We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature branch - https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/tree/features/UnsignedRightShift Specification - https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/main/proposals/csharp-11.0/unsigned-right-shift-operator.md Proposal: dotnet/csharplang#4682
TestBinaryOperators_UnsignedRightShift
>>>
BuiltIn_Lifted_ExpressionTree_*
>>>=
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Support parsing for Unsigned Right Shift operator (#60501)
6ab2107
https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/main/proposals/unsigned-right-shift-operator.md Test plan #60433
Code Lens and Call Hierarchy behave like any other operator; not worth adding explicit tests in those cases.
Sorry, something went wrong.
And the discussed fix for how we handle the parse ambiguity: #60789
@333fred IDE looks good, I don't see any remaining work here.
333fred
No branches or pull requests
Feature branch - https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/tree/features/UnsignedRightShift
Specification - https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/main/proposals/csharp-11.0/unsigned-right-shift-operator.md
Proposal: dotnet/csharplang#4682
Compiler
Public APIs
TestBinaryOperators_UnsignedRightShift
>>>
operatorParsing
Semantics
BuiltIn_Lifted_ExpressionTree_*
)Productivity
>>>
and>>>=
- tests are in place, need to add actual doc pages>>>
operator>>>
token classificationThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: