Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support the new SHAPE data type #185

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2019
Merged

Conversation

bpintea
Copy link
Collaborator

@bpintea bpintea commented Sep 30, 2019

This PR adds support for the new SHAPE data type. Supporting it
requires acceptance of the data type -- the type is mapped as a text
object (like the GEO_* types) and the driver treats it as an opaque text
field

The PR also updates the set of SQL functions the driver reports as
supported by Elasticsearch (as data source).

Relates to: elastic/elasticsearch#46464

This commit adds support for the new SHAPE data type. Supporting it
requires acceptance of the data type -- the type is mapped as a text
object (like the GEO_* types) and the driver treats it as an opaque text
field

The commit also updates the set of SQL functions the driver reports as
supported by Elasticsearch (as data source).
Copy link
Collaborator

@edsavage edsavage left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@bpintea bpintea merged commit 7b8b1dd into elastic:master Sep 30, 2019
@bpintea bpintea deleted the enh/shape_data_type branch September 30, 2019 20:39
bpintea added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2019
This commit adds support for the new SHAPE data type. Supporting it
requires acceptance of the data type -- the type is mapped as a text
object (like the GEO_* types) and the driver treats it as an opaque text
field

The commit also updates the set of SQL functions the driver reports as
supported by Elasticsearch (as data source).

(cherry picked from commit 7b8b1dd)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants