Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

migrate to use max-learners flag #19298

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 29, 2025
Merged

Conversation

gangli113
Copy link
Contributor

Migrate flag experimental-max-learners described in: #19141

The experimental flags are marked as deprecated and will be decommissioned in v3.7

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

Hi @gangli113. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a etcd-io member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 86.66667% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.87%. Comparing base (35d20d1) to head (27d9978).
Report is 12 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
server/etcdserver/bootstrap.go 71.42% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
server/config/config.go 80.23% <ø> (ø)
server/embed/config.go 79.65% <100.00%> (+0.06%) ⬆️
server/embed/etcd.go 76.49% <100.00%> (ø)
server/etcdmain/config.go 73.17% <100.00%> (+0.33%) ⬆️
server/etcdserver/bootstrap.go 63.59% <71.42%> (ø)

... and 18 files with indirect coverage changes

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #19298      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.84%   68.87%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         420      420              
  Lines       35689    35693       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits        24570    24584      +14     
+ Misses       9693     9691       -2     
+ Partials     1426     1418       -8     

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 35d20d1...27d9978. Read the comment docs.

@gangli113
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @siyuanfoundation @serathius @ahrtr

@ahrtr
Copy link
Member

ahrtr commented Jan 29, 2025

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

@gangli113: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-etcd-release-tests 27d9978 link false /test pull-etcd-release-tests

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@ahrtr
Copy link
Member

ahrtr commented Jan 29, 2025

Please resolve the workflow failures, thx

@ahrtr
Copy link
Member

ahrtr commented Jan 29, 2025

@ivanvc @jmhbnz It looks like the workflow failure in pull-etcd-release-tests isn't caused by this PR. Could you please take a look?

I see that other PRs also fails.

@ivanvc
Copy link
Member

ivanvc commented Jan 29, 2025

@ivanvc @jmhbnz It looks like the workflow failure in pull-etcd-release-tests isn't caused by this PR. Could you please take a look?

I see that other PRs also fails.

I'm working on it. Yesterday the PR that enabled it was merged after I took off. It's marked as optional as it's still WIP. I'll remove the always run option to avoid flooding

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ahrtr, gangli113, siyuanfoundation

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ahrtr ahrtr merged commit 037de81 into etcd-io:main Jan 29, 2025
37 of 38 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants