Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Storage: Add support for archive storage class #4285

Closed
tritone opened this issue Oct 25, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #4319
Closed

Storage: Add support for archive storage class #4285

tritone opened this issue Oct 25, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #4319
Assignees
Labels
api: storage Issues related to the Cloud Storage API. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.

Comments

@tritone
Copy link

tritone commented Oct 25, 2019

GCS is adding a storage class called "archive" to the existing options for object storage (coldline, standard, etc). Support for this should be added to this client library. This has already been implemented in the C++ client library and there is a PR in python; reference PR here

This should be straightforward as ARCHIVE should just mirror existing valid storage classes. I see the following places where changes are required in order to accomplish this:

@frankyn frankyn added api: storage Issues related to the Cloud Storage API. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design. labels Oct 25, 2019
@frankyn
Copy link
Member

frankyn commented Oct 25, 2019

For the record: this request should come after UBLA is completed/ready.

quartzmo added a commit to quartzmo/google-cloud-ruby that referenced this issue Oct 30, 2019
* Update some storage class testing to use ARCHIVE.

[closes googleapis#4285]
quartzmo added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: storage Issues related to the Cloud Storage API. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants