-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Move cg further aft #7691
Merged
Merged
fix: Move cg further aft #7691
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
13 tasks
tracernz
approved these changes
Jan 7, 2023
Quality Assurance Tester Report Discord : mico#3145 Testing Process: Negatives: Testing Results: Conclusions: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The current CG position for the A32NX is too far forward. At the maximum structural takeoff weight of 79T, the A320 must have a CG of at least 27% MAC to be within the takeoff CG envelope. This cannot be done with the A32NX.
Summary of Changes
Screenshots (if necessary)
BEFORE:
Payload stations (pink boxes- actual loading stations are in the middle of each box):
Cargo stations (pink boxes - kind of hard to see):
AFTER:
New payload stations shown here: (They are shown as pink boxes in MSFS. Since they are difficult to see in this shot, I have drawn some pink lines at the edge of each payload station.)
New cargo stations shown here. (In this case, the pink boxes are clear enough by themselves.)
References
Additional context
Discord username (if different from GitHub): donbikes#4084
Testing instructions
Confirm that the airplane can be loaded to 79T and be within the takeoff CG envelope shown above. Confirm that reasonable loading distributions do not result in unreasonable CG values.How to download the PR for QA
Every new commit to this PR will cause a new A32NX artifact to be created, built, and uploaded.