Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge 9 -> 11 #615

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 1, 2021
Merged

Merge 9 -> 11 #615

merged 4 commits into from
Jul 1, 2021

Conversation

scpeters
Copy link
Member

@scpeters scpeters commented Jul 1, 2021

➡️ Forward port

Port sdf9 to sdf11. Normally I would merge from sdf10 to sdf11 after #614, but I wasn't sure if the parameter passing prototype on sdf10 is ready to be merged forward to edifice. Meanwhile, there are a lot of conflicts between #601 and #602 that completely disappear after taking several minutes to resolve them all, so I wanted to simplify our lives by getting that conflict resolution out of the way.

Branch comparison: sdf11...sdf9

Note to maintainers: Remember to Merge with commit (not squash-merge or rebase)

Marco A. Gutiérrez and others added 3 commits June 17, 2021 13:37
gazebosim#575)

Now PrintValues() and ToString() will not output the elements that were added by default during parsing. There's also the option to call them with a boolean flag that will allow the caller to decide weather they want defaults in the output or not.

Signed-off-by: Marco A. Gutierrez <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: Addisu Z. Taddese <[email protected]>
This moves the recently added data member `explicitlySetInFile` to the
end of the `ElementPrivate` class

Signed-off-by: Addisu Z. Taddese <[email protected]>
The graph data is private, so expose methods for
checking that the graphs are valid.

* Add tests showing graph errors

Load an sdf::World or sdf::Model instead of an sdf::Root to
see the graph errors.

Signed-off-by: Steve Peters <[email protected]>
@scpeters scpeters requested review from azeey and chapulina July 1, 2021 01:11
@github-actions github-actions bot added the 🏢 edifice Ignition Edifice label Jul 1, 2021
@chapulina
Copy link
Contributor

There's a new test failure.

I haven't done one of these skipped forward ports, it will be interesting to see what the subsequent ones look like.

@scpeters
Copy link
Member Author

scpeters commented Jul 1, 2021

There's a new test failure.

I fixed the test in a force push

I haven't done one of these skipped forward ports, it will be interesting to see what the subsequent ones look like.

I locally did a test merge of this branch with merge_9_10 and there were fewer conflicts

@scpeters scpeters merged commit 7ecd88b into gazebosim:sdf11 Jul 1, 2021
@scpeters scpeters deleted the merge_9_11 branch July 1, 2021 17:42
@scpeters scpeters mentioned this pull request Jul 1, 2021
7 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🏢 edifice Ignition Edifice
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants