Improve Comparison::CONTAINS: allow to use the SQL wildcard characters

[Fedik]

This pull additional to doctrine/orm#1150
And allow to use the SQL wildcard characters % and _ for Comparison::CONTAINS

Allow to build the contains expressions like:

Criteria::expr()->contains('myField', 'some string%');
Criteria::expr()->contains('myField', '%some string');
Criteria::expr()->contains('myField', '%10\%'); // search for 10% at end of the string
Criteria::expr()->contains('myField', 's_m_ string');

Note: this changes can make b/c issue for existing Comparison::CONTAINS expressions, when someone use not escaped %, _ .

[stof]

I'm -1 for this:

• it makes the API harder to use
• it is a BC break

If we want wilcard support, the only way is to uuse a new operator. We cannot change existing ones

[Fedik]

I agree, that a new operator would be a better solution,
but my knowledge not enough to do that, so I did what I can ...

[Ocramius]

This is probably an actual like/ilike operator to be introduced

[Ocramius]

This API is uncovered by tests

[Fedik]

@Ocramius I think if like/notlike #50 will be accepted then current issue can be closed ...
I keep it open as get not to much feedback about like/notlike

[stof]

The current issue cannot be closed even if #50 is accepted. this PR is about fixing a bug in the current implementation, where the SQL generated for CONTAINS is not consistent with the behavior of Doctrine Common.

[Ocramius]

Thanks for clearing that up, @stof - missed that part completely while
responding to the issue today.

Marco Pivetta

http://twitter.com/Ocramius

http://ocramius.github.com/

On 22 January 2015 at 11:38, Christophe Coevoet [email protected]
wrote:

The current issue cannot be closed even if #50
#50 is accepted. this PR is
about fixing a bug in the current implementation, where the SQL
generated for CONTAINS is not consistent with the behavior of Doctrine
Common.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#45 (comment).

[Fedik]

@stof I thought doctrine/orm#1150 about SQL .. (where you told about unescaped value)