Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

light: light chain, tx pool and VM env #2120

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

zsfelfoldi
Copy link
Contributor

This PR implements light.LightChain, light.TxPool and light.VMEnv. Together with the previously implemented LightState, these functions provide the light client version of the basic core functionality (with shared code where possible). They are independent of the current LES protocol and can be used with any ODR mechanism that implements OdrBackend and can handle the four basic requests required by the light core.
This PR is based on top of #2081

@robotally
Copy link

Vote Count Reviewers
👍 0
👎 0

Updated: Wed Jan 13 19:29:41 UTC 2016

@zsfelfoldi zsfelfoldi force-pushed the light-utils branch 2 times, most recently from c999691 to 903778f Compare January 13, 2016 19:24
@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 50.30%

Merging #2120 into develop will increase coverage by +0.24% as of b389539

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

@zsfelfoldi zsfelfoldi force-pushed the light-utils branch 2 times, most recently from 9ab2aa3 to 625d44a Compare January 14, 2016 04:08
@zsfelfoldi zsfelfoldi changed the title light: light chain and VM env light: light chain, tx pool and VM env Feb 1, 2016
@karalabe karalabe added this to the 1.5.0 milestone Feb 19, 2016
@zsfelfoldi zsfelfoldi force-pushed the light-utils branch 2 times, most recently from dad0f52 to 34e3649 Compare February 25, 2016 03:36
@fjl
Copy link
Contributor

fjl commented Oct 28, 2016

Superseded by #3145

@fjl fjl closed this Oct 28, 2016
maoueh pushed a commit to streamingfast/go-ethereum that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants