Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Unit test resource #44

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Feb 23, 2022
Merged

Unit test resource #44

merged 10 commits into from
Feb 23, 2022

Conversation

abhi16394
Copy link
Collaborator

@abhi16394 abhi16394 commented Feb 23, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Description

  • Added unit-tests for resources

GitHub Issues

List the GitHub issues impacted by this PR:

GitHub Issue #
dell/csm#159

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code to ensure there are no formatting, vetting, linting, or security issues
  • I have verified that new and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have not allowed coverage numbers to degenerate
  • I have maintained at least 90% code coverage
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have maintained backward compatibility

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • Test A
  • Test B

@abhi16394 abhi16394 merged commit 3cd3c74 into main Feb 23, 2022
@rensyct rensyct deleted the unit-test-resource branch July 18, 2022 12:17
ChristianAtDell added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
@ChristianAtDell
Unit test resource (#44)
810f0c5 
* Adding unit-test for resources

* Addig csidriver tests

* Adding status column

* Adding status column

* fix formatting issue

* merge

* Fixing unit-test

* Fix driver-test
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@bharathsreekanth bharathsreekanth bharathsreekanth approved these changes

@nb950 nb950 nb950 approved these changes

@alikdell alikdell Awaiting requested review from alikdell alikdell is a code owner

@bandak2 bandak2 Awaiting requested review from bandak2 bandak2 is a code owner

@coulof coulof Awaiting requested review from coulof coulof is a code owner

@gallacher gallacher Awaiting requested review from gallacher gallacher is a code owner

@JacobGros JacobGros Awaiting requested review from JacobGros JacobGros is a code owner

@jooseppi-luna jooseppi-luna Awaiting requested review from jooseppi-luna jooseppi-luna is a code owner

@karthikk92 karthikk92 Awaiting requested review from karthikk92 karthikk92 is a code owner

@mjsdell mjsdell Awaiting requested review from mjsdell mjsdell is a code owner

@medegw01 medegw01 Awaiting requested review from medegw01

@panigs7 panigs7 Awaiting requested review from panigs7 panigs7 is a code owner

@prasar6 prasar6 Awaiting requested review from prasar6

@rajendraindukuri rajendraindukuri Awaiting requested review from rajendraindukuri rajendraindukuri is a code owner

@rensyct rensyct Awaiting requested review from rensyct

@tdawe tdawe Awaiting requested review from tdawe tdawe is a code owner

@yifeijin yifeijin Awaiting requested review from yifeijin

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@abhi16394 @nb950 @bharathsreekanth