-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 188
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
drude gpu sample fails CI #3104
Comments
3107: Fix failing grand_canonical sample test and add documentation to samples r=jngrad a=jonaslandsgesell This PR adds documentation in to the sample files: * widom_insertion.py * wang_landau_reaction_ensemble.py * grand_canonical.py * reaction_ensemble.py The PR also fixes partly #3104: The problem with the failing test was that the excess chemical potential did not match the submitted concentration. I now provide a matching pair of concentration and excess chemical potential. Co-authored-by: Jonas Landsgesell <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jean-Noël Grad <[email protected]>
Finally found the source of the error: bad P3M parameters from the tuning function. There seems to be a pattern in P3M parameters from simulations that crash: the make local_samples
cd testsuite/scripts/samples
sed -i "/system.actors.add(p3m)/i p3m._params = {'cao': 7, 'inter': 32768, 'r_cut': 2.5491526892051883, 'alpha': 1.286486160729783, 'accuracy': 0.0009884728050820963, 'mesh': [120, 120, 120], 'epsilon': 0.0, 'mesh_off': [0.5, 0.5, 0.5], 'tune': True, 'check_neutrality': True, 'prefactor': 1389.3612645, 'alpha_L': 47.67025070635568, 'r_cut_iL': 0.06879447050636864, 'cao_cut': [0.0, 0.0, 0.0], 'a': [0.0, 0.0, 0.0], 'ai': [0.0, 0.0, 0.0], 'inter2': 0, 'cao3': 0, 'additional_mesh': [0.0, 0.0, 0.0]}" local_samples/drude_bmimpf6.py
rm -f local_samples/drude_bmimpf6_gpu_processed.py; ../../../pypresso test_drude_bmimpf6_with_gpu.py The LJ sigmas are in the range 3.4-5.0, in simulations that don't crash the tuned P3M Note: checkpointing the particle positions/forces/velocities obtained from a bad tuning (i.e., the simulation eventually crashed) into a simulation with good P3M parameters doesn't lead to a crash. |
Do we have any theory why a low P3M |
closing in favor of #3842 |
Two samples have been randomly failing tests recently:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: