-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 204
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add: add product tests (product addon, rma) #2396
Add: add product tests (product addon, rma) #2396
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
tests/pw/tests/e2e/productAddons.spec.ts (1)
100-103
: LGTM with a minor suggestion: Well-structured test for removing a product addon.This test case effectively tests the functionality of removing a product-specific addon. The use of apiUtils for setup is consistent with other parts of the codebase.
However, there's a minor suggestion for improvement:
On line 102, consider adding a type guard instead of using a type assertion:
if (typeof addonName[0] === 'string') { await vendor1.removeAddon(productName, addonName[0]); } else { throw new Error('Unexpected addon name type'); }This approach provides better type safety and runtime checks.
tests/pw/feature-map/feature-map.yml (1)
190-201
: Overall enhancement of vendor capabilitiesThe changes introduced in this feature map significantly enhance vendor capabilities in three key areas:
- EU compliance: Allowing vendors to manage EU compliance data for their products.
- Product addons: Enabling vendors to create, import, export, and manage product addons.
- RMA settings: Providing vendors with options to set various warranty and return policies.
These additions will likely improve the flexibility and control vendors have over their products and stores. However, it's crucial to ensure that these features are properly implemented, tested, and documented to maintain the overall quality and reliability of the Dokan plugin.
Consider the following recommendations:
- Ensure comprehensive unit and integration tests are in place for these new features.
- Update user documentation to explain these new capabilities to vendors.
- Consider adding admin-level controls to enable/disable these features globally if not already present.
- Implement proper validation and error handling for EU compliance data and RMA settings to prevent misuse or incorrect data entry.
Also applies to: 439-442
tests/pw/tests/e2e/productsDetails.spec.ts (1)
473-473
: Implement tests for updating RMA optionsThe TODO comment indicates that tests for updating RMA options are pending.
Would you like assistance in creating these tests to improve coverage of RMA functionalities?
tests/pw/pages/productsPage.ts (1)
1465-1465
: Clarify the method comment for 'exportAddon'To maintain consistency and clarity, consider updating the comment to
// export addon
above theexportAddon
method if it's not already correct.Ensure the comment accurately describes the method:
- // export addon + // export addon
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- tests/pw/feature-map/feature-map.yml (3 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/productsPage.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/productAddons.spec.ts (4 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/productsDetails.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (12)
tests/pw/tests/e2e/productAddons.spec.ts (6)
3-3
: LGTM: New imports and variable declarations are appropriate.The additions of the ProductsPage import and the new variables (vendor1 and productName) are well-placed and necessary for the new product addon tests. The naming convention is consistent with the existing code.
Also applies to: 15-15, 20-20
35-35
: LGTM: Proper setup for new product addon tests.The initialization of vendor1 and the creation of a product in the beforeAll hook are appropriate additions. These changes set up the necessary context for the new product-specific addon tests.
Also applies to: 39-39
86-88
: LGTM: Well-structured test for adding a product addon.This test case is well-implemented, following the existing test structure. It appropriately tests the new functionality of adding a product-specific addon using the vendor1 instance.
90-93
: LGTM: Comprehensive test for importing a product addon.This test case is well-implemented, testing the functionality of importing a product-specific addon. The use of serialization for the addon data is consistent with other parts of the codebase.
95-98
: LGTM: Well-structured test for exporting a product addon.This test case effectively tests the functionality of exporting a product-specific addon. The use of apiUtils for setup and serialization for the export process is consistent with other parts of the codebase.
Line range hint
1-103
: LGTM: Comprehensive and well-structured test suite for product addons.The additions to this test suite provide excellent coverage for product-specific addons, complementing the existing tests for global addons. The new test cases cover all essential operations (add, import, export, and remove) for product-specific addons, maintaining consistency in structure and naming conventions with the existing code.
This comprehensive approach ensures thorough testing of both global and product-specific addon functionalities, which is crucial for maintaining the quality and reliability of the product addon feature.
tests/pw/feature-map/feature-map.yml (4)
197-201
: New RMA options for vendorsThese features allow vendors to add various RMA (Return Merchandise Authorization) options for their products, including no warranty, limited warranty, lifetime warranty, and warranty as an addon.
Let's verify the implementation of these RMA features:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for the implementation of RMA features for vendors # Test: Search for RMA related functions in the codebase rg --type php "function.*rma" -g "!tests/*"
193-196
: New product addon features for vendorsThese features enable vendors to add, import, export, and remove product addons. This enhancement provides vendors with more flexibility in customizing their products.
Let's verify the implementation of these product addon features:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for the implementation of product addon features for vendors # Test: Search for product addon related functions in the codebase rg --type php "function.*product.*addon" -g "!tests/*"
439-442
: New RMA settings for vendorsThese features allow vendors to set various RMA settings, including no warranty, limited warranty, lifetime warranty, and warranty as an addon. This is consistent with the product-level RMA options added earlier.
Let's verify the implementation of these RMA settings:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for the implementation of RMA settings for vendors # Test: Search for RMA settings related functions in the codebase rg --type php "function.*rma.*settings" -g "!tests/*"
190-192
: New EU compliance features for vendorsThese new features allow vendors to add, update, and remove EU compliance data for products. This is a valuable addition that helps ensure products meet EU regulations.
To ensure these features are properly implemented, let's verify the corresponding code:
tests/pw/tests/e2e/productsDetails.spec.ts (2)
441-443
:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure correct serialization and error handling when importing product addons
In the
import product addon
test, you serialize the addon data usingserialize([addon])
.Ensure that the
serialize
function correctly processes the addon data and that any serialization errors are properly handled. Consider adding validation for theaddon
object before serialization.
446-448
:⚠️ Potential issueVerify retrieval of
_product_addons
metadataIn the
export product addon
test, you're accessing the_product_addons
metadata fromresponseBody.meta_data
.Ensure that
responseBody.meta_data
contains the_product_addons
key. Add error handling for cases where the metadata might be missing or malformed to avoid runtime exceptions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
tests/pw/pages/requestForQuotationsPage.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-638
: Consider refactoring for improved maintainabilityWhile not directly related to the current changes, I noticed that the
RequestForQuotationsPage
class is quite large and handles multiple responsibilities (admin, vendor, and customer actions). Consider refactoring this class in the future to improve maintainability:
- Split the class into smaller, more focused classes (e.g.,
AdminQuotePage
,VendorQuotePage
,CustomerQuotePage
).- Extract some of the longer methods into smaller, more manageable functions.
- Use composition to share common functionality between these classes if needed.
This refactoring would improve code organization, make it easier to test, and potentially reduce the likelihood of bugs when modifying quote-related functionality.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- tests/pw/pages/productsPage.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/requestForQuotationsPage.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/productsDetails.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/productsDetails.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (7)
tests/pw/pages/productsPage.ts (7)
1419-1422
: Simplify code by removing unnecessarytoPass
wrapperAs previously noted, the use of
await this.toPass(async () => { ... });
is unnecessary here since the actions inside can be awaited directly. Removingthis.toPass
will simplify the code and enhance readability.
1457-1463
:importAddon
method implementation is correctThe
importAddon
method correctly imports an addon by filling the import input, saving the product, and verifying the presence of the addon. The implementation is concise and functions as intended.
1465-1471
:exportAddon
method implementation is correctThe
exportAddon
method properly exports an addon and verifies that the export input contains the correct addon identifier. The code is clear and operates correctly.
1473-1480
:removeAddon
method implementation is correctThe
removeAddon
method effectively removes an addon from a product, confirms its deletion, and ensures it is no longer visible after saving. The method is well-implemented.
1483-1527
: Consider refactoring to reduce code duplication inaddProductRmaOptions
As previously suggested, the
addProductRmaOptions
method contains repeated code blocks for handling differentrma.type
values and their corresponding verifications. Refactoring these blocks into helper functions can improve maintainability by reducing duplication.
1523-1525
: Re-evaluaterefundReasonIsVisible
after savingAs previously noted, after saving the product with
await this.saveProduct();
, the visibility ofproductsVendor.rma.refundReasonsFirst
may change. Re-checkingrefundReasonIsVisible
after saving ensures accurate verification of the refund reasons.
1530-1535
:removeProductRmaOptions
method implementation is correctThe
removeProductRmaOptions
method correctly disables RMA settings for a product and confirms that the settings are no longer enabled after saving. The implementation is appropriate and works as expected.
All Submissions:
Changes proposed in this Pull Request:
Related Pull Request(s)
Closes
How to test the changes in this Pull Request:
Changelog entry
Title
Detailed Description of the pull request. What was previous behaviour
and what will be changed in this PR.
Before Changes
Describe the issue before changes with screenshots(s).
After Changes
Describe the issue after changes with screenshot(s).
Feature Video (optional)
Link of detailed video if this PR is for a feature.
PR Self Review Checklist:
FOR PR REVIEWER ONLY:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests