-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 115
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[OTE-664] Change docker-compose to new syntax #2035
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes enhance the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
3ef1baf
to
59a2836
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- .github/workflows/protocol-benchmark.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/protocol-test.yml (1 hunks)
- protocol/Makefile (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- protocol/Makefile
Additional comments not posted (2)
.github/workflows/protocol-benchmark.yml (1)
31-33
: LGTM! Pruning Docker system is a good practice.The addition of the step to prune the Docker system before running benchmarks is a good practice to free up disk space and ensure a clean environment.
.github/workflows/protocol-test.yml (1)
108-110
: LGTM! Pruning Docker system is a good practice.The addition of the step to prune the Docker system before starting the localnet is a good practice to free up disk space and ensure a clean environment.
@@ -28,6 +28,9 @@ jobs: | |||
uses: actions/setup-go@v3 | |||
with: | |||
go-version: 1.22 | |||
- name: Prune Docker system to free up space | |||
run: | | |||
docker system prune -a --volumes -f |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Have you seen CI fail with disk space issues?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yea, the first PR with just the docker compose change actually triggered this, which is why I included prune
@Mergifyio backport release/protocol/v5.2.x |
https://github.com/Mergifyio backport release/protocol/v6.x |
✅ Backports have been created
|
✅ Backports have been created
|
(cherry picked from commit 6930857) # Conflicts: # .github/workflows/protocol-test.yml
(cherry picked from commit 6930857)
Co-authored-by: jerryfan01234 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: jerryfan01234 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: roy-dydx <[email protected]>
Changelist
changed docker-compose to docker compose in makefile
github deprecated v1 docker (actions/runner-images#9557) so
docker-compose
is no longer recognized during github auto reviews -> liveness test failingTest Plan
[Describe how this PR was tested (if applicable)]
Author/Reviewer Checklist
state-breaking
label.indexer-postgres-breaking
label.PrepareProposal
orProcessProposal
, manually add the labelproposal-breaking
.feature:[feature-name]
.backport/[branch-name]
.refactor
,chore
,bug
.Summary by CodeRabbit
docker compose
commands for local network management, enhancing clarity and maintainability.