Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[webview_flutter_web] Migrate to package:web. #6792
[webview_flutter_web] Migrate to package:web. #6792
Changes from 19 commits
61b792d
5775d2e
efbad89
d622bb5
2e11ac2
ab527d9
39b12b6
5e378c4
516c357
d03c9fc
bd2d8a7
4d4f6d7
b77d3fb
a890b22
4ee87cc
87c7243
e01a712
befc2d8
ba4a2e5
da0b903
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we have support for the JS Map type yet (in JS interop that is), so perhaps we should add a TODO for that? Unless we have a constructor for
web.HeadersInit
that takes aMap<String, String>
?In my opinion we can eventually get rid of the
jsify()
in the long run?Not sure how @ditman feels about doing that, though?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(@navaronbracke I wrote the
.jsify()
bits :P)Currently
HeadersInit
is just an alias ofJSObject
.The
init
in JS itself is a vague object-like thing that doesn't have a very specific way of being constructed:Headers
init
parameter:I'm using the simplest/most legible way I've found so far of creating an object literal of a JS-interop type (a
Map<String, Object?>.jsify()! as JsInteropType
). I agree that a more semantic constructor inpackage:web
could be better, but this way I can use all the power of Dart Maps until the very last moment. /cc @srujzs for The Ultimate Expert Opinion™!There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(Maybe something with
_createObjectLiteral
? source)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could add a better constructor here if that's easier to read, but it's not going to do anything more complicated than just
jsify
:) e.g.JSObject.fromMap(Map m) => m.jsify() as JSObject;
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@srujzs yeah, I'd like to have a
jsify
in non-nullable-object so I don't have toMap.jsify()!
and maybe aT jsifyAs<T>()
that does the casting for me, so I could replace:by
(Not that it saves too much typing, though)