Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add common parsable types #37

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 26, 2024
Merged

feat: add common parsable types #37

merged 5 commits into from
Feb 26, 2024

Conversation

ajatprabha
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@ajatprabha ajatprabha requested a review from sonnes February 15, 2024 07:53
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (72aee65) 98.07% compared to head (18da410) 98.03%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #37      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.07%   98.03%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          39       42       +3     
  Lines         831      866      +35     
==========================================
+ Hits          815      849      +34     
- Misses         16       17       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

xload/type/endpoint.go Show resolved Hide resolved
xload/type/doc.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@ajatprabha ajatprabha force-pushed the common-parsable-types branch from 075dfdb to 18da410 Compare February 16, 2024 08:13
@ajatprabha ajatprabha requested a review from sonnes February 16, 2024 11:07
@ajatprabha ajatprabha merged commit dbe8597 into main Feb 26, 2024
5 checks passed
@ajatprabha ajatprabha deleted the common-parsable-types branch February 26, 2024 11:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants