Preserve block position

[gagoar]

Description

This PR adds a new option to preserve the position of the generated block if the user so desires. this is helpful when there's certain strict order the developer wants to keep. Normally because there are manual entries.

This closes #343

Missing:

• CLI option
• Documentation
• Logic Refactor (because it looks ugly what I did)

Extra:

So I was playing with ChatGPT, and I decided to ask for rewrites on my code the changes are not that bad. So I left them in

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 4464484702

• 33 of 33 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 4 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage remained the same at 100.0%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 4463753938:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	262
Relevant Lines:	262

---

💛 - Coveralls

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (4bc8d89) 100.00% compared to head (99e19a0) 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #347   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           10        11    +1     
  Lines          262       277   +15     
  Branches        57        60    +3     
=========================================
+ Hits           262       277   +15     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/utils/constants.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/commands/generate.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/utils/codeowners.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/utils/getCustomConfiguration.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/utils/templates.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[gustavkj]

Looks good 👍 But I think it might be hard to keep only parts of a repos ownership with this tool, but if this help then that's a plus 🙂

[gagoar]

Looks good 👍 But I think it might be hard to keep only parts of a repos ownership with this tool, but if this help then that's a plus 🙂

Yea, I think it is logical to want to keep some pieces at the top. and some others govern by the tool. It is a balancing act as well.

I will prefer ppl just using codeowners-generator and forget about this file altogether. I do recognize an in-between state tho.