Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Minor DataStreamsUpgradeIT::testUpgradeDataStream improvements (#119144) #119169

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2024
Merged

Minor DataStreamsUpgradeIT::testUpgradeDataStream improvements (#119144) #119169

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2024

Conversation

masseyke
Copy link
Member

This is a collection of a few minor enhancements to DataStreamsUpgradeIT::testUpgradeDataStream:

  • It makes the number of rollovers (and therefore backing indices) random from 0-5
  • It adds a few additional assertions about the status response
  • It fixes a bug where the test would fail if it were running during an upgrade between minor versions (e.g. 9.0->9.1)

@masseyke masseyke added >test Issues or PRs that are addressing/adding tests backport :Data Management/Data streams Data streams and their lifecycles auto-merge-without-approval Automatically merge pull request when CI checks pass (NB doesn't wait for reviews!) v8.18.0 labels Dec 19, 2024
@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine merged commit fdc401e into elastic:8.x Dec 20, 2024
15 checks passed
@masseyke masseyke deleted the backport/8.x/pr-119144 branch December 20, 2024 00:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
auto-merge-without-approval Automatically merge pull request when CI checks pass (NB doesn't wait for reviews!) backport :Data Management/Data streams Data streams and their lifecycles >test Issues or PRs that are addressing/adding tests v8.18.0
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@masseyke @elasticsearchmachine