Add: add product form tests( shipping, tax, linked products) #2393
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce significant enhancements to the vendor management features within the application. Key updates include the ability for vendors to manage product shipping, tax details, and linked products on the "Products" page. Additional features for vendor subscriptions and store support are also included. Furthermore, modifications to the login process and various test cases have been implemented to ensure comprehensive testing of these new functionalities. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
tests/pw/pages/loginPage.ts (1)
49-54: Summary of changes tologinBackendmethodThe modifications to the
loginBackendmethod appear to be positive improvements:
- Enhanced page loading reliability with
gotoUntilNetworkidle.- Updated redirection expectations after login.
- Increased flexibility by removing the hardcoded status code.
These changes should lead to more robust and maintainable tests. However, please ensure that:
- The new redirection behavior (to admin dashboard) is consistent with the actual application behavior.
- Other test files are updated if they rely on the previous login behavior.
- The removal of the hardcoded status code doesn't introduce any regressions in error handling.
Consider adding a comment explaining the expected login flow and why the redirection URL was changed. This will help future maintainers understand the reasoning behind these modifications.
tests/pw/tests/e2e/vendorSettings.spec.ts (2)
123-123: Approved: Minor improvement in test description readability.The removal of the colon from the test description improves readability. This change is good and doesn't affect the test's functionality.
For consistency, consider applying this change to other similar test descriptions in the file. For example:
test('vendor can set rma settings (warranty included limited)', { tag: ['@pro', '@vendor'] }, async () => {could be changed to:
test('vendor can set rma settings (warranty included limited)', { tag: ['@pro', '@vendor'] }, async () => {
Skipped tests lack explanations.
The tests
'vendor can set store banner settings'and'vendor can set store profile picture settings'are currently skipped without any accompanying comments explaining the reason. It's recommended to add comments clarifying whether these tests are under development, temporarily disabled due to known issues, or deprecated. This will improve code maintainability and clarity for future contributors.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-138: Overall test suite structure is comprehensive, but some tests are skipped.The test suite covers a wide range of vendor settings, which is excellent for ensuring comprehensive coverage. The use of tags (@lite, @Pro, @Vendor) allows for flexible test execution.
However, there are two skipped tests:
- 'vendor can set store banner settings'
- 'vendor can set store profile picture settings'
Could you please clarify why these tests are skipped? Are they under development or temporarily disabled due to known issues? Consider adding a comment explaining the reason for skipping these tests, or create issues to track their implementation if they're not yet developed.
To verify the status of these skipped tests, you can run the following command:
This will help us understand if there are any comments or surrounding code that explain why these tests are skipped.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for skipped tests and their surrounding context rg --type typescript -C 5 "test\.skip\(" tests/pw/tests/e2e/vendorSettings.spec.tsLength of output: 119
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for skipped tests and their surrounding context without specifying type rg "test\.skip\(" -C 5 tests/pw/tests/e2e/vendorSettings.spec.tsLength of output: 704
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for comments before skipped tests rg "test\.skip\(" -B 3 tests/pw/tests/e2e/vendorSettings.spec.ts | rg "//|/\*"Length of output: 102
tests/pw/tests/e2e/productsDetails.spec.ts (4)
322-332: LGTM! Shipping tests look good.The new tests for product shipping (add, update, remove) are well-structured and follow the existing patterns. They cover the essential scenarios for managing product shipping details.
Suggestion for improvement:
Consider adding a test case for invalid shipping data to ensure proper error handling.
334-340: LGTM! Tax tests are well-implemented.The new tests for product tax (with and without tax class) are properly structured and cover the main scenarios for adding product tax.
Suggestion for improvement:
Consider adding a test case for updating and removing product tax to ensure complete coverage of tax-related operations.
344-358: LGTM! Linked products tests are comprehensive.The new tests for linked products (up-sells and cross-sells) cover both adding and removing scenarios, which is great for ensuring proper functionality.
Suggestion for improvement:
Consider adding a test case for updating linked products to ensure that existing links can be modified correctly.
319-358: Great job on expanding the test coverage!The new tests for shipping, tax, and linked products align well with the PR objectives of introducing tests for the product form, specifically targeting additional options within the catalog. These additions significantly enhance the test coverage for product management features.
The tests are well-structured, properly tagged, and follow the established patterns in the existing test suite. They cover essential scenarios for each feature, including adding, updating, and removing (where applicable) the respective product details.
To further improve the test suite:
- Consider adding error handling scenarios for each new feature.
- Ensure that all edge cases are covered, such as updating existing data or handling invalid inputs.
- If not already present elsewhere in the test suite, consider adding integration tests that combine these new features with other product management operations.
Overall, these additions greatly contribute to the robustness of the test suite and help ensure the reliability of the product management features.
tests/pw/feature-map/feature-map.yml (3)
171-179: New vendor features for product management look good!The additions to the "Products" page features for vendors are well-structured and consistent with the existing format. These new capabilities enhance the vendor's ability to manage product details more comprehensively. Here's a breakdown of the new features:
- Product shipping management (add, update, remove)
- Product tax management (add, including tax class)
- Linked products management (add and remove up-sells and cross-sells)
These features align well with common e-commerce functionalities and should provide vendors with more control over their product listings.
However, to ensure completeness, consider the following suggestions:
- Add a feature for updating product tax, similar to the shipping features.
- Consider adding features for managing product attributes and variations, if not already present elsewhere in the file.
Line range hint
1-1037: Overall structure is good, but some improvements could enhance consistency and clarity.The feature map is comprehensive and well-organized. However, there are a few areas where consistency and clarity could be improved:
Standardize feature descriptions: Some features are very specific (e.g., "admin can add standard tax rate [lite]"), while others are more general (e.g., "no test is written for elementor module (out of scope)"). Consider adopting a consistent level of detail across all features.
Address duplicate entries: There are comments indicating duplicate entries (e.g., "admin can set Dokan geolocation settings [duplicate]"). Consider removing or consolidating these to avoid confusion.
Resolve TODO items: Some features are marked as "false" without explanation (e.g., "admin can import dummy data: false"). Consider adding comments to explain why these features are set to false or if they are planned for future implementation.
Consistent use of tags: The "[lite]" tag is used inconsistently. Consider reviewing its usage and ensuring it's applied uniformly where appropriate.
Group related features: Some closely related features are spread across different sections. Consider grouping them together for better organization (e.g., all EU compliance features in one section).
Would you like assistance in restructuring any specific sections of the file to improve consistency?
Line range hint
1-1037: Overall, the changes and feature map are well-structured with room for minor improvements.The additions to the vendor product management features in the "Products" page section are valuable enhancements that will provide vendors with more control over their listings. The new capabilities for managing product shipping, taxes, and linked products are well-aligned with e-commerce best practices.
The feature map as a whole is comprehensive and provides a clear overview of the Dokan system's capabilities across different user roles and pages. However, there are opportunities to improve consistency in feature descriptions, resolve duplicate entries, and group related features more effectively.
Key points to consider:
- Implement the suggested consistency improvements throughout the file.
- Ensure proper security measures are in place when implementing the new features.
- Consider adding any missing features related to product attribute and variation management.
- Regularly review and update the feature map to keep it in sync with the actual implementation.
To maintain the quality and usefulness of this feature map:
- Consider implementing a automated process to keep this feature map in sync with the actual codebase implementation.
- Develop clear guidelines for adding new features to the map, ensuring consistency in description detail and tag usage.
- Periodically review the entire feature map to identify areas for consolidation or expansion based on system evolution.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- tests/pw/feature-map/feature-map.yml (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/loginPage.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/productsPage.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/productsDetails.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/vendorSettings.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
tests/pw/pages/loginPage.ts (3)
49-49: Improved page navigation handlingThe change from
goIfNotThere(url)togotoUntilNetworkidle(url)is a good improvement. This ensures that the page is fully loaded and the network is idle before proceeding with the login process, which can help prevent race conditions and improve test reliability.
54-54: Removed hardcoded status codeThe hardcoded status code
302has been removed from theclickAndWaitForResponseAndLoadStatecall. This change makes the method more flexible, as it can now handle various status codes that might be returned in different scenarios.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any regressions, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other occurrences of hardcoded status codes in test files # Test: Search for hardcoded status codes in test files rg --type typescript '\d{3}' ./testsThis script will help us identify if there are any other instances of hardcoded status codes in the test files that might need similar updates for consistency.
54-54: Updated redirection URL after loginThe URL in
clickAndWaitForResponseAndLoadStatehas been changed fromdata.subUrls.backend.logintodata.subUrls.backend.adminDashboard. This suggests that after a successful login, the user is now expected to be redirected to the admin dashboard instead of remaining on the login page.To ensure this change is consistent with the application's behavior, please run the following script:
This script will help us verify if the login redirection logic in the application code matches this test expectation.
tests/pw/feature-map/feature-map.yml (1)
171-179: Consider security implications for new product management features.While the new features for vendor product management are valuable additions, it's crucial to ensure proper security measures are in place during implementation:
Access Control: Verify that only authorized vendors can modify their own products' shipping, tax, and linked product details.
Input Validation: Implement thorough input validation for all new fields, especially for tax rates and shipping details, to prevent potential injection attacks or data inconsistencies.
Audit Logging: Consider implementing audit logs for these operations to track changes and help with troubleshooting or dispute resolution.
Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting on these operations to prevent potential abuse or DOS attacks.
Data Integrity: Ensure that adding or removing linked products (up-sells and cross-sells) maintains data integrity and doesn't create circular references.
To help verify these security considerations, you could run the following script:
This script will help identify if these security measures are being implemented in the codebase.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
tests/pw/pages/productsPage.ts (1)
1200-1200: Correct the Comment AboveremoveProductShippingMethodThe comment at line 1200 incorrectly states "// add product shipping" before the
removeProductShippingmethod. Please update it to "// remove product shipping" for accuracy and clarity.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/pw/pages/productsPage.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
tests/pw/pages/productsPage.ts (4)
1184-1199: Well-ImplementedaddProductShippingMethodThe
addProductShippingmethod effectively adds shipping details to a product. The implementation is clear, follows best practices, and the code is concise.
1201-1206:removeProductShippingMethod Implementation is CorrectThe
removeProductShippingmethod properly removes the shipping requirement from the product. The code is straightforward and functions as expected.
1219-1256:addProductLinkedProductsMethod Functions CorrectlyThe
addProductLinkedProductsmethod correctly adds linked products based on thechoiceparameter. The use of descriptive variable names likelinkedProductenhances readability.
1259-1294:removeProductLinkedProductsMethod Works as IntendedThe
removeProductLinkedProductsmethod effectively removes linked products according to thechoiceparameter. The code is clean and maintains consistency with the addition method.
shashwatahalder01
changed the title
All Submissions:
Changes proposed in this Pull Request:
Related Pull Request(s)
Closes
How to test the changes in this Pull Request:
Changelog entry
Title
Detailed Description of the pull request. What was previous behaviour
and what will be changed in this PR.
Before Changes
Describe the issue before changes with screenshots(s).
After Changes
Describe the issue after changes with screenshot(s).
Feature Video (optional)
Link of detailed video if this PR is for a feature.
PR Self Review Checklist:
FOR PR REVIEWER ONLY:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests