Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Reintroduce JSpecify annotations. #1709

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cpovirk
Copy link

@cpovirk cpovirk commented Oct 15, 2024

JSpecify 1.0.0 has been released, so I'm hoping that
#1362 is no longer a
concern. (If there are remaining concerns, please do let me know.)

This reverts commit 8138f46 (aka
#1364) with a few
changes:

(JSpecify annotations were originally introduced by
#1010.)

@cpovirk cpovirk requested review from a team as code owners October 15, 2024 19:16
@cpovirk cpovirk requested a review from cindy-peng October 15, 2024 19:16
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added size: s Pull request size is small. api: logging Issues related to the googleapis/java-logging API. labels Oct 15, 2024
JSpecify 1.0.0 has been released, so I'm hoping that
googleapis#1362 is no longer a
concern. (If there are remaining concerns, please do let me know.)

This reverts commit 8138f46 (aka
googleapis#1364) with a few
changes:

- This commit uses JSpecify 1.0.0 instead of 0.2.0.
- As a result, it uses `org.jspecify.annotations` instead of
  `org.jspecify.nullness`.
- It no longer touches `Structs`, since that was deleted in
  googleapis#1501.

(JSpecify annotations were originally introduced by
googleapis#1010.)
@cpovirk cpovirk changed the title Reintroduce JSpecify annotations. fix: Reintroduce JSpecify annotations. Oct 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: logging Issues related to the googleapis/java-logging API. size: s Pull request size is small.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants