Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automatic TypeObject representation registration for DynamicTypes [21057] #134

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 20, 2024

Conversation

richiware
Copy link
Member

@richiware richiware commented May 20, 2024

Description

Regeneration of IDL source code to compile against eProsima/Fast-DDS#4746

Contributor Checklist

  • Commit messages follow the project guidelines.
  • Changes do not break current interoperability.
  • N/A New feature has been documented/Current behavior is correctly described in the documentation.
  • N/A Applicable backports have been included in the description.

Reviewer Checklist

  • The PR has a milestone assigned.
  • The title and description correctly express the PR's purpose.
  • Check contributor checklist is correct.
  • CI passes without warnings or errors.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo González Moreno <[email protected]>
@richiware richiware changed the title Automatic TypeObject representation registration for DynamicTypes Automatic TypeObject representation registration for DynamicTypes [21057] May 20, 2024
@richiware
Copy link
Member Author

richiware commented May 20, 2024

✅ Passed manual ci

Copy link

@adriancampo adriancampo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@richiware richiware requested a review from adriancampo May 20, 2024 12:22
@richiware richiware merged commit f220474 into master May 20, 2024
4 of 6 checks passed
@richiware richiware deleted the feature/register_typeobject_w_dynamictype branch May 20, 2024 12:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants