-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[webview_flutter_web] Migrate to package:web. #6792
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
20 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
61b792d
Fix Web
ThomasAunvik 5775d2e
Attempt to fix tests
ThomasAunvik efbad89
Do not create iframe mock
ThomasAunvik d622bb5
Refactoring
ThomasAunvik 2e11ac2
Webview Flutter Web Changelog
ThomasAunvik ab527d9
Sort directives
ThomasAunvik 39b12b6
Return Response instead, closing client on finally
ThomasAunvik 5e378c4
Fix mock response headers to return valid object
ThomasAunvik 516c357
Set SDK requirement to ^3.3.0
ThomasAunvik d03c9fc
Mock IFrame
ThomasAunvik bd2d8a7
Mock object of the fake iframe class
ThomasAunvik 4d4f6d7
Add License to missing file
ThomasAunvik b77d3fb
Pubspec Flutter Version, Getters and Setters for in par with implemen…
ThomasAunvik a890b22
Implement HttpRequestFactory with fetch. Remove package:http dep.
ditman 4ee87cc
Use the web.Response API.
ditman 87c7243
Fake web.Response and IFrames with the new JS-interop style (without …
ditman e01a712
Regenerate/clean mocks.
ditman befc2d8
Remove webview_flutter_web from Wasm exclusion list.
ditman ba4a2e5
Roll a full minor version. Update CHANGELOG.
ditman da0b903
Apply suggestions from code review
ditman File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we have support for the JS Map type yet (in JS interop that is), so perhaps we should add a TODO for that? Unless we have a constructor for
web.HeadersInit
that takes aMap<String, String>
?In my opinion we can eventually get rid of the
jsify()
in the long run?Not sure how @ditman feels about doing that, though?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(@navaronbracke I wrote the
.jsify()
bits :P)Currently
HeadersInit
is just an alias ofJSObject
.The
init
in JS itself is a vague object-like thing that doesn't have a very specific way of being constructed:Headers
init
parameter:I'm using the simplest/most legible way I've found so far of creating an object literal of a JS-interop type (a
Map<String, Object?>.jsify()! as JsInteropType
). I agree that a more semantic constructor inpackage:web
could be better, but this way I can use all the power of Dart Maps until the very last moment. /cc @srujzs for The Ultimate Expert Opinion™!There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(Maybe something with
_createObjectLiteral
? source)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could add a better constructor here if that's easier to read, but it's not going to do anything more complicated than just
jsify
:) e.g.JSObject.fromMap(Map m) => m.jsify() as JSObject;
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@srujzs yeah, I'd like to have a
jsify
in non-nullable-object so I don't have toMap.jsify()!
and maybe aT jsifyAs<T>()
that does the casting for me, so I could replace:by
(Not that it saves too much typing, though)