Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[feature_request] Publish the 'joint_states_desired' topic in the gazebo simulation #164

Closed
rickstaa opened this issue Aug 30, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

[feature_request] Publish the 'joint_states_desired' topic in the gazebo simulation #164

rickstaa opened this issue Aug 30, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@rickstaa
Copy link
Contributor

rickstaa commented Aug 30, 2021 •
edited
Loading

It would be great if you could also publish the '/'. I think adding '/joint_states_desired' topic both in simulation and the real robot would improve translating between the two. I created pull request #145 for this.

Having #145 merged would allow for cleaner code while providing the gazebo simulation in the panda_moveit_config package. As a result, it is currently blocking the release of the ROS Noetic version of the panda_moveit_config package.
@rickstaa rickstaa changed the title [feature_request] Please add the [feature_request] Publish the 'joint_states_desired' topic in the gazebo simulation Aug 30, 2021
@rickstaa rickstaa mentioned this issue Aug 30, 2021
Closed
@gollth
Copy link
Contributor

gollth commented Sep 27, 2021

I will close this as well, since we merged #145. Thanks again for your contribution

@gollth gollth closed this as completed Sep 27, 2021
falfab added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 14, 2021
@falfab
Merge pull request #164 in SWDEV/franka_ros from bugfix/SRR-1221-lint…
8efef62 
…ing-githubworkflow to develop

* commit '36fc74404943690e8e593c56be20a57731d02f67':
  Fix: Check python formatting in github workflow and added in Jenkinsfile
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@rickstaa @gollth