Recognize new JSpecify package name #869
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
So that its `@Nullable` annotation is treated as a type-use annotation and formatted accordingly. See jspecify/jspecify#260.
This was referenced Dec 15, 2022
cushon
approved these changes
Dec 15, 2022
copybara-service bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2022
So that its `@Nullable` annotation is treated as a type-use annotation and formatted accordingly. See jspecify/jspecify#260. Fixes #869 FUTURE_COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=#869 from PicnicSupermarket:improvement/support-new-jpecify-package-name 7a0dc20 PiperOrigin-RevId: 495699887
1 task
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
So that its
@Nullableannotation is treated as a type-use annotation and formatted accordingly. See jspecify/jspecify#260.