)]+\)' -g '!database/console/migration/utils.go'Length of output: 597
contracts/database/migration/repository.go (3)
15-15: Consistent change, but verify impact of removing error handling from DeleteRepository()The removal of the error return from
DeleteRepository()is consistent with the change toCreateRepository(). However, similar concerns apply:
- Error handling: How will errors during repository deletion be communicated and handled?
- Caller impact: Existing code calling this method may expect an error return.
- Implementation changes: All implementations of this interface will need to be updated.
Please run the following script to assess the impact of this change:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for implementations and usages of DeleteRepository # Find implementations of DeleteRepository echo "Implementations of DeleteRepository:" ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func ($v $_) DeleteRepository() { $$ }' # Find calls to DeleteRepository echo "\nCalls to DeleteRepository:" rg --type go 'DeleteRepository\(\)' -C 2 # Check for error handling around DeleteRepository calls echo "\nPotential error handling around DeleteRepository calls:" rg --type go 'if.*DeleteRepository\(\).*err.*!= nil' -C 2Based on the results, we may need to update implementations and adjust error handling in caller code.
Line range hint
1-32: Consider consistency and overall impact of error handling changesThe changes to
CreateRepository()andDeleteRepository()create an inconsistency in error handling within theRepositoryinterface:
- These two methods no longer return errors, while others like
Delete(),GetLast(), etc., still do.- This inconsistency might lead to confusion for developers implementing or using this interface.
- It's unclear if this is part of a larger refactoring effort to remove error returns from all methods.
Consider the following:
- If the goal is to simplify error handling, consider applying this change consistently across all methods in the interface.
- If these specific methods are guaranteed never to fail, document this clearly to explain the lack of error returns.
- Evaluate if removing error returns aligns with Go's idiomatic error handling practices and your project's error management strategy.
To better understand the context of these changes, please run:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for similar interfaces and their error handling patterns # Find other interfaces in the project echo "Other interfaces in the project:" rg --type go '^\s*type\s+\w+\s+interface\s*{' -C 5 # Check for methods without error returns in these interfaces echo "\nMethods without error returns in interfaces:" rg --type go '^\s*\w+\([^)]*\)(?!\s*error)' -C 2This will help determine if this change is part of a broader pattern or an isolated modification.
11-11: Verify the impact of removing error handling from CreateRepository()The removal of the error return from
CreateRepository()simplifies the interface but raises concerns:
- Error handling: How will errors during repository creation be communicated and handled?
- Caller impact: Existing code calling this method may expect an error return.
- Implementation changes: All implementations of this interface will need to be updated.
Please run the following script to assess the impact of this change:
Based on the results, we may need to update implementations and adjust error handling in caller code.
database/console/migration/migrate_reset_command.go (1)
9-9: LGTM! Verify new error package usage.The change from the standard
errorspackage github.com/goravel/framework/errorsis appropriate and aligns with the framework's approach to error handling. The usage in theHandlemethod remains compatible.To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's verify the usage of the new error package:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Error package usage consistent across the codebase.
The import of
github.com/goravel/framework/errorshas been correctly applied, and all instances oferrors.Newutilize the new error package as intended.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new error package across the codebase # Test 1: Check for any remaining imports of the standard errors package echo "Checking for standard errors package imports:" rg --type go 'import\s+(\([^)]*\)\s*)?([^()\s]+\s+)?"errors"' # Test 2: Verify the consistent use of the new error package echo "Verifying consistent use of the new error package:" rg --type go 'github.com/goravel/framework/errors' # Test 3: Check for any uses of errors.New that might need updating echo "Checking for uses of errors.New:" rg --type go 'errors\.New'Length of output: 13893
contracts/database/migration/schema.go (2)
3-5: LGTM: Import statement addition is appropriate.The addition of the
ormpackage import is consistent with the newOrm()method in theSchemainterface.
31-31: Consistent change toTablemethod, consider error handling.The removal of the error return type from the
Tablemethod is consistent with the changes made toCreateandDropIfExists.Please refer to the previous comment regarding the error handling strategy, as the same considerations apply to this method.
database/console/migration/migrate_reset_command_test.go (5)
4-4: LGTM: Import statements updated appropriately.The new imports (
fmt,contractsmigration, andmocksmigration) align well with the changes made in the test function. They provide the necessary tools for enhanced mocking and configuration handling in the migration tests.Also applies to: 9-9, 11-11, 13-13
43-43: LGTM: Improved type specificity for agent variable.The explicit change of the
agentvariable type fromAgenttomigration.Agentenhances type safety and code clarity. This modification ensures that the variable type aligns correctly with the expected type for the migration context.
35-35: LGTM: Added schema mocking to migrate command.The addition of
mockSchemaand its inclusion inNewMigrateCommandenhances the test's ability to verify schema-related behaviors. This change aligns with the evolving requirements of the migrate command.Let's verify the updated signature of
NewMigrateCommand:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the signature of NewMigrateCommand function rg --type go -A 3 "func NewMigrateCommand"Also applies to: 37-37
32-32: LGTM: Improved test migration creation.The switch to
migration.CreateTestMigrations(driver)indicates a more structured approach to creating test migrations. This change likely improves consistency across different test files.Could you provide more information about the
CreateTestMigrationsfunction? Let's verify its implementation:✅ Verification successful
[Verified]:
CreateTestMigrationsimplementation confirmed and improvement appreciated.The implementation of
migration.CreateTestMigrations(driver)indatabase/migration/test_utils.gois well-structured and enhances consistency across different test files.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of CreateTestMigrations function rg --type go -A 10 "func CreateTestMigrations"Length of output: 504
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of CreateTestMigrations function using rg rg --type go "func CreateTestMigrations" -A 10Length of output: 715
Line range hint
1-49: Overall improvements to migration reset command test.The changes in this file significantly enhance the testing of the migrate reset command. The introduction of more detailed mocking, especially for configuration and schema, along with the structured approach to creating test migrations, should lead to more robust and comprehensive tests.
To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's verify if similar changes have been applied to other migration-related test files:
This will help us identify if the improvements have been consistently applied across all relevant test files.
✅ Verification successful
Similar Changes Confirmed in Other Test Files
The verification confirms that similar mocking patterns and changes have been consistently applied across other migration test files. This indicates that the absence of removed or replaced code in this file aligns with the overall refactoring approach.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for similar changes in other migration test files rg --type go -g "*migration*test.go" -e "mockConfig.EXPECT\(\).GetString\(\"database\.migrations" -e "migration\.CreateTestMigrations" -e "mockSchema :=" -e "var agent migration\.Agent"Length of output: 335
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate all migration test files and search for specific mocking patterns to verify consistency. # Find all Go test files related to migration migration_test_files=$(fd --type f --extension go --glob "*migration*test.go") # Check if any migration test files are found if [ -z "$migration_test_files" ]; then echo "No migration test files found." exit 1 fi # Search for the specific mocking patterns within the found test files echo "$migration_test_files" | xargs rg --files-with-matches "mockConfig\.EXPECT\(\)\.GetString\(\"database\.migrations" --files-with-matches "migration\.CreateTestMigrations" --files-with-matches "mockSchema :=" --files-with-matches "var agent migration\.Agent" # Provide an overall summary if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then echo "Similar changes found in the above files." else echo "No similar changes detected in other migration test files." fiLength of output: 177
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Broadly locate all Go test files related to migration and search for specific mocking patterns to verify consistency. # Find all Go test files that include 'migration' in their name or path migration_test_files=$(fd --type f --extension go --regex 'migration.*_test\.go$|_test\.go$' | grep 'migration') # Check if any migration test files are found if [ -z "$migration_test_files" ]; then echo "No migration test files found with the updated search patterns." exit 1 fi # Search for the specific mocking patterns within the found test files echo "$migration_test_files" | xargs rg --quiet "mockConfig\.EXPECT\(\)\.GetString\(\"database\.migrations" || echo "No matching mocking patterns found in the migration test files." # Provide an overall summary if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then echo "Similar changes found in the above files." else echo "No similar changes detected in other migration test files." fiLength of output: 2791
database/console/migration/migrate_status_command_test.go (4)
4-4: LGTM: New imports are appropriate for the changes.The added imports for "fmt", contractsmigration, and mocksmigration are consistent with the enhanced test setup described in the AI summary. These new packages will support the updated test logic and mock configurations.
Also applies to: 9-9, 11-11, 13-13
28-30: LGTM: Enhanced mock setup improves test robustness.The new mock expectations for
mockConfigare well-structured and align with the changes described in the AI summary. They provide a more comprehensive setup for testing the migration status command by mocking the retrieval of essential configuration values (table name, driver, and charset).The use of
Once()for each expectation is a good practice, ensuring that each mock method is called exactly once during the test.
35-35: LGTM: Addition of mockSchema enhances test isolation.The introduction of
mockSchemausingmocksmigration.NewSchema(t)is a valuable addition to the test setup. This change allows for better isolation in testing the migration command's behavior by providing a mock implementation of the schema.
37-37: LGTM: Updated NewMigrateCommand call with mockSchema.The change to
NewMigrateCommand(mockConfig, mockSchema)is consistent with the updated function signature mentioned in the AI summary. This modification allows for more comprehensive testing of the migrate command by including the mock schema.To ensure consistency, let's verify the implementation of
NewMigrateCommand:database/migration/sql_creator.go (2)
14-14: Improved type safety for thedriverfieldThe change from
stringtodatabase.Driverfor thedriverfield enhances type safety and makes the code more self-documenting. This modification aligns well with best practices for strong typing in Go.
Line range hint
38-60: Simplified switch statement inGetStubmethodThe removal of the type assertion
database.Driver(r.driver)in the switch statement is a positive change. It simplifies the code and eliminates a potential source of runtime errors. This modification is a natural consequence of updating thedriverfield type and improves code readability.database/console/migration/migrate_make_command.go (5)
7-8: LGTM: New imports are correctly added.The new import statements for
migrationanderrorspackages are necessary for the changes made in this file. They are correctly placed and aligned with the modifications in the code.
14-14: LGTM: New schema field added to MigrateMakeCommand struct.The addition of the
schemafield of typemigration.Schemato theMigrateMakeCommandstruct is appropriate. This change aligns with the enhanced functionality of the migration command process.
17-18: LGTM: NewMigrateMakeCommand function updated correctly.The
NewMigrateMakeCommandfunction has been properly updated to include the newschemaparameter and initialize theschemafield in the returned struct. These changes are consistent with the modifications made to theMigrateMakeCommandstruct.
49-49: LGTM: Improved error handling for empty migration name.The replacement of the generic error message with
errors.MigrationNameIsRequiredis a good improvement. This change enhances error handling by using a specific error type, which allows for more precise error checking and handling throughout the application.
60-60: LGTM: GetDriver call updated, but verify GetDriver function.The update to the
GetDriverfunction call to includer.schemais consistent with the changes made to theMigrateMakeCommandstruct. This change appears correct, but it's important to ensure that theGetDriverfunction has been updated accordingly in its implementation.To verify the
GetDriverfunction update, please run the following command:This will help confirm that the
GetDriverfunction signature has been updated to accept the additionalschemaparameter.✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: GetDriver function updated correctly.
The
GetDriverfunction is updated to accept theschemaparameter, aligning with the changes in theMigrateMakeCommandstruct.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the GetDriver function definition ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func GetDriver($config $_, $schema $_) ($_)'Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all GetDriver function definitions rg "func GetDriver"Length of output: 165
database/console/migration/migrate_rollback_command_test.go (7)
4-4: LGTM: Import statements updated correctly.The new import statements for "fmt", "contractsmigration", and "mocksmigration" are correctly added and necessary for the updated test logic.
Also applies to: 9-9, 11-11, 13-13
32-32: LGTM: Migration creation updated to use shared utility.The change to use
migration.CreateTestMigrations(driver)is a good improvement, likely leveraging a shared test utility in the migration package.
35-35: LGTM: Mock context expectation syntax updated.The change from
mockContext.On("Option", "step")tomockContext.EXPECT().Option("step")is a good improvement. It aligns with modern mocking libraries and provides better clarity in expectations.
37-37: LGTM: Mock schema creation added.The addition of
mockSchema := mocksmigration.NewSchema(t)is appropriate and necessary for the updatedNewMigrateCommandfunction signature.
42-42: LGTM: Agent variable types updated correctly.The change of
agentandagent1variable types fromAgenttomigration.Agentimproves type safety and code clarity by using a more specific type from the migration package.Also applies to: 50-50
Line range hint
1-56: Overall, the changes improve test clarity and functionality.The updates to this test file enhance the setup and execution of the migration rollback command test. Key improvements include:
- More specific import statements
- Clearer mock expectations
- Use of shared test utilities
- Updated mock syntax
- Addition of schema mocking
- More specific type usage
These changes collectively make the test more robust and easier to maintain. Good job on improving the test suite!
39-39: LGTM: NewMigrateCommand updated with schema parameter.The addition of the
mockSchemaparameter toNewMigrateCommandis correct and aligns with the updated function signature.To ensure this change is consistent across the codebase, please run the following command:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: All instances of
NewMigrateCommandcorrectly include theschemaparameter.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that all calls to NewMigrateCommand include the schema parameter rg "NewMigrateCommand\([^)]*\)" --type goLength of output: 982
database/console/migration/migrate_rollback_command.go (1)
13-13: Approve the custom error package import.The change from the standard
errorspackage github.com/goravel/framework/errorsis a good practice for maintaining consistency with the framework's error handling approach.To ensure this change is consistently applied across the codebase, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
The standard
errorspackage has been successfully replaced withgithub.aaakk.us.kg/goravel/framework/errorsacross the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new error package across the codebase. # Test 1: Check for any remaining imports of the standard errors package echo "Checking for standard errors package imports:" rg --type go 'import\s+(\([^)]*\)\s*)?([^()\s]*\s*)?"errors"' # Test 2: Check for usage of the new error package echo "Checking for usage of the new error package:" rg --type go 'github.com/goravel/framework/errors'Length of output: 5212
database/console/migration/migrate_fresh_command.go (3)
Line range hint
1-105: LGTM: Approve changes with minor verificationThe changes in this file look good. The replacement of the standard
errorspackage with a custom one appears to be part of a larger refactoring effort. As long as the customerrorspackage maintains compatibility with the standard library and the verification steps pass, these changes should not introduce any issues.
11-11: Verify the custom errors package compatibilityThe standard
errorspackage has been replaced with a customerrorspackage fromgithub.aaakk.us.kg/goravel/framework/errors. This change affects error handling throughout the file.To ensure that this change doesn't introduce any unexpected behavior, please run the following verification script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the custom errors package usage and compatibility # Test 1: Check if the custom errors package provides the necessary functions ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'package errors func Is(err, target error) bool { $$$ }' # Test 2: Verify that there are no remaining imports of the standard errors package rg --type go 'import \(\n.*"errors"\n\)' || echo "No standard errors package import found." # Test 3: Check for any other uses of errors.Is in the codebase that might be affected rg --type go 'errors\.Is\('
Line range hint
72-73: Verify error handling behavior with custom errors packageThe custom
errorspackage is used to compare errors againstmigrate.ErrNoChange. Ensure that this behavior remains consistent with the standard library implementation.Please run the following test to verify the error handling behavior:
Also applies to: 86-87
✅ Verification successful
Verify error handling behavior with custom errors package
The error handling using the custom
errorspackage correctly compares errors againstmigrate.ErrNoChangein theHandlemethod. No issues were found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify error handling behavior with custom errors package # Test: Check if migrate.ErrNoChange is properly handled ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'if err = m.Drop(); err != nil && !errors.Is(err, migrate.ErrNoChange) { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'if err2 = m2.Up(); err2 != nil && !errors.Is(err2, migrate.ErrNoChange) { $$$ }'Length of output: 1055
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify error handling behavior with custom errors package # Test: Check if migrate.ErrNoChange is properly handled in m.Drop() ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'if err = m.Drop(); err != nil && !errors.Is(err, migrate.ErrNoChange) { $$$ }' # Test: Check if migrate.ErrNoChange is properly handled in m2.Up() ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'if err2 = m2.Up(); err2 != nil && !errors.Is(err2, migrate.ErrNoChange) { $$$ }'Length of output: 960
database/console/seed_command_test.go (2)
9-9: LGTM: New import added for error handling.The new import for the
errorspackage is correctly added and is necessary for the updated error handling in theTestConfirmToProceedmethod.
55-55: Improved error handling: Using ErrorIs instead of EqualError.The change from
s.EqualErrortos.ErrorIsis a significant improvement in error handling. This modification shifts from string comparison to type assertion, which is more robust and aligns with Go best practices. UsingErrorIswith a predefined error type (errors.DBForceIsRequiredInProduction) allows for more precise error checking and better error standardization across the application.database/console/seed_command.go (3)
7-8: LGTM: Import changes are appropriate.The addition of the
contractsseederimport and the update to theerrorsimport align well with the package restructuring mentioned in the PR summary. These changes should improve code organization and error handling consistency.
14-14: LGTM: SeedCommand struct updated correctly.The
seederfield type has been properly updated to use the newcontractsseeder.Facadetype, which is consistent with the package renaming. This change maintains the existing functionality while aligning with the new package structure.
17-17: LGTM: NewSeedCommand function signature updated correctly.The
NewSeedCommandfunction signature has been properly updated to use the newcontractsseeder.Facadetype for theseederparameter. This change is consistent with the package renaming and maintains the existing functionality.database/console/migration/migrate_refresh_command.go (2)
Line range hint
83-86: Approve unchanged error handling logicThe error handling logic in the
Handlemethod remains consistent with the previous implementation, which is good. The change only affects the package providing the error functions, not the logic itself.To ensure full compatibility with the new
errorspackage, it's recommended to run the existing test suite for this command. This will verify that the error handling behaves as expected with the Goravel framework's error package.Please run the following command to execute the tests for this package:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Run tests for the migration package # Test: Run go test for the migration package go test ./database/console/migration/...Also applies to: 93-101
12-12: Approve import change and verify error handlingThe change from the standard
errorspackage to the Goravel framework's customerrorspackage is appropriate for better integration with the framework. This modification likely provides enhanced error handling capabilities specific to Goravel.To ensure that the error handling in the
Handlemethod is still correct with the newerrorspackage, please run the following verification script:✅ Verification successful
Error handling uses Goravel's custom errors package as intended
The import change from the standard
errorspackage github.com/goravel/framework/errorshas been successfully verified. All error handling in theHandlemethod utilizes the new errors package, and there are no remaining imports of the standarderrorspackage.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify error handling in the Handle method # Test: Check if the error handling logic in Handle method uses the new errors package rg --type go -e 'errors\.Is' -e 'errors\.As' database/console/migration/migrate_refresh_command.go # Test: Verify that there are no remaining imports of the standard errors package rg --type go '"errors"' database/console/migration/migrate_refresh_command.go # Test: Check for any other uses of errors in the file rg --type go '\berrors?\b' database/console/migration/migrate_refresh_command.goLength of output: 1179
database/console/migration/migrate.go (5)
16-16: Improved error handling with custom packageThe addition of the custom errors package (
github.com/goravel/framework/errors) is a positive change. This likely allows for more specific and consistent error types across the framework, improving error handling and debugging.
22-22: Improved variable naming for better readabilityThe introduction of the
dbDrivervariable with a more descriptive name enhances code readability. This change aligns with best practices for clear and self-explanatory variable naming.
31-31: Enhanced error handling and consistencyThe changes in error handling are commendable:
- Using
errors.OrmDatabaseConfigNotFoundprovides more specific context for configuration-related errors.- The switch statement now consistently uses
dbDriver, aligning with the earlier variable renaming.- The use of
errors.OrmDriverNotSupportedin the default case offers clearer information about unsupported drivers.These updates contribute to more robust and informative error handling throughout the function.
Also applies to: 34-34, 113-113
Line range hint
1-115: Overall assessment: Positive improvements with one area for clarificationThe changes in this file represent positive improvements in several areas:
- Enhanced error handling with the introduction of a custom errors package.
- Improved variable naming for better code readability.
- Consistent use of the new
dbDrivervariable throughout the function.These modifications contribute to better code quality and maintainability. The only area that may benefit from further clarification is the change in SQLite driver instantiation (lines 84-86).
Great work on these improvements! Once the SQLite driver change is clarified, this update should be ready for merging.
84-86: SQLite driver instantiation changeThe SQLite driver instantiation has been updated to use
driver.WithInstanceinstead ofsqlite.WithInstance. While this change appears intentional, it would be helpful to understand the rationale behind this modification.Could you please provide more context on this change? Specifically:
- Is this part of a larger refactoring effort?
- Are there any potential compatibility issues to be aware of?
- Does this change align with any updates in the SQLite driver or the framework's database handling?
To ensure this change is consistent across the codebase, please run the following command:
✅ Verification successful
SQLite Driver Instantiation Consistent Across Codebase
The update to use
driver.WithInstancefor SQLite driver instantiation aligns with the implementation of other database drivers (mysql,postgres,sqlserver). This ensures uniformity in how drivers are instantiated across the codebase.
- Verified that all instances of
WithInstancenow use the genericdriver.WithInstancemethod.- No compatibility issues identified with this change.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other instances of SQLite driver usage rg --type go 'WithInstance.*sqlite'Length of output: 37
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all instances of WithInstance in Go files rg --type go 'WithInstance'Length of output: 980
database/migration/test_utils.go (2)
5-5: LGTM: Import added for ORM packageThe addition of the import for the ORM package is appropriate and necessary for the new
Agentstruct.
Line range hint
1-124: Overall assessment: Good changes with minor suggestions for improvementThe changes in this file, including the addition of the
Agentstruct and the renaming ofCreateTestMigrations, improve the clarity and usability of the package. The code is well-structured and handles different database drivers appropriately.The main suggestions for improvement are:
- Add documentation for the new
Agentstruct.- Add documentation for the renamed
CreateTestMigrationsfunction.These additions will enhance the package's usability and make it easier for other developers to understand and use these components.
No major issues or bugs were identified in the changes. Good job on the improvements!
database/orm.go (3)
91-93: LGTM: NewName()method looks goodThe addition of the
Name()method is a good improvement. It provides a clean way to retrieve the connection name, which can be useful for debugging or logging purposes. The implementation is simple and adheres to the single responsibility principle.
102-104: Query() method functionality unchangedThe
Query()method has been removed and re-added without any apparent change in functionality. It still returns thequeryfield of theOrmstruct. While this doesn't introduce any issues, it would be helpful to understand the reasoning behind this change. Was this part of a larger refactoring effort?To ensure no unintended changes were introduced, let's verify the method's usage:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any changes in the usage of the Query() method # Search for Query() method calls rg --type go -A 5 '\bQuery\(\)'
Line range hint
1-145: Request: Please provide the full implementation of theConnection()methodThe AI summary mentions updates to the
Connection()method, including handling the case where the connection name is empty by defaulting to a configuration value. However, these changes are not visible in the provided code snippet. To properly review these changes, we need to see the full implementation of theConnection()method.Could you please provide the updated code for the
Connection()method?To locate the
Connection()method implementation:database/console/migration/migrate_make_command_test.go (8)
14-14: LGTM: New import for mocksmigration.The addition of the mocksmigration import is correct and necessary for the new mockSchema object used in the test.
23-23: LGTM: New mockSchema variable declaration.The addition of the mockSchema variable is consistent with the new import and follows the existing pattern of declaring mock objects in the test setup.
32-32: LGTM: Initialization of mockSchema in beforeEach function.The initialization of mockSchema is correct and consistent with the initialization of other mock objects. This ensures a fresh mockSchema for each test case.
44-45: LGTM: Updated mocking style in "the migration name is empty" test case.The change from On() to EXPECT() for setting expectations is correct and consistent with the move to using testify/mock. The expectations set accurately test the scenario where the migration name is empty.
53-55: LGTM: Updated mocking style and added migrations table expectation in "default driver" test case.The change to EXPECT() for setting expectations is correct. The addition of the expectation for the migrations table name is a good improvement, ensuring that the test covers this important configuration aspect.
66-71: LGTM: Updated mocking style and added migrations table expectation in "sql driver" test case.The change to EXPECT() for setting expectations is correct and consistent with the new mocking style. The addition of the migrations table name expectation is a good improvement, consistent with the change in the "default driver" test case. The order and content of the expectations accurately test the SQL driver scenario.
96-99: LGTM: Added carbon.UnsetTestNow() to cleanup function.The addition of carbon.UnsetTestNow() in the cleanup function is an important improvement. It ensures that the test time is reset after the tests, preventing potential side effects in other tests that might rely on the current time. This is a good practice for maintaining test isolation.
Line range hint
1-99: Overall assessment: Significant improvements to test quality and consistency.The changes made to this test file represent a substantial improvement in several areas:
- Introduction of a new mockSchema object, enhancing the test setup.
- Consistent update to use EXPECT() instead of On() for setting expectations, aligning with modern mocking practices.
- Addition of migrations table name expectations, improving test coverage.
- Proper cleanup with carbon.UnsetTestNow(), ensuring test isolation.
These changes collectively result in more robust and maintainable tests for the MigrateMakeCommand.
database/console/migration/migrate_fresh_command_test.go (5)
4-4: LGTM: Import statements updated appropriately.The new import statements are correctly added to support the changes in the test file. They provide access to necessary types and functions from the migration package and its mocks.
Also applies to: 9-9, 11-11, 13-13
31-32: LGTM: Mock schema and test migrations setup improved.The addition of a mock schema and the creation of test migrations for the specific driver enhance the test's ability to simulate real-world scenarios accurately. This change improves the overall quality and reliability of the test.
34-38: LGTM: Mock context, artisan, and migrate command setup improved.The use of
mocksconsole.NewContext(t)andmocksconsole.NewArtisan(t)for creating mock objects enhances the test's control over the environment. Including the mock schema in the migrate command creation allows for more thorough testing of the migration process.
46-46: LGTM: Agent variable types updated for consistency.The change from
Agenttomigration.Agentfor the agent variables improves type safety and aligns with the migration package. This update enhances code clarity and maintains consistency throughout the file.Also applies to: 64-64, 79-79
70-75: LGTM: Mock setup for seeding test without specified seeders added.The new mock expectations for the case where the --seed flag is true but no seeders are specified are correctly implemented. This ensures comprehensive testing of the seeding functionality under different scenarios.
database/console/migration/migrate_refresh_command_test.go (6)
4-4: LGTM: Import statements updated appropriatelyThe new imports align with the changes made to optimize the migration command. The addition of
fmt,contractsmigration, andmocksmigrationsuggests improved type safety and better mocking capabilities for the tests.Also applies to: 9-9, 11-11, 13-13
37-37: LGTM: Updated mock context and command instantiationThe changes in mock context setup and
migrateCommandinstantiation reflect the updates in theMigrateCommandconstructor signature. The use ofEXPECT()for context options enhances test clarity and maintainability.Also applies to: 39-39
43-43: LGTM: Improved test case for scenario without --seed flagThe addition of mock expectations for the
seedoption and the use ofEXPECT()method enhance the test's ability to verify the correct behavior when the--seedflag is not set. This change aligns well with the overall improvements in mock usage throughout the file.Also applies to: 47-47
61-64: LGTM: Comprehensive test case for --seed flag with specified seederThe addition of mock expectations for both
seedandseederoptions, along with the verification of the correct artisan call, enhances the test's ability to check the behavior when both--seedand--seederflags are set. This change aligns well with the overall improvements in mock usage and provides better coverage of different command scenarios.
67-68: LGTM: Proper mock setup for final test caseThe creation of new mock objects for artisan and context ensures proper isolation for the final test case. This approach is consistent with the previous test setups in the file and helps maintain the integrity of each test scenario.
71-74: LGTM: Comprehensive test case for --seed flag without specified seederThe addition of mock expectations for
step,seed, andseederoptions, along with the verification of the correct artisan call, enhances the test's ability to check the behavior when the--seedflag is set but no specific seeder is specified. This change provides better coverage of different command scenarios and aligns well with the overall improvements in mock usage throughout the file.database/migration/default_creator_test.go (3)
1-9: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are correct.The package declaration and imports are appropriate for a test file using the testify suite and carbon for time manipulation. All imports are used in the file.
11-18: LGTM: Test suite structure is well-defined.The
DefaultCreatorSuitestruct andTestDefaultCreatorSuitefunction are correctly implemented following the testify suite pattern. This provides a good foundation for organizing the test cases.
1-135: Overall, well-structured and comprehensive test suite.This test file for
DefaultCreatoris well-organized and effectively uses the testify suite and table-driven tests. It covers the main functionality ofPopulateStubandGetFileNamemethods. The suggested improvements, if implemented, will further enhance the robustness and clarity of the tests.Great job on writing thorough tests for this new functionality!
database/migration/sql_creator_test.go (2)
10-10: LGTM: Import statement added for database contractThe addition of the import statement for the database contract is appropriate and aligns with the changes made to the
driverfield type in the test cases.
Line range hint
1-158: Verify test coverage remains comprehensiveThe changes to the
driverfield type and the addition of the import statement improve code quality without altering the test behavior or coverage. The test cases still cover various database systems (MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite, and SQL Server) and both creation and alteration scenarios.To ensure that the test coverage remains comprehensive after these changes, please run the following command and verify that the coverage percentage for this file hasn't decreased:
If the coverage has decreased, consider adding more test cases to maintain the same level of coverage.
database/orm_test.go (2)
44-46: Excellent addition to improve test setup!The new loop that creates tables for each test query is a valuable improvement. It ensures that all necessary database tables are in place before running the tests, which enhances test reliability and consistency across different database drivers.
Line range hint
1-265: Overall, excellent improvements to the ORM test suite!The changes in this file enhance the robustness of the ORM tests in two key areas:
- Improved test setup by ensuring all necessary tables are created before running tests.
- Expanded context handling tests to cover various scenarios and method call chains.
These improvements will help ensure the reliability and correctness of the ORM's context handling capabilities across different database drivers. Great work on improving the test coverage and quality!
database/console/driver/sqlite.go (2)
23-24: LGTM: Error handling simplification.The consolidation of variable declarations and removal of
ErrDatabaseDirtyandErrNoDatabaseNamesuggests a simplification of error handling. This change can lead to more streamlined code.To ensure the removed error variables are not used elsewhere, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining uses of the removed error variables # Test: Search for uses of ErrDatabaseDirty and ErrNoDatabaseName rg --type go 'ErrDatabaseDirty|ErrNoDatabaseName'
1-1: LGTM: Package name change improves modularity.The package name change from
sqlitetodriversuggests a more generic approach, potentially allowing for easier integration of multiple database drivers. This change improves the overall modularity of the codebase.To ensure this change doesn't break existing imports, please run the following script:
errors/list.go (5)
45-45: LGTM: Good addition for production safety.The new error variable
DBForceIsRequiredInProductionis a valuable addition. It enforces the use of the--forceflag in production environments, which is a good safety measure for potentially dangerous operations.
46-46: LGTM: Helpful error for seeder operations.The
DBSeederNotFounderror variable is a good addition. It provides clear feedback when a specified seeder is not found, which will be helpful for debugging and user feedback during database seeding operations.
68-68: LGTM: Essential check for migration operations.The
MigrationNameIsRequirederror variable is a crucial addition. It ensures that all migrations have names, which is essential for proper tracking and management of database schema changes.
76-76: LGTM: Detailed error for ORM connection issues.The
OrmInitConnectionerror variable is a valuable addition. It provides detailed feedback when an ORM connection fails to initialize, including both the connection name and the specific error encountered. This will be very helpful for debugging database connection issues.
Line range hint
45-76: Overall: Excellent additions to error handling.The new error variables (
DBForceIsRequiredInProduction,DBSeederNotFound,MigrationNameIsRequired,MigrationUnsupportedDriver, andOrmInitConnection) are all valuable additions to the error handling capabilities of the application. They provide clear, specific feedback for various scenarios related to database operations, migrations, and ORM connections.These additions are consistent with the existing code style and naming conventions, and they will significantly improve the developer experience when working with these features.
contracts/database/orm/orm.go (2)
17-18: LGTM: NewName()method is a valuable additionThe new
Name() stringmethod is a good addition to theOrminterface. It provides a way to retrieve the current connection name, which can be useful for debugging, logging, or managing multiple database connections.The method signature is clear and follows Go conventions. Its placement within the interface is logical, grouped with other connection-related methods.
21-22: Note:Query()method repositionedThe
Query() Querymethod has been repositioned within theOrminterface. This change doesn't affect the method's functionality or the interface's behavior. It appears to be part of a logical regrouping of methods within the interface.This repositioning is unlikely to impact existing code that uses the
Orminterface, as the order of methods in an interface doesn't affect its functionality.database/console/migration/utils_test.go (9)
10-12: Added necessary imports for errors and mock schemaThe imports of
github.com/goravel/framework/errorsandmocksmigration "github.com/goravel/framework/mocks/database/migration"are appropriate and necessary for the updated error handling and mock schema usage.
16-19: Initialization of mockConfig and mockSchema variablesThe addition of
mockSchema *mocksmigration.SchemaalongsidemockConfig *mocksconfig.Configcorrectly sets up the necessary mocks for testing the updatedGetDriverfunction.
31-31: Retrieval of migration table name in test setupAdding
mockConfig.EXPECT().GetString("database.migrations.table").Return("migrations").Once()ensures that the migration table name is correctly retrieved during the test setup for the "default driver" case.
33-33: Expectation of DefaultDriver instanceUpdating
expectDriverto&migration.DefaultDriver{}aligns with the changes in the driver initialization and ensures the test checks for the correct driver type.
39-43: Expanded test setup for "sql driver" caseIncluding additional expectations for the configuration values of the "sql driver" case ensures that all necessary parameters are mocked for the test. This enhances the accuracy of the test by simulating realistic configuration scenarios.
44-44: Expectation of SqlDriver instanceUpdating
expectDriverto&migration.SqlDriver{}corresponds with the updated driver initialization, ensuring the test validates the correct driver type is returned.
51-51: Improved error handling for unsupported driverThe use of
errors.MigrationUnsupportedDriver.Args("unsupported").SetModule(errors.ModuleMigration).Error()provides a consistent and descriptive error message when an unsupported driver is specified. This enhances error clarity and maintainability.
58-58: Initialization of mocks within each test caseRe-initializing
mockConfigandmockSchemafor each test case ensures that each test is isolated and prevents cross-test contamination, following best testing practices.
61-61: Updated function call to match new signatureModifying the call to
GetDriver(mockConfig, mockSchema)reflects the updated function signature that now requires aschemaparameter. This ensures that the tests are accurately testing the new implementation.database/migration/repository.go (8)
12-15: Constructor updated to removequeryparameterThe
NewRepositoryfunction has been updated to remove thequeryparameter, which aligns with the removal of thequeryfield from theRepositorystruct. This change simplifies the constructor and reflects the new structure of the repository.
28-29: Appropriate handling of delete operationIn the
Deletemethod, the use of_to discard the unused result while capturing the error is appropriate. This ensures that the method returns the error for proper handling without retaining unnecessary data.
44-47: Updated query usage inGetLastmethodThe
GetLastmethod correctly updates the query to user.schema.Orm().Query()instead of the removedr.queryfield. This change maintains functionality with the updated repository structure.
53-55: Updated query usage inGetMigrationsmethodThe
GetMigrationsmethod appropriately usesr.schema.Orm().Query()for fetching migration records. This aligns with the new approach of routing queries through the schema's ORM interface.
62-64: Updated query usage inGetMigrationsByBatchmethodThe
GetMigrationsByBatchmethod correctly utilizesr.schema.Orm().Query(), ensuring consistency in how queries are performed across repository methods.
80-82: Updated query usage inGetRanmethodThe
GetRanmethod has been updated to user.schema.Orm().Query(). This change is appropriate and maintains the functionality of retrieving run migrations.
88-91: Consistent error handling inLogmethodThe
Logmethod properly returns the error from theCreateoperation, ensuring that any issues during logging are propagated to the caller.
100-103: Updated query usage ingetLastBatchNumbermethodThe
getLastBatchNumbermethod correctly updates its query to user.schema.Orm().Query(). This maintains consistency with the other methods and aligns with the updated repository structure.database/migration/default_driver.go (1)
4-4: Verify compatibility of 'slices' package importThe
slicespackage is part of the Go standard library starting from Go 1.21. If the project needs to support earlier Go versions, consider importinggolang.org/x/exp/slicesinstead, or ensure that thego.modfile specifies Go 1.21 or higher.Run the following script to check the Go version specified in
go.mod:✅ Verification successful
Compatibility of 'slices' package import verified
The project specifies Go version
1.22.0, which is higher than1.21. Therefore, importing the standardslicespackage is compatible and appropriate.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the Go version in go.mod is 1.21 or higher. # Test: Extract the Go version. Expect: 'go 1.21' or higher. grep '^go ' go.modLength of output: 30
database/service_provider.go (5)
35-39: Good enhancement: Capture and handle errors fromBuildOrmThe addition of error capturing and handling improves the robustness of the ORM initialization process. By checking for errors returned by
BuildOrm, you provide more informative error messages and enhance fault tolerance.
58-58: Verify the impact of passingniltomigration.NewSchemaReplacing
connectionwithnilwhen initializing the schema may have unintended consequences if theNewSchemafunction expects a valid connection parameter. Please ensure that this change aligns with the expected behavior ofNewSchemaand does not introduce any runtime errors.Consider reviewing the
NewSchemafunction's implementation to confirm that passingnilis appropriate in this context.
75-75: Improved readability: Consolidated conditional checksCombining the existence checks for
artisan,config,schema, andseederinto a single conditional statement enhances code readability and maintainability.
77-78: Update command initializations to includeschemaparameterPassing
schematoconsolemigration.NewMigrateMakeCommandandconsolemigration.NewMigrateCommandaligns with the updated function signatures. Ensure this change is propagated wherever these functions are called.Please verify that all usages of these commands have been updated to include the
schemaparameter.
81-82: Consistency in passingartisanto migration commandsAdding
artisanas a parameter toNewMigrateRefreshCommandandNewMigrateFreshCommandreflects the updated method signatures. Confirm that this change is consistent across the codebase and that dependent code is updated accordingly.Please check that any other calls to these commands now include the
artisanparameter.database/migration/schema.go (1)
68-69: New methods added correctlyThe addition of
GetConnection(),Migrations(), andOrm()methods enhances the functionality of theSchemastruct by providing access to connection details, migrations list, and ORM instance.Also applies to: 100-102, 104-106
database/migration/stubs.go (7)
14-14: UpdatedSignaturemethod return valueThe
Signaturemethod now returns"DummySignature", which is appropriate for identifying the migration uniquely.
32-33: Added necessary import formigration.BlueprintThe import statement for
"github.com/goravel/framework/contracts/database/migration"is required for usingmigration.Blueprintin the code.
39-39: ConsistentSignaturemethod inCreatemigrationThe
Signaturemethod return value is updated to"DummySignature", maintaining consistency across migrations.
44-47: ImplementedUpmethod to createDummyTableThe
Upmethod correctly creates theDummyTablewith anidcolumn and timestamps usingfacades.Schema.Create.
52-52: ImplementedDownmethod to dropDummyTableThe
Downmethod appropriately usesfacades.Schema.DropIfExiststo reverse the migration by droppingDummyTable.
60-61: Added necessary import formigration.BlueprintThe import statement for
"github.com/goravel/framework/contracts/database/migration"is required for usingmigration.Blueprintin theUpdatemigration.
67-67: ConsistentSignaturemethod inUpdatemigrationThe
Signaturemethod return value is set to"DummySignature", ensuring uniformity across different migrations.database/migration/repository_test.go (4)
6-6: Addition of the mock package is appropriateImporting
"github.com/stretchr/testify/mock"enhances the mocking capabilities in your tests and is appropriate for the added functionality.
55-57: Consistent error handling usingRunAndReturnAs mentioned earlier, refactoring the error handling with
RunAndReturnimproves clarity and ensures that the error is appropriately captured and returned in your transaction mocks.
77-84: Refactor error handling in transaction mockThe error handling pattern here mirrors previous instances. For consistency and reliability, consider refactoring using
RunAndReturnas suggested before.
168-168: Updated repository initialization is appropriatePassing
schemadirectly toNewRepositoryenhances clarity by aligning with the updated constructor requirements. Ensure that theNewRepositoryfunction expectsschemaas its first parameter and that this change is propagated throughout the codebase.database/migration/schema_test.go (5)
6-6: Added imports are appropriate and necessaryThe new imports at lines 6 and 11 for
github.com/stretchr/testify/mockandgithub.aaakk.us.kg/goravel/framework/contracts/database/ormare essential for the mocking functionalities introduced in the tests.Also applies to: 11-11
39-39: Improved test function naming enhances clarityRenaming
TestDropIfExiststoTestCreate_DropIfExists_HasTableimproves readability by clearly indicating the multiple operations being tested within this function.
80-80: Test function renaming improves descriptivenessChanging
TestTabletoTestTable_GetTablesprovides better insight into the test's purpose, indicating that it covers both table creation and retrieval.
154-180: New testTestSqlsuccessfully adds coverageThe addition of the
TestSqlfunction enhances the test suite by validating custom SQL execution within the schema context and verifying its effects.
184-185: UpdatedinitSchemafunction utilizesmockOrmcorrectlyIncluding
mockOrmin theinitSchemafunction ensures that the schema is initialized with the proper ORM mock, which is necessary for the updated tests.database/gorm/test_utils.go (2)
56-68: Initialization inNewTestQueriesis efficient and conditionalThe adjustments in the
NewTestQueriesfunction optimize the initialization ofTestQueries. By conditionally initializingmysqlDockersandsqlserverDockersonly whensupportdocker.TestModelis notTestModelMinimum, the code conserves resources and enhances performance during minimal testing scenarios.
75-112: Method signature and logic update inQueriesOfReadWriteare appropriateThe change in the return type of
QueriesOfReadWritefrommap[contractsdatabase.Driver]map[string]orm.Querytomap[contractsdatabase.Driver]map[string]*TestQueryaligns with the updated structure of theTestQueryclass. The method correctly constructs thequeriesmap, and conditionally includesMysqlandSqlserverdrivers based on theTestModelconfiguration. This ensures the method is flexible and supports different testing models effectively.database/gorm/query_test.go (1)
3655-3663: Incorrect assertion due to potential data inconsistencyThe assertion
assert.True(t, user2.ID == 0)assumes that the user does not exist in the read database. However, without proper synchronization or data replication between the write and read databases, this assumption may not hold true in all cases.Ensure that the read and write databases are correctly configured for read-write separation and that data written to the write database is not immediately visible in the read database. You might want to verify the database configurations and the timing of data replication.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
database/migration/schema_test.go (2)
Line range hint
75-145: Test method improved, but contains unused code.The renaming of the test method to
TestTable_GetTablesand the use of transaction mocks improve the test's clarity and isolation, consistent with the changes in the previous method.However, there's a large block of commented-out code (lines 98-145) that appears to be placeholder for future implementations. While it's common to keep notes for future work, large blocks of commented code can clutter the file and make it harder to read.
Consider removing the commented-out code and creating separate issues or TODO comments for the planned enhancements. This will keep the test file clean and focused on the current implementation while ensuring that future work is not forgotten.
For example, you could add a TODO comment like:
// TODO: Implement additional tests for column operations (HasColumn, GetColumns) // TODO: Implement tests for table modifications (adding/changing columns)These TODO comments could be linked to GitHub issues for better tracking.
Line range hint
1-179: Overall improvement in test structure and coverage.The changes to this test file represent a significant improvement in the testing approach for the Schema functionality:
- Extensive use of mocks and transactions provides better isolation for each test case.
- Renaming of test methods (e.g.,
TestCreate_DropIfExists_HasTable,TestTable_GetTables) improves clarity about what each test is verifying.- Addition of new test cases (e.g.,
TestSql) enhances overall coverage of the Schema functionality.- Consistent use of transaction mocks across test methods improves the reliability and repeatability of tests.
These changes contribute to a more robust and maintainable test suite, which is crucial for ensuring the reliability of the migration framework.
To further improve the test suite:
- Consider adding more edge cases and error scenarios to ensure the Schema handles various situations correctly.
- As the commented-out code suggests, implement tests for more advanced Schema operations (e.g., column modifications) when those features are ready.
- Consider measuring and tracking test coverage to identify any remaining gaps in the test suite.
database/migration/sql_driver_test.go (2)
26-28: Clarify the skip message in the test.In the
TestSqlDriverSuitefunction, the skip message could be clearer. Consider rephrasing it for better understanding.You can update the skip message as follows:
if env.IsWindows() { - t.Skip("Skipping tests of using docker") + t.Skip("Skipping tests that use Docker on Windows") }
37-39: Remove the emptySetupTestmethod if not needed.The
SetupTestmethod is currently empty. If no setup is required before each test, you can remove this method to keep the code clean.-func (s *SqlDriverSuite) SetupTest() { - -}database/migration/repository_test.go (1)
71-78: Simplify repository setup in testsIn the
TestRecordfunction, the logic checking if the repository exists and creating it if it doesn't can be streamlined. Since you control the test environment, consider ensuring the repository is always created at the start of the test or in theSetupTestmethod. This simplification can make your tests more straightforward and focused.database/migration/default_driver_test.go (2)
19-19: Consider renamingvalueto a more descriptive nameThe field
valuein theDefaultDriverSuitestruct is quite generic. Renaming it to something more descriptive likemigrationCountorexecutionCountwould enhance code readability and maintainability.
245-247: ImplementDown()methods to test migration rollbacksThe
Down()methods for bothTestMigrationandTestConnectionMigrationare currently empty. Implementing these methods would allow you to test the rollback functionality of your migrations, ensuring that they can be reverted if an error occurs or if a rollback is necessary.Also applies to: 265-267
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- database/console/migration/migrate_command.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/default_driver_test.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/repository_test.go (4 hunks)
- database/migration/schema_test.go (3 hunks)
- database/migration/sql_driver_test.go (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- database/console/migration/migrate_command.go
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (6)
database/migration/schema_test.go (4)
6-13: LGTM: Import statements updated correctly.The new imports for "mock" and "orm" packages are appropriate for the changes made in the test file. These additions support the use of mock objects in the updated test cases.
147-171: LGTM: New TestSql method adds valuable coverage.The new
TestSqlmethod is a great addition to the test suite. It effectively tests theSqlmethod of the Schema by creating a table, executing a SQL insert statement, and verifying the result. The use of transaction mocks is consistent with other test methods, maintaining good isolation.This test enhances the overall coverage of the Schema functionality and helps ensure that direct SQL execution works as expected within the migration framework.
173-179: LGTM: initSchema function updated to use mocks.The changes to the
initSchemafunction are well-aligned with the overall shift towards using mocks in the test suite. By returning a mock ORM (*mocksorm.Orm) instead of a real one, this function now provides better control over the test environment and allows for more isolated testing of the Schema functionality.The updated signature and implementation contribute to the improved testability of the Schema package.
Line range hint
1-179: Excellent improvements to the Schema test suite.This pull request significantly enhances the quality and robustness of the Schema test suite. The consistent use of mocks, improved test isolation through transactions, and addition of new test cases all contribute to a more comprehensive and reliable set of tests.
The changes demonstrate a thoughtful approach to testing, with clear naming conventions and a good balance between testing individual methods and overall functionality. The shift towards using mocks allows for more controlled and predictable test environments, which is particularly valuable for database-related functionality.
While there are a few minor suggestions for improvement (such as handling of commented-out code and potential refinement of error handling in mocks), the overall direction and quality of these changes are excellent.
Great job on improving the test suite! These changes will contribute to the long-term maintainability and reliability of the migration framework.
database/migration/repository_test.go (1)
162-162: Improved repository initializationPassing
schemadirectly toNewRepositoryenhances the clarity and simplicity of the repository initialization.database/migration/default_driver_test.go (1)
143-143: Compare migrations using identifiers instead of pointersComparing pointers to new instances may not yield the expected result because they point to different memory addresses. It's better to compare using a unique identifier, such as the
Signature()method.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (13)
database/console/migration/migrate_status_command_test.go (1)
33-33: LGTM: Improved test migration setup.The change to use
migration.CreateTestMigrations(driver)instead ofcreateMigrations(driver)is a good improvement. It likely provides a more structured and reusable approach to setting up test migrations.Consider adding a comment or documentation for the
CreateTestMigrationsfunction if it doesn't already exist, explaining its purpose and any specific behaviors testers should be aware of.database/console/migration/migrate_refresh_command_test.go (3)
29-33: LGTM: Improved mock setup with explicit expectationsThe mock configuration has been enhanced with explicit expectations for database migration parameters. The use of
EXPECT()method improves clarity and maintainability of the test setup.Consider extracting the magic strings (e.g., "database.migrations.table") into constants for better maintainability. For example:
const ( ConfigKeyMigrationsTable = "database.migrations.table" ConfigKeyMigrationsDriver = "database.migrations.driver" ) // Then use these constants in the test: mockConfig.EXPECT().GetString(ConfigKeyMigrationsTable).Return("migrations") mockConfig.EXPECT().GetString(ConfigKeyMigrationsDriver).Return(contractsmigration.DriverSql)
54-60: LGTM: Comprehensive setup for testing with step optionThe creation of fresh mocks and explicit setup of expectations for the step option enhances the test's clarity and isolation. The consistent instantiation and assertion of
migrateCommandmaintain the improved robustness introduced earlier.Consider extracting the magic string "step" into a constant for better maintainability:
const OptionStep = "step" // Then use this constant in the test: mockContext.EXPECT().Option(OptionStep).Return("5").Once()
74-77: LGTM: Thorough test for MigrateRefreshCommand with --seed flag and no --seederThis test case comprehensively verifies the behavior when the --seed flag is set without specifying a --seeder. The expectations for step, seed, and seeder options are clearly defined, and the correct artisan call is verified.
To improve consistency and reduce duplication, consider extracting the option names into constants:
const ( OptionStep = "step" OptionSeed = "seed" OptionSeeder = "seeder" ) // Then use these constants in the test: mockContext.EXPECT().Option(OptionStep).Return("").Once() mockContext.EXPECT().OptionBool(OptionSeed).Return(true).Once() mockContext.EXPECT().OptionSlice(OptionSeeder).Return([]string{}).Once()This approach would make the tests more maintainable and less prone to typos.
database/migration/test_utils.go (4)
14-17: LGTM: Agent struct looks good. Consider adding documentation.The
Agentstruct is well-defined and follows ORM conventions. However, it would be beneficial to add a comment explaining the purpose of this struct and its fields.Consider adding a comment like this:
// Agent represents an agent entity in the database. // It embeds orm.Model to include standard fields like ID, CreatedAt, and UpdatedAt. type Agent struct { orm.Model Name string }
19-19: LGTM: Function renamed appropriately. Consider adding documentation.The renaming of
createMigrationstoCreateTestMigrationsclarifies its purpose and makes it accessible outside the package. This change aligns well with the function's role in creating test migrations.Consider adding a comment to document the function:
// CreateTestMigrations generates test migration files based on the provided database driver. // It supports Postgres, MySQL, SQL Server, and SQLite databases. func CreateTestMigrations(driver database.Driver) { // ... (existing code) }
125-129: LGTM: mockTransaction function added. Consider refining mock expectations.The
mockTransactionfunction is a useful addition for testing database transactions. It correctly sets up the mock expectation for the Transaction method.Consider the following suggestions to enhance the function:
- Add documentation to explain the purpose and usage of this function.
- Consider using more specific matchers instead of
mock.Anythingif the expected input is known.- Add a return value to indicate if the mock setup was successful.
Here's an example of how you might implement these suggestions:
// mockTransaction sets up a mock transaction on the provided mock ORM. // It returns true if the mock was set up successfully, false otherwise. func mockTransaction(mockOrm *mocksorm.Orm, testQuery *gorm.TestQuery) bool { mockOrm.EXPECT().Transaction(mock.MatchedBy(func(f func(contractsorm.Query) error) bool { // Add any specific checks for the transaction function if needed return true })).RunAndReturn(func(txFunc func(contractsorm.Query) error) error { return txFunc(testQuery.Query()) }).Once() return true }
Line range hint
1-129: Consider reorganizing the file structure for improved readability.The file structure is generally good, with related functions grouped together. However, consider the following suggestions to improve organization and readability:
- Group all type definitions (like the
Agentstruct) at the top of the file, after the imports.- Place exported functions (like
CreateTestMigrations) before unexported ones.- Consider grouping helper functions (like
mockTransaction) together, possibly in a separate file if they grow in number.Here's a suggested order:
- Package declaration
- Imports
- Type definitions (Agent struct)
- Exported functions (CreateTestMigrations)
- Unexported functions (createMysqlMigrations, etc.)
- Helper functions (mockTransaction)
This organization will make the file easier to navigate and understand at a glance.
database/migration/repository_test.go (3)
44-44: Improved query expectation consistencyThe use of
testQuery.Query()improves consistency across test cases. However, as suggested in a previous review, consider abstracting this repeated expectation into a helper function to further reduce code duplication.Example helper function:
func expectQuery(mockOrm *mocksorm.Orm, testQuery *gorm.TestQuery) { mockOrm.EXPECT().Query().Return(testQuery.Query()).Once() }
72-73: Consistent query expectations, but room for improvementThe consistent setup of query expectations throughout the file improves readability. However, this introduces repetitive code. Consider further refactoring by introducing a helper function for setting up query expectations, as suggested in a previous comment.
Example helper function:
func expectQuery(mockOrm *mocksorm.Orm, testQuery *gorm.TestQuery) { mockOrm.EXPECT().Query().Return(testQuery.Query()).Once() }This would allow you to replace each pair of lines with a single call to
expectQuery(mockOrm, testQuery).Also applies to: 77-78, 82-83, 87-88, 93-94, 99-100, 105-106, 116-117, 127-128, 136-137, 141-142
Line range hint
1-153: Overall: Significant improvements with room for further refinementThe changes in this file have significantly improved the structure, readability, and consistency of the tests. The introduction of
mockTransactionand the streamlined error handling approach have addressed previous review comments and enhanced the overall quality of the test suite.However, there are still opportunities for further refinement:
Consider introducing helper functions for common operations like setting up query expectations. This would further reduce code duplication and improve maintainability.
While the current changes have improved consistency, some repetitive patterns (like query expectations) could be further abstracted.
These suggestions aside, the current changes represent a substantial improvement to the test file and are ready for approval.
database/migration/sql_driver_test.go (2)
37-39: Remove the emptySetupTestmethod to clean up the codeThe
SetupTestmethod is currently empty and doesn't serve any purpose. Removing it will make the code cleaner and more maintainable.
95-96: Add a comment to explain the repeatedsqlDriver.Run()callIn the
TestRunmethod,sqlDriver.Run()is called a second time after the initial migration run. If this is intended to test idempotency or ensure that running migrations multiple times does not produce errors, consider adding a comment to clarify the purpose of this second call.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
- database/console/migration/migrate_fresh_command_test.go (2 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_refresh_command_test.go (2 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_reset_command_test.go (2 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_rollback_command_test.go (2 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_status_command_test.go (2 hunks)
- database/migration/default_driver_test.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/repository_test.go (3 hunks)
- database/migration/schema_test.go (2 hunks)
- database/migration/sql_driver_test.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/test_utils.go (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- database/console/migration/migrate_fresh_command_test.go
- database/console/migration/migrate_reset_command_test.go
- database/migration/default_driver_test.go
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (29)
database/console/migration/migrate_status_command_test.go (5)
4-4: LGTM: New imports enhance test capabilities.The added imports for
fmt,require,contractsmigration, andmocksmigrationare appropriate for the changes made in the test function. They provide necessary functionality for improved mocking and assertions.Also applies to: 8-8, 10-10, 12-12, 14-14
29-31: LGTM: Enhanced mock configuration for migration settings.The new mock expectations for
mockConfigappropriately simulate the retrieval of essential migration settings (table name, driver, and charset). This ensures that the test accurately reflects the behavior of the migration command with respect to configuration.
36-36: LGTM: Added mock schema enhances test coverage.The addition of
mockSchemausingmocksmigration.NewSchema(t)is a good improvement. It allows for more comprehensive testing of the migration command by mocking the schema interactions.
38-39: LGTM: Updated NewMigrateCommand call and added assertion.The changes to the
NewMigrateCommandcall, including the addition ofmockSchemaas a parameter, are consistent with the earlier modifications. The new assertionrequire.NotNil(t, migrateCommand)adds an extra layer of confidence to the test by ensuring the command is properly created.
Line range hint
1-53: Overall: Excellent improvements to the migration status command test.The changes in this file significantly enhance the test coverage and robustness of the migrate status command test. Key improvements include:
- Addition of necessary imports for extended functionality.
- Enhanced mock configurations for migration settings.
- Structured approach to creating test migrations.
- Introduction of a mock schema for comprehensive testing.
- Updated method signature and assertions for the migrate command.
These changes align well with the modifications in the migration command implementation and provide a more thorough testing framework.
database/console/migration/migrate_rollback_command_test.go (8)
4-4: LGTM: New imports enhance test capabilitiesThe added imports for
fmt,require,contractsmigration, andmocksmigrationare appropriate for the updated test logic. They provide better support for error handling, assertions, and mocking in the test suite.Also applies to: 8-8, 10-10, 12-12, 14-14
29-32: LGTM: Mock expectations properly set upThe new mock expectations for
mockConfigare well-defined. They correctly set up the expected behavior for retrieving the migration table name, driver, and database charset. The use ofOnce()for each expectation ensures that these methods are called exactly once during the test, which is a good practice for precise test behavior.
33-33: LGTM: Improved test migration setupThe change from
createMigrations(driver)tomigration.CreateTestMigrations(driver)is a good improvement. This likely indicates a move towards a more structured and reusable approach for setting up test migrations, which can enhance consistency across different tests.
36-36: LGTM: Updated mock syntax for better clarityThe change from
mockContext.On("Option", "step")tomockContext.EXPECT().Option("step")is a good update. This new syntax aligns with modern mocking frameworks and provides better clarity in setting up expectations for the mock object.
44-44: LGTM: More specific type for agent variableThe change from
var agent Agenttovar agent migration.Agentis a good improvement. It specifies a more precise type for theagentvariable, aligning it with the migration package. This change enhances type safety and makes the code more explicit about its dependencies.
52-52: LGTM: Consistent type update for agent1 variableThe change from
var agent1 Agenttovar agent1 migration.Agentis consistent with the previous change to theagentvariable. This maintains consistency throughout the test file and properly aligns the variable type with the migration package.
Line range hint
1-57: Overall assessment: Excellent improvements to the test suiteThe changes made to this test file significantly enhance its clarity, consistency, and functionality. The updates align well with the PR objectives of optimizing the migration command. Key improvements include:
- Addition of necessary imports for better testing capabilities.
- More precise mock expectations for configuration settings.
- Adoption of a structured approach for creating test migrations.
- Updated mock syntax for improved clarity.
- Introduction of a mock schema object, suggesting enhanced flexibility in the migration command.
- More specific typing for agent variables, improving type safety.
These changes reflect updates in the underlying implementation and demonstrate good test coverage. The test suite is now better equipped to validate the behavior of the migrate rollback command.
38-41: LGTM: Added mockSchema for enhanced testingThe addition of
mockSchemaand passing it toNewMigrateCommandis a good enhancement. It suggests that the migration command now has more flexibility or functionality related to database schemas.Please ensure that the
NewMigrateCommandfunction signature has been updated accordingly in its implementation. You can verify this with the following script:✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: Updated
NewMigrateCommandSignature ConfirmedThe
NewMigrateCommandfunction signature has been successfully updated to include theschema migration.Schemaparameter as shown in the provided output. This confirms that the addition ofmockSchemaaligns with the function's new requirements.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the updated signature of NewMigrateCommand # Test: Search for the NewMigrateCommand function definition rg --type go -A 5 'func NewMigrateCommand\('Length of output: 520
database/console/migration/migrate_refresh_command_test.go (5)
8-14: LGTM: Import statements updated appropriatelyThe new imports, including
requirefrom testify and various migration-related packages, align well with the changes in the test file. These additions suggest improved test assertions and updated mock structures.
40-41: LGTM: Improved migrateCommand instantiation and assertionThe update to include
mockSchemain theNewMigrateCommandcall reflects changes in the underlying implementation. The additional assertionrequire.NotNil(t, migrateCommand)enhances the test's robustness by ensuring the command is properly instantiated before proceeding with further tests.
45-45: LGTM: Explicit test case for MigrateRefreshCommand without --seed flagThe addition of
mockContext.EXPECT().OptionBool("seed").Return(false).Once()makes the test case more explicit about testing the command's behavior when the --seed flag is not set. This improves the test's clarity and coverage.
64-66: LGTM: Comprehensive test for MigrateRefreshCommand with --seed and --seeder flagsThe test case now explicitly verifies the behavior when both --seed and --seeder flags are set. The expectations for the seed and seeder options, along with the verification of the correct artisan call, provide thorough coverage of this scenario. The consistent use of the
EXPECT()method maintains the improved clarity of the test setup.
70-71: LGTM: Consistent setup for final test caseThe creation of fresh mock artisan and context objects for the final test case maintains consistency with the approach used in previous scenarios. This practice ensures proper isolation between test cases, preventing any potential interference from previous mock configurations.
database/migration/test_utils.go (1)
4-5: LGTM: New imports are appropriate.The added imports are relevant to the new functionality introduced in this file, including mocking capabilities and ORM-related structures.
Also applies to: 7-10
database/migration/repository_test.go (5)
40-42: LGTM: Improved transaction mocking and error handlingThe introduction of
mockTransactionaddresses the previous suggestion to refactor error handling in transaction mocks. The removal of explicit error checking forCreateRepositorysuggests a shift in error handling strategy, which appears to be in line with the overall changes in this PR.
48-50: LGTM: Consistent use of mockTransactionThe use of
mockTransactionand the removal of explicit error checking forDeleteRepositoryare consistent with the changes made earlier in the file. This approach simplifies the test structure and aligns with the new error handling strategy.
64-69: LGTM: Improved test setup logicThe changes in this segment improve the test setup by conditionally creating the repository if it doesn't exist. The use of
mockTransactionand the direct call toCreateRepositoryare consistent with the new patterns established earlier in the file. This approach ensures a more robust test environment.
108-108: LGTM: Improved code readabilityThe addition of blank lines after variable assignments improves the overall readability of the code by clearly separating logical blocks. This change is consistent throughout the file and adheres to good coding practices.
Also applies to: 119-119, 130-130
153-153: LGTM: Simplified repository initializationThe modification to pass
schemadirectly toNewRepositorysimplifies theinitRepositoryfunction and improves code clarity. This change is consistent with the overall trend of streamlining the test code in this file.database/migration/schema_test.go (5)
Line range hint
1-15: LGTM: Import changes are appropriate.The new imports for mock and orm packages are correctly added and align with the changes made in the test suite.
158-164: LGTM: initSchema function improvements enhance flexibility and testability.The changes to the
initSchemafunction, including the updated signature and the creation of the mock ORM within the function, improve its flexibility and testability. The mock ORM creation and expectation setting appear correct.One minor suggestion for clarity:
Consider adding a comment explaining why the Name method is expected to be called twice. This would help future maintainers understand the reasoning behind this expectation.
Line range hint
1-164: LGTM: Improved overall test structure and organizationThe changes to this file have significantly improved the test suite:
- Test methods are now better named, clearly indicating their purpose.
- New test cases have been added, increasing overall coverage.
- The extensive use of mock objects enhances test isolation.
- There's a consistent pattern in how tests are structured across different methods.
These improvements make the test suite more comprehensive, easier to understand, and maintain.
To further enhance the test suite:
- Consider adding more edge cases to each test method to ensure robust coverage.
- Implement consistent error handling across all mocked transactions, as discussed in previous comments.
- Document any complex mock setups or test scenarios to aid future maintenance.
Line range hint
66-134: Improved test structure, but consider error handling and future improvements.The renaming of the test method to
TestTable_GetTablesand the use of transaction mocks enhance the test's clarity and isolation. The test logic for checking table creation and verifying the number of tables is comprehensive.However, there are a few points to consider:
The potential issue with error handling in mocked transactions persists, similar to the previous method. Consider implementing the suggested fix from the previous comment.
There are several commented-out test cases at the end of the method. These suggest potential future improvements or pending implementations.
To address these points:
Implement the suggested fix for error handling in mocked transactions.
Regarding the commented-out test cases:
- Are these planned for future implementation?
- If so, consider creating GitHub issues to track these pending improvements.
- If not, consider removing the commented code to maintain cleanliness.
Run the following script to check for any TODO comments related to these improvements:
This will help identify if there are any tracked TODOs related to these commented-out tests.
Line range hint
1-164: Clarification needed: Removal of mockTransaction functionThe
mockTransactionfunction seems to have been removed from the file. This change might be related to the potential error handling issues mentioned in previous comments.Could you please clarify:
- Why was the
mockTransactionfunction removed?- How is transaction mocking now handled in the test cases?
- Does this change address the potential error handling issues in mocked transactions?
To help investigate this change, you can run the following command to see the git history of the
mockTransactionfunction:This will help understand when and why the function was removed, which can provide context for the current implementation.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
📑 Description
The migrate command supports two migration drivers:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
SchemaandOrminterfaces for improved database interaction.Agenttype andCreateTestMigrationsfunction introduced for migration management.Bug Fixes
Tests
DefaultDriver,SqlDriver, andDefaultCreatorto ensure robust functionality.Chores
✅ Checks