Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Website updates from hackathon #638

Merged
merged 54 commits into from
Feb 27, 2025

Conversation

dannon
Copy link
Member

@dannon dannon commented Dec 16, 2024

xref #629.

image

FOR CONTRIBUTOR:

  • I have read the Adding workflows guidelines
  • License permits unrestricted use (educational + commercial)
  • Please also take note of the reviewer guidelines below to facilitate a smooth review process.

FOR REVIEWERS:

  • .dockstore.yml: file is present and aligned with creator metadata in workflow. ORCID identifiers are strongly encouraged in creator metadata. The .dockstore.yml file is required to run tests
  • Workflow is sufficiently generic to be used with lab data and does not hardcode sample names, reference data and can be run without reading an accompanying tutorial.
  • In workflow: annotation field contains short description of what the workflow does. Should start with This workflow does/runs/performs … xyz … to generate/analyze/etc …
  • In workflow: workflow inputs and outputs have human readable names (spaces are fine, no underscore, dash only where spelling dictates it), no abbreviation unless it is generally understood. Altering input or output labels requires adjusting these labels in the the workflow-tests.yml file as well
  • In workflow: name field should be human readable (spaces are fine, no underscore, dash only where spelling dictates it), no abbreviation unless generally understood
  • Workflow folder: prefer dash (-) over underscore (_), prefer all lowercase. Folder becomes repository in iwc-workflows organization and is included in TRS id
  • Readme explains what workflow does, what are valid inputs and what outputs users can expect. If a tutorial or other resources exist they can be linked. If a similar workflow exists in IWC readme should explain differences with existing workflow and when one might prefer one workflow over another
  • Changelog contains appropriate entries
  • Large files (> 100 KB) are uploaded to zenodo and location urls are used in test file

@dannon dannon changed the title Workflow list updates website workflow list updates from hackathon Dec 16, 2024
@dannon dannon added website enhancement New feature or request labels Dec 16, 2024
@dannon dannon marked this pull request as draft December 16, 2024 14:25
@dannon dannon changed the title website workflow list updates from hackathon Website updates from hackathon Dec 19, 2024
@dannon dannon force-pushed the workflow-list-updates branch from 310ed0c to e70ae68 Compare December 19, 2024 13:45
@dannon dannon force-pushed the workflow-list-updates branch from abb6505 to f807009 Compare February 18, 2025 03:27
dannon and others added 23 commits February 26, 2025 10:19
… care about adding the category to the manifest.
Since we'll have a hero below this, maybe no need for a large masthead?
needs a bit of work to ensure scrolling isn't annoying
This commit improves the layout and design of the popular workflows section on the main page by:
- Making workflow cards more compact
- Adding responsive grid layout
- Limiting description and badge display
- Adding a "Browse all workflows" button
- Improving hover and shadow effects
@dannon dannon force-pushed the workflow-list-updates branch from a2b31d7 to 637f53b Compare February 27, 2025 04:01
@dannon dannon marked this pull request as ready for review February 27, 2025 04:01
Copy link
Member

@mvdbeek mvdbeek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks so much @dannon!

@mvdbeek mvdbeek merged commit 9c2c36b into galaxyproject:main Feb 27, 2025
9 of 10 checks passed
@mvdbeek
Copy link
Member

mvdbeek commented Feb 27, 2025

Attention: deployment skipped!

https://github.com/galaxyproject/iwc/actions/runs/13568589218

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request website
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants