Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Aarch64 rpm support #71

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2018
Merged

Aarch64 rpm support #71

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2018

Conversation

ZeuAlex
Copy link
Contributor

@ZeuAlex ZeuAlex commented Dec 14, 2017

Like #25 and #35, this PR extends aarch64 support with RPMs builds.
I'm currently using the rpm package on fedora 27 with RPi 3.

Copy link
Contributor

@seemethere seemethere left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, can confirm this built everything correctly. Going to wait on a merge until we can get another review from product.

@seemethere
Copy link
Contributor

ping @friism

@ericcurtin
Copy link

This built fine for me too! Any updates on the status of this PR?

Copy link
Contributor

@andrewhsu andrewhsu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@seemethere seemethere merged commit 4cc70e4 into docker:master Jan 18, 2018
@ZeuAlex
Copy link
Contributor Author

ZeuAlex commented Jan 22, 2018

Thx guys ! You rock !! 🚀

@justinclift
Copy link
Contributor

justinclift commented Aug 2, 2018

On a somewhat related note, Docker CE 18.06.0-3 compiles ok on CentOS under armv7hl. Tested using a Scaleway C1 server (a super cheap 4 core armv7hl thing).

It needed a newer version of Go than the CentOS 7 supplied 1.9.4 (errors out during the build otherwise), and Go 1.11beta2 seems to work ok.

The resulting package installs fine, and docker-containerd seems to run. Haven't yet done further testing of it, as this was more just an initial experiment. 😉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants