Add get_depth() to KinematicCollision2D/3D
#64195
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
TokageItLab
changed the title
get_depth() to KinematicCollision3D as same of 2D
TokageItLab
force-pushed
the
add-get-depth-3d
branch
from
859d322 to
7331295
Compare
TokageItLab
changed the title
get_depth() to KinematicCollision3D as same of 2Dget_depth() to KinematicCollision2D/3D
akien-mga
approved these changes
Aug 10, 2022
|
Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes godotengine/godot-proposals#3066
Add
get_depth()to KinematicCollision3D and KinematicCollision2D.get_depth.mp4
physics_test.zip
With this feature, for example, when a player is caught and press between objects, we can calculate damage according to the depth value.
If the penetration is too large, the collision is completely filled and the normals are inverted, making the value of depth not desirable. I think another PR is needed in the future for solving that problem.