Handle user.name/system_cmdline if not present #42
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
lahsivjar
approved these changes
Jul 8, 2024
Yes, if we drop the document, no information about the process is there. With this, at least the user would know that a process with a particular pid is present in their system. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In some scenarios, we have observed that the user.name is not fetched since ots corresponding OTEL metric(process.owner) is not present.
But the absence of user.name leads to the process tab not working in Curated UI's. Hecne adding default value of "undefined" in case not present.
The same is done for system_cmdline for the same reasons