Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Security Solution] Updates codeowners file #164026

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 16, 2023

Conversation

MadameSheema
Copy link
Member

Summary

Originally security-engineering-productivity team as owning the x-pack/test/security_solution_cypress/ folder since all the configuration related to the FTR server and archives lived there.

After moving all the Cypress tests to that folder we missed updating the codeowners file to don't become a bottleneck on any small Cypress change. In this PR we are doing that by owning just those that might be relevant.

@MadameSheema MadameSheema added release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes Team: SecuritySolution Security Solutions Team working on SIEM, Endpoint, Timeline, Resolver, etc. v8.10.0 labels Aug 16, 2023
@MadameSheema MadameSheema self-assigned this Aug 16, 2023
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/security-solution (Team: SecuritySolution)

Copy link
Contributor

@PhilippeOberti PhilippeOberti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@MadameSheema MadameSheema enabled auto-merge (squash) August 16, 2023 09:59
Comment on lines +1286 to +1290
x-pack/test/security_solution_cypress/es_archives @elastic/security-engineering-productivity
x-pack/test/security_solution_cypress/cli_config.ts @elastic/security-engineering-productivity
x-pack/test/security_solution_cypress/config.ts @elastic/security-engineering-productivity
x-pack/test/security_solution_cypress/runner.ts @elastic/security-engineering-productivity
x-pack/test/security_solution_cypress/serverless_config.ts @elastic/security-engineering-productivity
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FWIW the reason why you were getting assigned as a code owners is because x-pack/test/security_solution_cypress @elastic/security-engineering-productivity was below team-specific cypress folders like /x-pack/plugins/security_solution/common/api/detection_engine/rule_exceptions @elastic/security-detection-engine in the CODEOWNERS file.

https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/managing-your-repositorys-settings-and-features/customizing-your-repository/about-code-owners#example-of-a-codeowners-file

# Order is important; the last matching pattern takes the most
# precedence. ...

We could also move up the x-pack/test/security_solution_cypress @elastic/security-engineering-productivity line so it's defined in the file above the team-specific folders. That way you'd own everything in x-pack/test/security_solution_cypress except the team-owned folders. Which I'm not sure is what you want.

@MadameSheema MadameSheema merged commit e78d617 into elastic:main Aug 16, 2023
@kibana-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

💛 Build succeeded, but was flaky

Failed CI Steps

Metrics [docs]

✅ unchanged

History

To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with:
@elasticmachine merge upstream

cc @MadameSheema

@kibanamachine kibanamachine added the backport:skip This commit does not require backporting label Aug 16, 2023
hop-dev pushed a commit to hop-dev/kibana that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2023
@MadameSheema MadameSheema deleted the updating-codeowners branch October 2, 2023 08:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport:skip This commit does not require backporting release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes Team: SecuritySolution Security Solutions Team working on SIEM, Endpoint, Timeline, Resolver, etc. v8.10.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants