-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 88
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: [#280] optimize make:migration command #672
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce a test suite for database migration drivers in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️
Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.50
.
Benchmark suite | Current: 3fdbea9 | Previous: fe51fc9 | Ratio |
---|---|---|---|
BenchmarkFile_ReadWrite |
247485 ns/op 1801 B/op 21 allocs/op |
161768 ns/op 1800 B/op 21 allocs/op |
1.53 |
BenchmarkFile_ReadWrite - ns/op |
247485 ns/op |
161768 ns/op |
1.53 |
This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #672 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 70.46% 70.37% -0.10%
==========================================
Files 187 189 +2
Lines 11973 11950 -23
==========================================
- Hits 8437 8410 -27
- Misses 2954 2959 +5
+ Partials 582 581 -1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 11
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (40)
contracts/database/migration/driver.go (3)
9-12
: LGTM! Consider enhancing method documentation.The new methods
Create
andRun
are well-defined and align with the PR objectives. The interface design is clean and follows Go conventions.To improve clarity, consider expanding the method documentation:
type Driver interface { - // Create a new migration file. + // Create generates a new migration file with the given name. + // It returns an error if the file creation fails. Create(name string) error - // Run the migrations according to paths. + // Run executes the migrations specified by the given paths. + // It returns an error if any migration fails to run. Run(paths []string) error }These expanded comments provide more context about the methods' behavior and error conditions.
Line range hint
3-6
: LGTM! Consider standardizing constant naming.The constants
DriverDefault
andDriverSql
clearly define the supported driver types, aligning with the PR objectives.For improved consistency with Go naming conventions, consider:
const ( DriverDefault = "default" - DriverSql = "sql" + DriverSQL = "sql" )This change capitalizes "SQL" in
DriverSQL
, which is the standard way to write acronyms in Go.
Missing Implementations for
Create
andRun
MethodsThe verification script did not find implementations of the
Create
andRun
methods in the driver classes. Please ensure that bothDefaultCreator
andSqlCreator
classes implement these methods as defined in theDriver
interface.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-13
: Overall, excellent changes that align with PR objectives.The modifications to the
Driver
interface and the addition of driver constants provide a solid foundation for implementing the two drivers mentioned in the PR objectives. The code is clean, well-structured, and follows Go conventions.To ensure completeness:
Please run the following script to verify that the new interface methods are implemented in the corresponding driver classes:
This will help confirm that the
DefaultCreator
andSqlCreator
classes mentioned in the PR objectives properly implement these new methods.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the new Driver interface methods are implemented. # Test: Search for implementations of the Create and Run methods echo "Searching for Create method implementations:" ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func ($v $_) Create(name string) error { $$ }' echo "Searching for Run method implementations:" ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func ($v $_) Run(paths []string) error { $$ }'Length of output: 349
database/console/migration/utils.go (3)
11-13
: LGTM: Function signature and initial logic are well-structured.The
GetDriver
function has a clear signature and follows Go conventions. It correctly uses theconfig
parameter to retrieve the driver type.Consider adding a check for an empty driver string to provide a more specific error message:
if driver == "" { return nil, fmt.Errorf("migration driver not specified in configuration") }This would help distinguish between unspecified and unsupported drivers.
14-26
: LGTM: Driver handling logic is well-implemented.The switch statement effectively handles different driver types, and the error handling for unsupported drivers is appropriate. The retrieval of additional configuration for the SQL driver is well-implemented.
Consider adding error checking for the SQL driver configuration retrieval:
case contractsmigration.DriverSql: connection := config.GetString("database.default") if connection == "" { return nil, fmt.Errorf("default database connection not specified") } dbDriver := config.GetString(fmt.Sprintf("database.connections.%s.driver", connection)) if dbDriver == "" { return nil, fmt.Errorf("database driver not specified for connection: %s", connection) } charset := config.GetString(fmt.Sprintf("database.connections.%s.charset", connection)) // charset can be optional, so no need to check for empty string return migration.NewSqlDriver(dbDriver, charset), nilThis addition would provide more specific error messages if the required configuration is missing.
1-26
: Overall assessment: Well-implemented feature with minor suggestions for improvement.The
GetDriver
function effectively supports multiple migration drivers as per the PR objectives. The code is clear, concise, and follows Go best practices. The suggested improvements for error handling will enhance the robustness of the function.To further improve the implementation:
- Consider adding unit tests to verify the behavior of the
GetDriver
function with different configuration scenarios.- Ensure that the
contractsmigration.Driver
interface is well-defined and documented to support easy addition of new drivers in the future.- Update the package documentation to explain the purpose of this utility function and how it fits into the overall migration system.
Great job on implementing this feature!
database/console/migration/migrate_command_test.go (1)
40-40
: LGTM! Good practice to clean up after test execution.The addition of the deferred call to remove the "database" file ensures proper cleanup after test execution, which is a good practice. This prevents leftover artifacts from affecting subsequent tests or the system state.
Consider wrapping the
file.Remove
call in a separate function to handle potential errors more gracefully. For example:defer func() { err := file.Remove("database") if err != nil { t.Logf("Failed to remove database file: %v", err) } }()This approach provides more detailed error information if the removal fails, which could be helpful for debugging.
database/console/migration/migrate_reset_command_test.go (1)
37-38
: LGTM: Cleanup step added to improve test isolation.The addition of a deferred cleanup step is a good practice to ensure the test environment is reset after each run. This improves test isolation and prevents potential interference between test runs.
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this cleanup step. Also, you might want to log any error that occurs during cleanup, even if it doesn't cause the test to fail. Here's a suggested improvement:
+ // Clean up the test database directory - defer assert.Nil(t, file.Remove("database")) + defer func() { + err := file.Remove("database") + if err != nil { + t.Logf("Failed to remove test database directory: %v", err) + } + assert.Nil(t, err) + }()This change will log any cleanup errors, providing more context if the cleanup fails, while still causing the test to fail in such cases.
database/console/migration/migrate_status_command_test.go (1)
40-40
: Cleanup improves test isolation, but consider enhancing error handling.The addition of the deferred cleanup statement is a good practice. It ensures that the "database" directory is removed after the test, improving test isolation.
However, if the cleanup fails, the error might be silently ignored as it's part of a deferred statement. Consider logging any error that occurs during cleanup.
Here's a suggestion to improve error handling:
- defer assert.Nil(t, file.Remove("database")) + defer func() { + err := file.Remove("database") + if err != nil { + t.Logf("Failed to remove database directory: %v", err) + } + assert.Nil(t, err) + }()This change will log any error that occurs during cleanup, making it easier to debug if issues arise.
database/console/migration/migrate_rollback_command_test.go (1)
43-44
: Cleanup defer statement is a good addition.The defer statement to remove the "database" directory after the test is a great addition for maintaining test isolation. It ensures that resources are cleaned up even if the test fails.
Consider moving this defer statement to the beginning of the function for better visibility and to ensure it's executed even if the function panics early. For example:
func TestMigrateRollbackCommand(t *testing.T) { defer func() { assert.Nil(t, file.Remove("database")) }() // Rest of the test function }This placement is a common Go idiom and can help prevent resource leaks in case of early returns or panics.
database/console/migration/migrate_command.go (1)
Line range hint
41-61
: LGTM with a minor suggestion: Handle method implementation.The
Handle
method is well-implemented with clear logic flow, comprehensive error handling, and user-friendly color output. It correctly executes migrations and provides appropriate feedback.A minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider adding more specific error messages for different failure scenarios. For example:
if err = m.Up(); err != nil && !errors.Is(err, migrate.ErrNoChange) { - color.Red().Println("Migration failed:", err.Error()) + if errors.Is(err, migrate.ErrDirty) { + color.Red().Println("Migration failed: Database is in a dirty state. Please fix and rerun.") + } else { + color.Red().Println("Migration failed:", err.Error()) + } return nil }This would provide more specific guidance to users in case of a dirty database state, which is a common issue with migrations.
database/migration/default_creator.go (4)
13-18
: LGTM: DefaultCreator struct and constructor are well-defined.The
DefaultCreator
struct and its constructorNewDefaultCreator
are simple and straightforward. However, consider adding a comment to the struct explaining its purpose and potential for future expansion.Consider adding a comment to the
DefaultCreator
struct:// DefaultCreator handles the creation and management of migration files. // It may be expanded in the future to include additional functionality. type DefaultCreator struct { }
20-31
: Improve method documentation for GetStub.While the method logic is clear, it would benefit from a more detailed comment explaining the parameters and return value.
Consider updating the comment as follows:
// GetStub returns the appropriate migration stub file based on the given parameters. // If table is empty, it returns an empty stub. // If create is true, it returns a creation stub, otherwise an update stub. // // Parameters: // - table: string - the name of the table for the migration // - create: bool - flag indicating whether to create a new migration or update an existing one // // Returns: // - string - the content of the selected stub file func (r *DefaultCreator) GetStub(table string, create bool) string { // ... (existing implementation) }
33-39
: Enhance PopulateStub method documentation and consider using a map for replacements.The method logic is clear, but it could benefit from more detailed documentation and a slight refactoring for better maintainability.
- Improve the method comment:
// PopulateStub replaces placeholders in the migration stub with actual values. // It replaces "DummyMigration" with a formatted version of the name (prefixed with "m_" and studly-cased), // and "DummyName" with the name itself. // // Parameters: // - stub: string - the original stub content // - name: string - the name to be used in replacements // // Returns: // - string - the populated stub with placeholders replaced func (r *DefaultCreator) PopulateStub(stub, name string) string { // ... (existing implementation) }
- Consider using a map for replacements to improve maintainability:
func (r *DefaultCreator) PopulateStub(stub, name string) string { replacements := map[string]string{ "DummyMigration": str.Of(name).Prepend("m_").Studly().String(), "DummyName": name, } for placeholder, value := range replacements { stub = strings.ReplaceAll(stub, placeholder, value) } return stub }This approach makes it easier to add or modify replacements in the future.
1-51
: Overall, the DefaultCreator implementation is well-structured but could benefit from some enhancements.The
DefaultCreator
struct and its methods provide a solid foundation for handling migration file creation. However, there are a few areas where the code could be improved:
- Enhance documentation throughout the file, especially for struct and method comments.
- Improve error handling, particularly in the
GetPath
method.- Consider timezone handling in the
GetFileName
method.- Refactor the
PopulateStub
method to use a map for better maintainability.Additionally, consider adding unit tests for this file to ensure the correctness of each method and to facilitate future maintenance and refactoring.
To improve the overall architecture and testability of this package, consider the following:
- Define an interface for the Creator, which
DefaultCreator
can implement. This would allow for easier mocking in tests and potential alternative implementations in the future.type Creator interface { GetStub(table string, create bool) string PopulateStub(stub, name string) string GetPath(name string) (string, error) GetFileName(name string) string }
- Use dependency injection for the
Stubs
and time-related functionality. This would make theDefaultCreator
more flexible and easier to test.type DefaultCreator struct { stubs Stubs clock Clock } func NewDefaultCreator(stubs Stubs, clock Clock) *DefaultCreator { return &DefaultCreator{ stubs: stubs, clock: clock, } }These changes would make the code more modular, testable, and aligned with SOLID principles.
database/console/migration/migrate_reset_command.go (1)
Line range hint
42-63
: Handle method implementation is solid, with a minor suggestion.The
Handle
method is well-implemented, with proper error handling and user-friendly output. The use oferrors.Is
for checkingmigrate.ErrNoChange
is a good practice.However, for consistency in error handling, consider returning the error instead of
nil
when the migration reset fails. This allows the caller to handle the error if needed.Consider modifying the error handling as follows:
if err = m.Down(); err != nil && !errors.Is(err, migrate.ErrNoChange) { color.Red().Println("Migration reset failed:", err.Error()) - return nil + return err }database/migration/driver_test.go (3)
20-29
: LGTM with a suggestion for SetupTest.The TestDriverSuite function correctly sets up the test suite. The SetupTest method initializes the drivers map appropriately. However, consider adding error handling for driver initialization.
Consider modifying SetupTest to handle potential errors during driver initialization:
func (s *DriverSuite) SetupTest() { + var err error + defaultDriver, err := NewDefaultDriver() + s.Require().NoError(err, "Failed to create default driver") + sqlDriver, err := NewSqlDriver("postgres", "utf8mb4") + s.Require().NoError(err, "Failed to create SQL driver") s.drivers = map[string]migration.Driver{ - migration.DriverDefault: NewDefaultDriver(), - migration.DriverSql: NewSqlDriver("postgres", "utf8mb4"), + migration.DriverDefault: defaultDriver, + migration.DriverSql: sqlDriver, } }This change ensures that any errors during driver initialization are caught and reported, improving the robustness of the test setup.
31-60
: LGTM with suggestions for improvement.The TestCreate function is well-structured and covers both default and SQL drivers. The use of subtests for each driver is a good practice. However, there are opportunities for improvement:
- Error handling: Add assertions for potential errors in file operations.
- More comprehensive assertions: Check file contents, not just existence.
- Consider parameterizing the test for different scenarios.
Consider the following improvements:
- Enhance error handling:
- pwd, _ := os.Getwd() + pwd, err := os.Getwd() + s.Require().NoError(err, "Failed to get working directory")
- Add content checks:
s.True(file.Exists(migrationFile)) + content, err := os.ReadFile(migrationFile) + s.Require().NoError(err, "Failed to read migration file") + s.Contains(string(content), "func Up()") + s.Contains(string(content), "func Down()")
- Parameterize the test:
testCases := []struct { name string driverName string expected []string }{ {"Default Driver", migration.DriverDefault, []string{"20240817214501_create_users_table.go"}}, {"SQL Driver", migration.DriverSql, []string{"20240817214501_create_users_table.up.sql", "20240817214501_create_users_table.down.sql"}}, } for _, tc := range testCases { s.Run(tc.name, func() { driver := s.drivers[tc.driverName] s.Require().NoError(driver.Create(name)) for _, expectedFile := range tc.expected { fullPath := filepath.Join(path, expectedFile) s.True(file.Exists(fullPath), "Expected file does not exist: %s", fullPath) // Add content checks here } }) }These changes will make the test more robust and easier to extend for future driver types.
1-60
: Overall: Well-structured test suite with room for expansion.The test suite is well-organized and covers the basic functionality of both default and SQL migration drivers. It follows testing best practices by using the testify suite, setting up and tearing down the test environment, and using subtests.
To further improve the test suite, consider:
- Adding test cases for error scenarios (e.g., invalid migration names, file system errors).
- Testing edge cases (e.g., very long migration names, special characters in names).
- Mocking the file system to avoid actual file creation during tests.
- Adding benchmarks for performance-critical operations.
To enhance the overall test architecture, consider:
- Creating a mock implementation of the
migration.Driver
interface for more isolated unit testing.- Implementing a test helper function to generate random migration names and expected file paths.
- Using a test configuration file to manage test parameters (e.g., database types, character sets) for easier maintenance and expansion.
database/console/migration/migrate_rollback_command.go (2)
Line range hint
1-13
: LGTM: Package change aligns with PR objectives.The change from
package console
topackage migration
is in line with the PR's goal of relocating migration commands to an independent folder. This should improve code organization.Consider grouping the imports into standard library, third-party, and local imports for better readability. For example:
import ( "errors" "strconv" _ "github.com/go-sql-driver/mysql" "github.com/golang-migrate/migrate/v4" _ "github.com/golang-migrate/migrate/v4/source/file" "github.com/goravel/framework/contracts/config" "github.com/goravel/framework/contracts/console" "github.com/goravel/framework/contracts/console/command" "github.com/goravel/framework/support/color" )
Line range hint
25-48
: LGTM: Command interface methods are correctly maintained.The
Signature
,Description
, andExtend
methods are appropriately preserved, maintaining the command's interface. The "migrate" category in theExtend
method aligns well with the new package structure.Consider adding a description to the "step" flag in the
Extend
method to provide more context. For example:&command.StringFlag{ Name: "step", Value: "1", Usage: "Number of migrations to roll back (default: 1)", },database/console/migration/utils_test.go (1)
48-63
: LGTM with a minor suggestion: Consider consistent naming for mock variables.The test execution loop is well-structured, using subtests for each case and properly setting up mocks, running the
GetDriver
function, and asserting results. The error checking logic is sound.A minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider declaring
mockConfig
inside the test loop for consistency and to ensure a fresh mock for each test case. This can prevent potential issues with mock expectations carrying over between tests. Here's a suggested change:- var mockConfig *mocksconfig.Config // ... for _, test := range tests { t.Run(test.name, func(t *testing.T) { - mockConfig = mocksconfig.NewConfig(t) + mockConfig := mocksconfig.NewConfig(t) // ... rest of the test case }) }This change ensures that each test case has its own isolated mock configuration.
database/console/migration/migrate_fresh_command_test.go (1)
66-67
: Deferred file removal is a good addition, consider logging errors.The deferred removal of the "database" directory is a good practice for cleaning up resources after tests. It ensures that the test environment is reset for subsequent test runs.
Consider logging any error returned by
file.Remove
. While it's good that we're checking for errors, it would be helpful to log them for debugging purposes. Here's a suggested improvement:-defer assert.Nil(t, file.Remove("database")) +defer func() { + if err := file.Remove("database"); err != nil { + t.Logf("Failed to remove database directory: %v", err) + } +}()This change will log any errors that occur during cleanup, which can be helpful for troubleshooting if tests start failing unexpectedly.
database/console/migration/migrate_refresh_command_test.go (1)
73-73
: LGTM: Good practice for test cleanup, with a minor suggestion.The addition of the deferred database file removal is a good practice for cleaning up test artifacts and resetting the test environment after each run.
Consider moving this defer statement to the beginning of the test function to ensure it runs even if the test panics:
func TestMigrateRefreshCommand(t *testing.T) { + defer assert.Nil(t, file.Remove("database")) if env.IsWindows() { t.Skip("Skipping tests of using docker") } // ... rest of the function ... - defer assert.Nil(t, file.Remove("database")) }database/console/migration/migrate_make_command_test.go (2)
28-29
: LGTM: Improved mock object instantiation.The update to use
NewConfig(t)
andNewContext(t)
methods for mock object instantiation is a good improvement. This approach likely provides better type safety and easier setup of expectations.Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the
beforeEach
function, as it's not immediately clear why it's defined separately from the test cases.
91-91
: LGTM: Improved test cleanup withdefer
.The replacement of the
afterEach
function with adefer
statement is a good improvement. This ensures that cleanup occurs once after all tests have run, which is more efficient and simplifies the test structure.Consider wrapping the cleanup logic in a separate function for better readability and reusability. For example:
defer func() { assert.Nil(t, file.Remove("database")) }()This approach allows for potential expansion of cleanup logic without cluttering the main test function.
database/console/migration/test_utils.go (6)
Line range hint
8-19
: Consider adding error handling or loggingThe
createMigrations
function looks good overall, but it might benefit from some error handling or logging. Consider the following suggestions:
- Add a default case to the switch statement to handle unsupported drivers.
- Implement logging to track which migration is being created.
- Consider returning an error instead of handling panics in the driver-specific functions.
Example:
func createMigrations(driver database.Driver) error { log.Printf("Creating migration for driver: %s", driver) switch driver { case database.DriverPostgres: return createPostgresMigrations() case database.DriverMysql: return createMysqlMigrations() case database.DriverSqlserver: return createSqlserverMigrations() case database.DriverSqlite: return createSqliteMigrations() default: return fmt.Errorf("unsupported driver: %s", driver) } }This change would improve error handling and provide better visibility into the migration creation process.
Line range hint
21-41
: Refactor migration creation for improved flexibility and error handlingThe
createMysqlMigrations
function (and similar functions for other databases) could benefit from the following improvements:
- Avoid hardcoding: Consider using configuration or parameters for file paths and table names.
- Improve error handling: Instead of panicking, return errors to allow the caller to handle them appropriately.
- Reduce duplication: Create a helper function to handle file creation for all database types.
Here's a suggested refactoring:
func createDatabaseMigrations(driver string, upSQL, downSQL string) error { timestamp := time.Now().Format("20060102150405") basePath := fmt.Sprintf("database/migrations/%s_create_agents_table", timestamp) if err := createMigrationFile(basePath+".up.sql", upSQL); err != nil { return err } return createMigrationFile(basePath+".down.sql", downSQL) } func createMigrationFile(path, content string) error { return file.Create(path, content) } func createMysqlMigrations() error { upSQL := `CREATE TABLE agents ( // ... (your SQL here) );` downSQL := `DROP TABLE agents;` return createDatabaseMigrations("mysql", upSQL, downSQL) }This approach would make the code more maintainable and less prone to errors.
Line range hint
43-63
: Apply refactoring suggestion to PostgreSQL migrationsThe
createPostgresMigrations
function has the same structure and potential improvements as discussed for the MySQL migrations. Please apply the refactoring suggestion from the previous comment to this function as well.Additionally, for PostgreSQL specifically:
- Consider using
TIMESTAMPTZ
instead oftimestamp
forcreated_at
andupdated_at
columns to handle time zones properly.- You might want to add index creation statements for
created_at
andupdated_at
columns, similar to the MySQL migration, if these indexes are needed for your application.Example PostgreSQL-specific changes:
func createPostgresMigrations() error { upSQL := `CREATE TABLE agents ( id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL, name varchar(255) NOT NULL, created_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL, updated_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL ); CREATE INDEX idx_agents_created_at ON agents (created_at); CREATE INDEX idx_agents_updated_at ON agents (updated_at); INSERT INTO agents (name, created_at, updated_at) VALUES ('goravel', NOW(), NOW());` downSQL := `DROP TABLE agents;` return createDatabaseMigrations("postgres", upSQL, downSQL) }These changes would improve consistency across different database types and optimize the schema for PostgreSQL.
Line range hint
65-84
: Optimize SQL Server migrations and apply refactoringPlease apply the refactoring suggestions from previous comments to the
createSqlserverMigrations
function. Additionally, consider the following SQL Server-specific improvements:
- Use
DATETIME2
instead ofDATETIME
for better precision and range.- Add clustered index on the primary key explicitly.
- Consider adding non-clustered indexes on
created_at
andupdated_at
columns if needed for your queries.Example SQL Server-specific changes:
func createSqlserverMigrations() error { upSQL := `CREATE TABLE agents ( id bigint NOT NULL IDENTITY(1,1), name nvarchar(255) NOT NULL, created_at datetime2 NOT NULL, updated_at datetime2 NOT NULL, CONSTRAINT PK_agents PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED (id) ); CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX idx_agents_created_at ON agents (created_at); CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX idx_agents_updated_at ON agents (updated_at); INSERT INTO agents (name, created_at, updated_at) VALUES ('goravel', GETDATE(), GETDATE());` downSQL := `DROP TABLE agents;` return createDatabaseMigrations("sqlserver", upSQL, downSQL) }These changes would optimize the schema for SQL Server and improve consistency with other database migrations.
Line range hint
86-105
: Optimize SQLite migrations and apply refactoringPlease apply the refactoring suggestions from previous comments to the
createSqliteMigrations
function. Additionally, consider the following SQLite-specific improvements:
- Use
TEXT
type forcreated_at
andupdated_at
columns, as SQLite doesn't have a built-in datetime type.- Add indexes on
created_at
andupdated_at
columns if needed for your queries.- Use the
CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
function for the default values ofcreated_at
andupdated_at
.Example SQLite-specific changes:
func createSqliteMigrations() error { upSQL := `CREATE TABLE agents ( id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT NOT NULL, name TEXT NOT NULL, created_at TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, updated_at TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP ); CREATE INDEX idx_agents_created_at ON agents (created_at); CREATE INDEX idx_agents_updated_at ON agents (updated_at); INSERT INTO agents (name) VALUES ('goravel');` downSQL := `DROP TABLE agents;` return createDatabaseMigrations("sqlite", upSQL, downSQL) }These changes would optimize the schema for SQLite and improve consistency with other database migrations while taking into account SQLite's specific features.
Line range hint
1-105
: Overall file review and summary of suggestionsThe file structure and implementation are consistent across different database types, which is good. However, there are several areas where the code could be improved:
- Error Handling: Replace panics with proper error returns and handling.
- Code Reusability: Implement a generic function for creating migration files to reduce duplication.
- Flexibility: Use configuration or parameters for file paths and table names instead of hardcoding.
- Database-Specific Optimizations: Adjust data types and indexing strategies for each database type to optimize performance and consistency.
- Logging: Add logging to track the migration creation process.
Here's a high-level example of how the refactored code structure could look:
func createMigrations(driver database.Driver) error { log.Printf("Creating migration for driver: %s", driver) migrationCreator, err := getMigrationCreator(driver) if err != nil { return err } return migrationCreator.Create() } type MigrationCreator interface { Create() error } func getMigrationCreator(driver database.Driver) (MigrationCreator, error) { switch driver { case database.DriverPostgres: return &PostgresMigrationCreator{}, nil case database.DriverMysql: return &MysqlMigrationCreator{}, nil // ... other drivers default: return nil, fmt.Errorf("unsupported driver: %s", driver) } } // Implement MigrationCreator for each database typeThese changes would significantly improve the maintainability, flexibility, and robustness of the migration creation process.
database/console/migration/migrate.go (1)
Missing Documentation for
database.migrations.table
Configuration KeyThe configuration key
database.migrations.table
is implemented in the codebase but lacks corresponding documentation. Please ensure that this configuration key is properly documented in the appropriate configuration files and documentation resources.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
47-104
: Verify the new configuration structureThe changes to the
MigrationsTable
configuration are consistent across all supported database drivers. This suggests a change in the overall configuration structure for database migrations.Please ensure that the new configuration key
database.migrations.table
is properly documented and that any necessary updates have been made to the configuration files or documentation. Run the following script to check for related changes:🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for related changes in configuration and documentation # Test: Search for the new configuration key in config files echo "Searching for new configuration key in config files:" rg --type yaml --type json "database.migrations.table" config/ # Test: Search for updates in documentation echo "Searching for updates in documentation:" rg --type md "database.migrations.table" docs/Length of output: 359
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search the entire codebase for the new configuration key and check for documentation references # Test: Search for the new configuration key across all files echo "Searching for 'database.migrations.table' in the entire codebase:" rg "database\.migrations\.table" # Test: Search for mentions of the configuration key in code comments and documentation files echo "Searching for 'database.migrations.table' in documentation or comments:" rg "database\.migrations\.table" --type md --type go --type yaml --type jsonLength of output: 2123
database/migration/sql_creator_test.go (2)
23-25
: Consider clarifying the default driver choice in SetupTest.The
SetupTest
method initializessqlCreator
with the "postgres" driver. While this works for the tests, it might be beneficial to explain why postgres is chosen as the default driver, especially since the tests cover multiple database types.Consider adding a comment explaining the choice of postgres as the default driver, or consider using a more neutral driver for the default setup if there's no specific reason for using postgres.
40-149
: LGTM: Comprehensive test cases for TestPopulateStub.The table-driven test approach is well-implemented, covering all supported database types and both create and update operations. The expected SQL statements look correct for each database type, and the test checks both "up" and "down" migration SQL.
Consider adding a test case for an unsupported database driver to ensure proper error handling. For example:
{ name: "unsupported driver", driver: "unsupported", table: "users", create: true, expectUp: "", expectDown: "", },Then, update the test to check for an error or empty string return when an unsupported driver is used:
if test.driver == "unsupported" { s.Empty(up) s.Empty(down) } else { s.Equal(test.expectUp, str.Of(up).RTrim("\n").String()) s.Equal(test.expectDown, str.Of(down).RTrim("\n").String()) }This addition would improve the test coverage by ensuring proper handling of unexpected inputs.
database/gorm/test_utils.go (1)
Line range hint
313-511
: Overall LGTM. Consider updating documentation.The changes consistently update the configuration key for the migrations table from
"database.migrations"
to"database.migrations.table"
across all supported database drivers (MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite, and SQL Server). This modification aligns well with the PR objectives of optimizing themake:migration
command.Consider updating any relevant documentation or configuration examples to reflect this change in the migration table configuration key.
database/migration/sql_driver.go (2)
7-7
: Reminder: Remove deprecated code before v1.16The
// TODO Remove in v1.16
comment indicates that this code is scheduled for removal. To keep the codebase clean and prevent deprecated code from persisting beyond the intended version, consider addressing this before the release.Would you like me to generate the necessary changes to remove this code or create a GitHub issue to track this task?
36-37
: Implement or document theRun
methodThe
Run
method currently has an empty implementation that returnsnil
. If this method is intended to execute migration files or perform specific actions, please implement the necessary functionality. If it's a placeholder for future development, consider adding a comment to indicate its intended purpose. If the method is not required, you might consider removing it to avoid confusion.Would you like assistance in implementing the
Run
method or updating the documentation to reflect its intended use?database/migration/sql_creator.go (2)
25-26
: Improve method comments for clarity and consistencyThe comments for the methods
GetPath
,GetStub
, andPopulateStub
can be improved by following Go's documentation conventions. Method comments should start with the method name and provide a clear description.Apply these diffs to adjust the comments:
-// GetPath Get the full path to the migration. +// GetPath returns the full path to the migration file.-// GetStub Get the migration stub file. +// GetStub returns the migration stub files for the specified table.-// PopulateStub Populate the place-holders in the migration stub. +// PopulateStub replaces placeholders in the migration stub with actual values.Also applies to: 32-33, 66-67
67-75
: Validate inputs inPopulateStub
methodIn the
PopulateStub
method, the placeholdersDummyDatabaseCharset
andDummyTable
are replaced withr.charset
andtable
without validation. If these variables contain unexpected values, it could lead to incorrect or malformed stubs. Consider validating or sanitizing these inputs before replacement.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
mocks/database/migration/Driver.go
is excluded by!mocks/**
📒 Files selected for processing (31)
- contracts/database/migration/driver.go (1 hunks)
- database/console/migrate_creator.go (0 hunks)
- database/console/migrate_creator_test.go (0 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate.go (5 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_command.go (1 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_command_test.go (3 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_fresh_command.go (1 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_fresh_command_test.go (3 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_make_command.go (3 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_make_command_test.go (5 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_refresh_command.go (1 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_refresh_command_test.go (3 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_reset_command.go (1 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_reset_command_test.go (3 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_rollback_command.go (1 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_rollback_command_test.go (3 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_status_command.go (1 hunks)
- database/console/migration/migrate_status_command_test.go (3 hunks)
- database/console/migration/test_utils.go (1 hunks)
- database/console/migration/utils.go (1 hunks)
- database/console/migration/utils_test.go (1 hunks)
- database/gorm/test_utils.go (4 hunks)
- database/migration/default_creator.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/default_driver.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/default_driver_test.go (0 hunks)
- database/migration/driver_test.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/sql_creator.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/sql_creator_test.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/sql_driver.go (1 hunks)
- database/migration/sql_driver_test.go (0 hunks)
- database/service_provider.go (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)
- database/console/migrate_creator.go
- database/console/migrate_creator_test.go
- database/migration/default_driver_test.go
- database/migration/sql_driver_test.go
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- database/console/migration/migrate_fresh_command.go
- database/console/migration/migrate_status_command.go
🔇 Additional comments (69)
database/console/migration/utils.go (1)
1-9
: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are well-organized.The package declaration matches the directory structure, and imports are properly organized. The use of named imports for contracts enhances code readability.
database/console/migration/migrate_command_test.go (2)
12-12
: LGTM! Import statement added for file package.The addition of the
file
package import is consistent with the changes made in the test function, specifically the new deferred call to remove the "database" file.
Line range hint
1-40
: Overall, the changes look good and align with PR objectives.The modifications to this file, including the package name change, new import, and cleanup logic, are consistent with the PR's goal of optimizing the
make:migration
command and improving code organization. The changes follow good practices and maintain the existing code style.database/console/migration/migrate_reset_command_test.go (2)
11-11
: LGTM: New import added for cleanup functionality.The addition of the
file
package import is necessary for the new cleanup step and is correctly placed within the import block.
1-1
: LGTM: Package name change aligns with PR objectives.The package name change from
console
tomigration
better reflects the content and purpose of this file, aligning with the PR objective of relocating migration commands to an independent folder.To ensure this change doesn't break existing imports, please run the following script:
Ensure that all relevant imports have been updated to use the new package path.
database/console/migration/migrate_status_command_test.go (2)
11-11
: New import supports cleanup functionality.The addition of the
file
package import is appropriate as it's used in the new cleanup functionality at the end of the test. This import is necessary and aligns with the changes made to the test function.
1-1
: Package rename improves code organization.The package rename from
console
tomigration
aligns well with the PR objective of relocating migration commands to an independent folder. This change enhances code organization and makes the package name more specific to its contents.To ensure this change doesn't break existing imports, please run the following script to check for any files still importing from the old package path:
If the script returns any results, those files will need to be updated to use the new package path.
database/console/migration/migrate_rollback_command_test.go (2)
11-11
: New import for file package is appropriate.The addition of the
file
package import is necessary for the new defer statement and follows Go's import conventions.
1-1
: Package name change looks good, verify imports in other files.The package name change from
console
tomigration
aligns well with the PR objective of relocating migration commands to an independent folder. This change improves code organization and specificity.To ensure this change doesn't break existing imports, please run the following script:
database/console/migration/migrate_command.go (4)
Line range hint
1-11
: LGTM: Package name change and imports.The package name change from
console
tomigration
aligns well with the PR objective of relocating migration commands to an independent folder. All imports are relevant and used in the code.
Line range hint
13-22
: LGTM: MigrateCommand struct and constructor.The
MigrateCommand
struct and its constructorNewMigrateCommand
are well-defined and follow Go conventions. The struct contains the necessaryconfig
field, and the constructor properly initializes it.
Line range hint
24-39
: LGTM: Command metadata methods.The
Signature
,Description
, andExtend
methods provide clear and concise metadata for themigrate
command. The categorization under "migrate" in theExtend
method aligns well with the PR objectives.
Line range hint
1-63
: Great job on the migration command refactoring!The refactoring of the
migrate
command into its own package is well-executed. The code is clean, readable, and follows Go conventions. It successfully implements the command's functionality with proper error handling and user feedback.This change aligns perfectly with the PR objectives of optimizing the
make:migration
command and relocating migration commands to an independent folder. The separation of concerns is maintained, and the overall structure of the code is improved.database/migration/default_creator.go (1)
1-11
: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package name
migration
is suitable for the file's purpose, and the imported packages are relevant to the functionality provided in the file.database/console/migration/migrate_reset_command.go (4)
Line range hint
1-11
: Package change and imports look good.The package name change to
migration
aligns with the PR objective of relocating migration commands to an independent folder. All imports are relevant and used in the code.
Line range hint
13-22
: Struct and constructor implementation is correct.The
MigrateResetCommand
struct and its constructorNewMigrateResetCommand
are well-implemented. The constructor properly initializes the struct with the provided config.
Line range hint
24-40
: Command metadata methods are well-implemented.The
Signature
,Description
, andExtend
methods provide the necessary metadata for themigrate:reset
command. They are correctly implemented and provide clear information about the command's purpose and category.
Line range hint
1-63
: Overall, excellent implementation aligning with PR objectives.This file successfully implements the
migrate:reset
command as part of the migration system. The code is well-structured, follows Go best practices, and aligns with the PR objective of relocating migration commands to an independent folder.The only suggestion for improvement is the minor change in error handling in the
Handle
method, as mentioned in the previous comment.Great job on this implementation!
database/migration/driver_test.go (2)
3-13
: LGTM: Import statements are well-organized and relevant.The import statements are logically structured and include all necessary packages for the test suite's functionality.
15-18
: LGTM: DriverSuite struct is well-defined.The DriverSuite struct is correctly defined, embedding suite.Suite and including a map of migration.Driver. This structure allows for efficient testing of multiple drivers within the same test suite.
database/console/migration/migrate_make_command.go (5)
1-10
: LGTM: Package name change and import cleanupThe package name change from
console
tomigration
aligns with the PR objective of relocating migration commands to an independent folder. The removal of unused imports is also a good practice, keeping the codebase clean.
21-23
: LGTM: Consistent receiver namingThe change of the receiver variable name from
receiver
tor
improves readability and is consistent with other methods in this file. The functionality remains unchanged.
26-35
: LGTM: Consistent receiver naming in Description and Extend methodsThe change of the receiver variable name from
receiver
tor
in bothDescription
andExtend
methods is consistent with the previous changes. The functionality of both methods remains unchanged.
38-38
: LGTM: Consistent receiver naming in Handle methodThe change of the receiver variable name from
receiver
tor
in theHandle
method is consistent with the previous changes. The method signature remains unchanged.
59-62
: LGTM: Improved migration driver handlingThe refactoring of the migration driver retrieval logic improves code readability and error handling. This change aligns with the PR objective of supporting two drivers.
Please verify the implementation of the
GetDriver
function to ensure it correctly supports both drivers as mentioned in the PR objectives. Run the following script to locate and display theGetDriver
function:✅ Verification successful
Verified: GetDriver function supports both drivers
The
GetDriver
function properly handles the selection betweenDriverDefault
andDriverSql
, aligning with the PR objectives to support two drivers.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate and display the GetDriver function # Test: Search for the GetDriver function definition ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func GetDriver($_) $_'Length of output: 1321
database/console/migration/migrate_rollback_command.go (3)
Line range hint
15-23
: LGTM: Struct and constructor remain appropriate.The
MigrateRollbackCommand
struct and its constructor are unchanged, which is appropriate as they didn't require modifications for this refactoring.
Line range hint
1-85
: Summary: Successful refactoring aligns with PR objectives.The relocation of
migrate_rollback_command.go
to themigration
package successfully achieves the PR's objective of moving migration commands to an independent folder. The existing functionality is preserved, maintaining code quality and structure.Key points:
- Package declaration updated appropriately.
- Command structure and logic remain intact.
- The change improves code organization without introducing new issues.
This refactoring contributes positively to the overall goal of optimizing the
make:migration
command and related functionality.
Line range hint
50-85
: LGTM with a concern: Handle method logic is sound, but relies on an undefined function.The
Handle
method's logic for executing the rollback command is well-structured, with appropriate error handling and user feedback. However, there's a potential issue:The method calls a
getMigrate
function which is not defined in this file. Let's verify its existence and correct import:If the function is not found, consider defining it in this file or ensuring it's properly imported from another package.
database/console/migration/utils_test.go (2)
1-11
: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are well-structured.The package declaration and imports are correctly set up for a test file in the
migration
package. The use of mock packages (mocksconfig
) indicates good testing practices, allowing for isolated testing of theGetDriver
function.
13-46
: LGTM: Well-structured table-driven tests.The
TestGetDriver
function is well-organized using table-driven tests. This approach allows for clear and concise testing of multiple scenarios. The test cases cover important scenarios:
- Default driver
- SQL driver
- Unsupported driver
This structure makes it easy to add more test cases in the future if needed.
database/service_provider.go (9)
10-10
: LGTM: New import for migration2 package.The new import statement for the
migration2
package is correctly added and aligns with the changes made in theregisterCommands
method.
57-57
: LGTM: Updated MigrateMakeCommand to use migration2 package.The change is consistent with the new import and aligns with the PR objectives to relocate migration commands to an independent folder.
58-58
: LGTM: Updated MigrateCommand to use migration2 package.This change is in line with the PR objectives and consistent with the other updates to use the new
migration2
package.
59-59
: LGTM: Updated MigrateRollbackCommand to use migration2 package.The change to use the
migration2
package for the MigrateRollbackCommand is consistent with the overall refactoring effort.
60-60
: LGTM: Updated MigrateResetCommand to use migration2 package.The MigrateResetCommand has been successfully updated to use the new
migration2
package, maintaining consistency with the other changes.
61-61
: LGTM: Updated MigrateRefreshCommand to use migration2 package.The MigrateRefreshCommand has been correctly updated to use the
migration2
package while maintaining its existing parameters (config
andartisanFacade
).
62-62
: LGTM: Updated MigrateFreshCommand to use migration2 package.The MigrateFreshCommand has been successfully updated to use the
migration2
package, maintaining its existing parameters and consistency with other changes.
57-63
: Summary: Successful migration command refactoringThe changes in this file successfully refactor all migration commands to use the new
migration2
package. This is consistent with the PR objectives to relocate migration commands to an independent folder. The refactoring maintains the existing method signatures and parameters, ensuring compatibility with the rest of the codebase.Key points:
- All migration commands (MigrateMake, Migrate, MigrateRollback, MigrateReset, MigrateRefresh, MigrateFresh, and MigrateStatus) have been updated.
- The changes are consistent across all commands.
- The new
migration2
package is correctly imported.These changes should improve the organization of the codebase and potentially set the stage for further enhancements to the migration system.
63-63
: LGTM: Updated MigrateStatusCommand to use migration2 package.The MigrateStatusCommand has been correctly updated to use the
migration2
package, consistent with all other migration command changes.To ensure all migration commands have been updated consistently, please run the following verification script:
✅ Verification successful
Action Required: Re-verify that all migration commands use the
migration2
package consistently.
Action Required: Re-verify migration commands using an enhanced verification script.
Verified: All migration commands now use the
migration2
package consistently.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all migration commands use the migration2 package # Test: Search for any remaining references to the old console package for migration commands rg --type go 'console\.New(Migrate|MigrateMake|MigrateRollback|MigrateReset|MigrateRefresh|MigrateFresh|MigrateStatus)Command' # Expected result: No output, indicating all commands have been updatedLength of output: 128
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all migration commands use the migration2 package # Test: Search for any remaining references to the old console package in migration commands rg --type go 'console\.New(Migrate|MigrateMake|MigrateRollback|MigrateReset|MigrateRefresh|MigrateFresh|MigrateStatus)Command' # Expected result: No output, indicating all commands have been updated to use migration2Length of output: 128
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Enhanced verification to ensure all migration commands use the migration2 package set -e echo "Starting verification of migration commands..." # Search for any remaining references to the old console package in migration commands matches=$(rg --type go 'console\.New(Migrate|MigrateMake|MigrateRollback|MigrateReset|MigrateRefresh|MigrateFresh|MigrateStatus)Command' || true) if [ -z "$matches" ]; then echo "Success: No references to the old console package found in migration commands." else echo "Warning: Found references to the old console package in migration commands:" echo "$matches" exit 1 fiLength of output: 443
database/console/migration/migrate_fresh_command_test.go (2)
11-11
: New import for file package is appropriate.The addition of the
file
package import is necessary for the new deferred file removal operation. It's correctly placed and follows the existing import structure.
1-1
: Package name change looks good, verify imports in other files.The package name change from
console
tomigration
aligns well with the PR objective of relocating migration commands to an independent folder. This change improves code organization and specificity.To ensure this change doesn't break existing imports, please run the following script to check for any files still importing from the old package path:
If the script returns any results, those files will need to be updated to use the new package path.
database/console/migration/migrate_refresh_command_test.go (2)
11-11
: LGTM: New import added for file operations.The addition of the
file
import from thesupport
package is appropriate as it's used in the new deferred file removal operation at the end of the test function.
1-1
: LGTM: Package name change aligns with PR objectives.The package name change from
console
tomigration
is appropriate and aligns with the PR objective of relocating migration commands to an independent folder. This change improves code organization and clarity.To ensure this change doesn't break existing imports, please run the following script to check for any files still importing the old package:
database/console/migration/migrate_make_command_test.go (4)
Line range hint
1-15
: LGTM: Package and import changes align with PR objectives.The package change from
console
tomigration
and the updated import statements correctly reflect the relocation of migration commands to an independent folder. The new imports (contractsmigration
,mocksconfig
, andmocksconsole
) are appropriate for the updated mock object instantiation and use of new driver constants.
20-21
: LGTM: Mock object type declarations updated correctly.The mock object type declarations have been appropriately updated to use the new package names (
mocksconfig
andmocksconsole
). This change is consistent with the updated import statements and reflects the new package structure.
Line range hint
1-91
: Overall, the changes look good and align with PR objectives.The modifications to this test file effectively support the PR's goals of optimizing the
make:migration
command and reorganizing migration-related code. The changes improve code structure, type safety, and test efficiency. The switch to PostgreSQL in the tests and the use of driver constants enhance the robustness of the tests.A few minor suggestions have been made for further improvement:
- Adding a comment to explain the purpose of the
beforeEach
function.- Verifying the intentionality of the configuration key change.
- Considering a slight refactor of the cleanup logic using a separate function.
These suggestions are minor and do not block the approval of this PR. Great work on improving the migration command functionality and test structure!
51-51
: LGTM: Updated driver configuration and database details.The changes to use constants (
contractsmigration.DriverDefault
andcontractsmigration.DriverSql
) for driver values improve type safety and maintainability. The switch from MySQL to PostgreSQL in the test setup is noted.Please verify that the change in the configuration key from "database.migration.driver" to "database.migrations.driver" is intentional and consistent with any changes made to the configuration structure. This change might affect other parts of the codebase that rely on this configuration key.
Also applies to: 63-66
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Configuration key change is consistent across the codebase.
All instances of the old configuration key "database.migration.driver" have been successfully replaced with "database.migrations.driver". No issues found regarding the configuration key change.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for uses of the old and new configuration keys echo "Occurrences of old key (database.migration.driver):" rg "database\.migration\.driver" echo "Occurrences of new key (database.migrations.driver):" rg "database\.migrations\.driver"Length of output: 1154
database/console/migration/migrate_refresh_command.go (5)
Line range hint
1-12
: Package name change aligns with PR objectives.The package name has been changed from
console
tomigration
, which is in line with the PR objective of relocating migration commands to an independent folder. This change improves the organization of the codebase.
Line range hint
14-25
: Constructor function addition improves code clarity.The explicit definition of the
NewMigrateRefreshCommand
constructor function is a positive change. It enhances the code's clarity and provides a clear way to initialize theMigrateRefreshCommand
struct.
Line range hint
27-57
: Command metadata methods remain appropriately unchanged.The
Signature
,Description
, andExtend
methods have been kept intact. This is correct as the basic functionality and metadata of the command haven't changed. The methods continue to provide essential information about the command's usage and options.
Line range hint
59-114
: Handle method implementation remains robust and functional.The
Handle
method has been preserved with its core logic intact. This is appropriate as the command's main functionality hasn't changed. The method continues to provide:
- Comprehensive error handling for various scenarios.
- Proper execution of migration steps based on user input.
- Conditional database seeding when the
seed
flag is provided.The preservation of this logic ensures that the command continues to function as expected while aligning with the PR's objectives.
Line range hint
1-114
: Overall changes align well with PR objectives and maintain code quality.The migration of this file to the
migration
package successfully achieves the PR objective of relocating migration commands to an independent folder. The core functionality of theMigrateRefreshCommand
has been preserved, maintaining its robustness and error handling capabilities.Key points:
- Package name changed appropriately.
- Constructor function added, improving code clarity.
- Command metadata and core logic remain intact and functional.
- No new issues introduced.
These changes contribute to better code organization without compromising the existing functionality.
database/console/migration/test_utils.go (1)
Line range hint
1-6
: Package name change looks goodThe change from
package console
topackage migration
aligns with the PR objective of relocating migration commands to an independent folder. This improves the organization of the codebase.database/console/migration/migrate.go (6)
1-1
: LGTM: Package name change improves code organizationThe package name change from
console
tomigration
aligns well with the PR objective of relocating migration commands to an independent folder. This change improves code organization and makes the purpose of this file clearer.
47-47
: LGTM: Updated config key for MySQL migrations tableThe configuration key for the migrations table has been updated from
database.migrations
todatabase.migrations.table
. This change appears to be part of a broader update to the configuration structure.
66-66
: LGTM: Updated config key for PostgreSQL migrations tableThe configuration key for the migrations table has been consistently updated for the PostgreSQL driver, matching the change made for MySQL.
85-85
: LGTM: Updated config key for SQLite migrations tableThe configuration key for the migrations table has been consistently updated for the SQLite driver, matching the changes made for MySQL and PostgreSQL.
104-104
: LGTM: Updated config key for SQL Server migrations tableThe configuration key for the migrations table has been consistently updated for the SQL Server driver, matching the changes made for other database drivers.
Line range hint
1-114
: Summary: Consistent and well-implemented changesThe changes in this file are well-implemented and consistent with the PR objectives:
- The package name change from
console
tomigration
improves code organization.- The updates to the migrations table configuration are applied consistently across all supported database drivers (MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite, and SQL Server).
- The new configuration key
database.migrations.table
is used throughout, suggesting a broader update to the configuration structure.These changes should improve the flexibility and maintainability of the migration system. Great job on maintaining consistency across different database drivers!
database/migration/sql_creator_test.go (3)
1-12
: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are well-organized.The package name is appropriate, and the imports are logically organized with standard library packages first, followed by third-party packages. All imports appear to be necessary for the tests.
14-21
: LGTM: SqlCreatorSuite and TestSqlCreatorSuite are well-defined.The
SqlCreatorSuite
struct andTestSqlCreatorSuite
function follow the testify suite conventions and use clear, consistent naming that adheres to Go conventions.
1-149
: Overall, the SqlCreator tests are well-implemented and comprehensive.The test file aligns well with the PR objectives, particularly in supporting multiple database drivers for migrations. The use of the testify suite and table-driven tests provides a solid foundation for testing the SqlCreator functionality. The suggested improvements, if implemented, would further enhance the robustness and coverage of the tests.
database/gorm/test_utils.go (4)
384-384
: LGTM. Consistent with MySQL driver change.The modification from
"database.migrations"
to"database.migrations.table"
in the PostgreSQL mock driver is consistent with the change made in the MySQL mock driver. This ensures uniformity across different database implementations.
448-448
: LGTM. Maintains consistency across all drivers.The change from
"database.migrations"
to"database.migrations.table"
in the SQLite mock driver is consistent with the changes made in both MySQL and PostgreSQL mock drivers. This uniformity across all database implementations is commendable.
511-511
: LGTM. Completes consistent implementation across all drivers.The modification from
"database.migrations"
to"database.migrations.table"
in the SQL Server mock driver completes the consistent implementation across all supported database drivers (MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite, and SQL Server). This uniform approach enhances maintainability and reduces potential confusion.
313-313
: LGTM. Verify consistency across all drivers.The change from
"database.migrations"
to"database.migrations.table"
improves clarity. This modification aligns with the PR objectives for optimizing themake:migration
command.Please ensure this change is consistent across all database drivers. Run the following script to verify:
✅ Verification successful
Consistent Configuration Verified Across Drivers
The change to
"database.migrations.table"
is consistent across all database drivers, ensuring clarity and alignment with the PR objectives.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the migration table configuration is consistent across all drivers rg --type go '"database.migrations.table"' database/Length of output: 906
database/migration/sql_driver.go (2)
21-29
: VerifySqlCreator
method implementationsThe methods
GetStub
,GetPath
, andPopulateStub
are now called on ther.creator
instance ofSqlCreator
. Ensure that these methods are properly implemented inSqlCreator
and that they return the expected values. This is crucial for the correct creation of migration files.Consider reviewing the
SqlCreator
class to confirm that all necessary methods are correctly defined and functioning as intended.
12-14
: Ensure all calls toNewSqlDriver
are updated to the new signatureThe constructor
NewSqlDriver
now acceptsdriver
andcharset
strings instead of aconfig.Config
object. Please verify that all usages ofNewSqlDriver
in the codebase have been updated accordingly to prevent build or runtime errors.Run the following script to locate and review all usages of
NewSqlDriver
:✅ Verification successful
All
NewSqlDriver
calls use the updated signature with two string arguments.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all usages of NewSqlDriver in the codebase. # Expectation: All calls should match the new signature with two string arguments. # Search for function calls to NewSqlDriver rg --type go -A 2 'NewSqlDriver\('Length of output: 872
database/migration/default_driver.go (1)
15-24
: Verify Creator Integration Across CodebaseYou've integrated
DefaultCreator
into theDefaultDriver
. Please ensure that all usages ofDefaultDriver
are compatible with these changes, and that there are no breaking changes elsewhere in the codebase.Run the following script to check for usages of
DefaultDriver
and verify method calls:✅ Verification successful
To ensure full compatibility of
DefaultDriver
integrations across the codebase, I'll analyze all method calls toDefaultDriver
instances.
To ensure all method calls to
DefaultDriver
are compatible with the recent changes, I'll perform a more comprehensive search for its method invocations.
DefaultDriver Integration Verified Successfully
No usages of
DefaultDriver
methods that could be affected by the changes were found across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all usages of DefaultDriver's methods # Test: Search for all calls to DefaultDriver methods. Expect: Methods should match updated signatures. rg --type go 'DefaultDriver' -A 5Length of output: 3768
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract all method calls on DefaultDriver instances # Use ast-grep to find method calls on DefaultDriver ast-grep --lang go --pattern '($_).DefaultDriver.Method($_)' .Length of output: 64
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all method calls on DefaultDriver instances using ripgrep # Search for 'DefaultDriver' method invocations rg --type go 'DefaultDriver\.\w+\(' -A 2Length of output: 42
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
database/migration/driver_test.go (2)
31-62
: Improve error handling in TestCreate method.The TestCreate method is well-structured and thoroughly tests the creation of migration files for different drivers. It correctly uses carbon.SetTestNow for consistent timestamps and includes a cleanup process.
Consider improving the error handling when getting the working directory:
-pwd, _ := os.Getwd() +pwd, err := os.Getwd() +s.Require().NoError(err, "Failed to get working directory")This change ensures that any unexpected errors in getting the working directory are caught and reported, improving the robustness of the test.
1-62
: LGTM: Comprehensive test suite for migration drivers.The implementation of this test suite aligns well with the PR objectives. It provides thorough coverage for both Default and SQL drivers, and the code is clean and well-organized.
To further improve the test suite, consider adding edge cases such as:
- Attempting to create a migration with an invalid name.
- Testing the behavior when the migration directory already exists.
- Verifying the content of the created migration files, not just their existence.
These additional tests would enhance the robustness of the test suite and provide more comprehensive coverage of the migration functionality.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- database/migration/driver_test.go (1 hunks)
- database/service_provider.go (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- database/service_provider.go
🔇 Additional comments (2)
database/migration/driver_test.go (2)
1-13
: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package name and imports are well-structured and relevant to the test suite's functionality. All imported packages are utilized in the code.
15-22
: LGTM: DriverSuite and TestDriverSuite are well-defined.The DriverSuite struct and TestDriverSuite function are correctly implemented using the testify/suite package. The drivers map in the struct allows for flexible testing of multiple driver implementations.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
📑 Description
make:migration
command supports two drivers;DefualtCreator
andSqlCreator
;Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor
Tests
✅ Checks