exercises/practice/anagram: add an append with instructions about the order of the return values

[IsaacG]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

Thank you for contributing to exercism/elixir 💜 🎉. This is an automated PR comment 🤖 for the maintainers of this repository that helps with the PR review process. You can safely ignore it and wait for a maintainer to review your changes.

Based on the files changed in this PR, it would be good to pay attention to the following details when reviewing the PR:

• General steps

  • 🏆 Does this PR need to receive a label with a reputation modifier (x:size/{tiny,small,medium,large,massive})? (A medium reputation amount is awarded by default, see docs)

• Any exercise changed

  • 👤 Does the author of the PR need to be added as an author or contributor in <exercise>/.meta/config.json (see docs)?
  • 🔬 Do the analyzer and the analyzer comments exist for this exercise? Do they need to be changed?
  • 📜 Does the design file (<exercise>/.meta/design.md) need to be updated to document new implementation decisions?

• Practice exercise changed

  • 🌲 Do prerequisites, practices, and difficulty in config.json need to be updated?
  • 🧑‍🏫 Are the changes in accordance with the community-wide problem specifiations?

---

Automated comment created by PR Commenter 🤖.

[neenjaw]

@IsaacG, Why this approach rather than change the test to not be dependent on the order?

[neenjaw]

I went digging to find the forum thread which prompted this PR, would have been nice to have more description with the motivation here. I don't think the order should matter, I will submit a candidate PR with a fixed test

[IsaacG]

Clarify what this track expects. Context: https://forum.exercism.org/t/14816/

[IsaacG]

I went digging to find the forum thread which prompted this PR, would have been nice to have more description with the motivation here. I don't think the order should matter, I will submit a candidate PR with a fixed test

You're absolutely correct. My apologies for the inconvenience. Would you like me to update this PR to reflect that the tests will not care about the order? Or this PR can be closed, leaving the instructions ambiguous and leaving it to the tests to impose (or not) any requirements.

[neenjaw]

closed in favor of PR