Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Omas plot w new efit mapping #258

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Nov 25, 2024
Merged

Conversation

AreWeDreaming
Copy link
Collaborator

Dependent on #256. This PR uses the new fields from #255 for the equilibrium summary plot. Regression test for omas_plot passes locally.

@AreWeDreaming AreWeDreaming requested a review from orso82 July 31, 2023 18:17
Copy link

Stale pull request message

@AreWeDreaming
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This really should be merged. It has some pretty sizeable changes. Notably #255 needs to be merged first.

@AreWeDreaming
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Oh #255 already was merged so that is good.

Copy link

Stale pull request message

Copy link

Stale pull request message

@AreWeDreaming
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This allows picking a source for core_profiles e.g. ZIPFIT or OMFIT_PROFS

Copy link

This PR has not seen any activity in the past 60 days. It is now marked as stale and will be closed in 7 days if no further activity is registered.

Copy link
Collaborator

@torrinba torrinba left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This all looks fine to me. And passes the OMAS and OMFIT regression tests.

Once you fix the conflicts I think we should merge @AreWeDreaming

@AreWeDreaming AreWeDreaming merged commit cc925c3 into master Nov 25, 2024
6 checks passed
@AreWeDreaming AreWeDreaming deleted the omas_plot_w_new_EFIT_mapping branch November 25, 2024 16:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants