bugfix/databricks-sql-path-adjustment #123
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Overview
This PR will address the following Issue/Feature: Issue #120
This PR will result in the following new package version:
v1.7.2
This will be non breaking as it will only adjust the regex search in the Datarbricks SQL Warehouse to remove a leading backslash. There will be no breaking changes resulting from this release.
Please provide the finalized CHANGELOG entry which details the relevant changes included in this PR:
PR Checklist
Basic Validation
Please acknowledge that you have successfully performed the following commands locally:
Before marking this PR as "ready for review" the following have been applied:
Detailed Validation
Please share any and all of your validation steps:
In order to test this I did the following:
v1.7.1
release is not working as expected. It is due to code on the Quickstart side which removes the leading/
from thetarget.http_path
. Please see internal messages for link to code. Therefore, removing the leading/
from the regex search in theis_databricks_sql_warehouse()
macro should do the trick with working on both dbt core and Quickstart.dbt run -t databricks-sql
(after a full refresh to simulate if there was any incremental strategy) there was no incremental logic included in the model. Further, no incremental models were captured in the end complete statement.If you had to summarize this PR in an emoji, which would it be?