Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
internal/ethapi: fix defaults for blob fields #29037
internal/ethapi: fix defaults for blob fields #29037
Changes from 2 commits
3cc8afb
1474a8f
f97408f
ce80a95
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This part I don't agree with. Geth should always be able to create blob transactions, it shouldn't depend on the chain head for that. If there is a restriction about sending them, it will be enforced by the txpool, but AFAIK even the pool accepts them before Cancun.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure. I liked to have it because setDefaults doubles as a pre-validation for the EVM sometimes (createAccessList). Removed that check.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess this clause is also part of what @fjl would oppose (and I think I agree)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm so it's a good question what to do in this case. Should we set gasPrice or no?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this should be removed. But just so I understand, this would happen if the user passes in sidecar, but geth is not in cancun mode?
IF so, I think we should let the user proceed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed. Exactly if user sends in blobs to compute the proofs and commitments, however chain is still behind cancun.