Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Emphasize important difference between Kuery and Lucene query syntax #13592

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 18, 2017

Conversation

Bargs
Copy link
Contributor

@Bargs Bargs commented Aug 18, 2017

Fixes #13563

Brings additional attention to the fact that Kuery uses implicit ANDs whereas Lucene query syntax uses implicit ORs, which could confuse users if they're not aware of the difference.

@Bargs Bargs merged commit 9e48298 into elastic:master Aug 18, 2017
Bargs added a commit to Bargs/kibana that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2017
…lastic#13592)

Fixes elastic#13563

Brings additional attention to the fact that Kuery uses implicit ANDs whereas Lucene query syntax uses implicit ORs, which could confuse users if they're not aware of the difference.
Bargs added a commit to Bargs/kibana that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2017
…lastic#13592)

Fixes elastic#13563

Brings additional attention to the fact that Kuery uses implicit ANDs whereas Lucene query syntax uses implicit ORs, which could confuse users if they're not aware of the difference.
Bargs added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2017
…13592) (#13593)

Fixes #13563

Brings additional attention to the fact that Kuery uses implicit ANDs whereas Lucene query syntax uses implicit ORs, which could confuse users if they're not aware of the difference.
Bargs added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2017
…13592) (#13594)

Fixes #13563

Brings additional attention to the fact that Kuery uses implicit ANDs whereas Lucene query syntax uses implicit ORs, which could confuse users if they're not aware of the difference.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants