-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
22045 feature implement quarkus smoke test as prcheck #862
22045 feature implement quarkus smoke test as prcheck #862
Conversation
Docker image build succeeded: quay.io/eclipse/che-dashboard:pr-862 |
Docker image build succeeded: quay.io/eclipse/che-dashboard:pr-862 |
6acbe7f
to
1bb1229
Compare
Signed-off-by: Tibor Dancs (tdancs-dogfooding) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tibor Dancs (tdancs-dogfooding) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tibor Dancs (tdancs-dogfooding) <[email protected]>
1bb1229
to
b4aeaa9
Compare
Signed-off-by: Tibor Dancs (tdancs-dogfooding) <[email protected]>
b1090c6
to
d51cff9
Compare
Docker image build succeeded: quay.io/eclipse/che-dashboard:pr-862 |
3 similar comments
Docker image build succeeded: quay.io/eclipse/che-dashboard:pr-862 |
Docker image build succeeded: quay.io/eclipse/che-dashboard:pr-862 |
Docker image build succeeded: quay.io/eclipse/che-dashboard:pr-862 |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #862 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 81.59% 81.59%
=======================================
Files 347 347
Lines 35874 35874
Branches 2230 2230
=======================================
Hits 29271 29271
Misses 6581 6581
Partials 22 22
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
.ci/oci-dashboard-happy-path.sh
Outdated
|
||
export WORKDIR=${WORKDIR:-"${SCRIPT_DIR}/workdir"} | ||
export CHE_NAMESPACE=${CHE_NAMESPACE:-"eclipse-che"} | ||
export HAPPY_PATH_POD_NAME='happy-path-che' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cc: @dmytro-ndp is it ok to use happy-path naming or we should stick to smoke test
just want to avoid confusion in the scripts
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good catch, @ibuziuk
+1 to use smoke-test
naming, because it would help to avoid wrong expectations from test result
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I replaced it at as many places as I was able to confidently do.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
a few minor comments, happy path
naming works for me just want to make sure the rest of the team has no problem with this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
…s possible Signed-off-by: Tibor Dancs (tdancs-dogfooding) <[email protected]>
Docker image build succeeded: quay.io/eclipse/che-dashboard:pr-862 |
/retest |
2 similar comments
/retest |
/retest |
/test v11-dashboard-happy-path |
@ScrewTSW : what is the command to trigger smoke test manually in PR? |
@ScrewTSW : it would also be great to make sure PR image quay.io/eclipse/che-dashboard:pr-862 has been applied properly to testing Eclipse Che when run smoke test. |
that image doesn't get used at all. The test uses the image that's built locally on PROW-CI |
@ScrewTSW : thanks for explanation! I have actually found the way to check it - from events.log, e.g. https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/eclipse-che_che-dashboard/862/pull-ci-eclipse-che-che-dashboard-main-v11-dashboard-happy-path/1681793899066036224/artifacts/dashboard-happy-path/test/artifacts/eclipse-che-info/events.log
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Test PR check [1], [2] has correctly executed test steps from target issue [3].
Good job, @ScrewTSW !
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: akurinnoy, dmytro-ndp, ibuziuk, olexii4, ScrewTSW The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Build 3.9 :: dashboard_3.x/287: Console, Changes, Git Data |
Build 3.9 :: sync-to-downstream_3.x/3805: Console, Changes, Git Data |
Build 3.9 :: push-latest-container-to-quay_3.x/2752: Console, Changes, Git Data |
Build 3.9 :: get-sources-rhpkg-container-build_3.x/3654: dashboard : 3.x :: Build 54128396 : quay.io/devspaces/dashboard-rhel8:3.9-2 |
Build 3.9 :: dashboard_3.x/287: Upstream sync done; /DS_CI/sync-to-downstream_3.x/3805 triggered |
What does this PR do?
eclipse-che/che#22045
follow-up to #834
What issues does this PR fix or reference?
reference #834
Is it tested? How?
reference #834
Release Notes
N/A
Docs PR
N/A