Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

status of accumulate, strain & list-ops #555

Closed
robphoenix opened this issue Mar 2, 2017 · 2 comments · Fixed by #574
Closed

status of accumulate, strain & list-ops #555

robphoenix opened this issue Mar 2, 2017 · 2 comments · Fixed by #574

Comments

@robphoenix
Copy link
Contributor

accumulate & strain are to be deprecated across the exercism curriculum, in favour of the list-ops exercise:

exercism/java#297
exercism/problem-specifications#553 (comment)
exercism/problem-specifications#588 (comment)

Currently in this track accumulate is deprecated, strain is active and list-ops has not been implemented.

There has been some recent discussion about this here
The main points being:

  • Although list operations such as map, filter and reduce are actively discouraged in Go, it is still considered a beneficial learning exercise to implement them, though for a specific type rather than generically.
  • The suggestion that this track un-deprecate accumulate, until list-ops is added. If list-ops will be added within the next few days, then there's no point in adding the churn, but if it will be a while in coming, why not show accumulate?

I'd like to implement the list-ops exercise but realistically am not going to within the next few days. Please don't take this as my calling dibs on the exercise, I am sure others would probably implement it better than me and from my point of view it would be an opportunity for learning rather than a doubling of efforts.

So, until list-ops is implemented do we:

  1. deprecate strain and un-deprecate accumulate
  2. leave strain and un-deprecate accumulate
  3. leave both as is until list-ops is implemented and then deprecate strain
@petertseng
Copy link
Member

In case I haven't made it clear by my #18 (comment), I suggest to un-deprecate accumulate. We can deprecate them when list-ops comes.

@robphoenix
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ok, well, unless there's any objections, let's do that. @ferhatelmas @tleen

robphoenix added a commit to robphoenix/exercism-go that referenced this issue Mar 9, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants