-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 516
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(pt): lower the atol for dpa2 test #3785
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent changes focus on adjusting the tolerance levels in the Changes
Recent Review DetailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (2)
Additional comments not posted (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## devel #3785 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 82.49% 81.35% -1.14%
==========================================
Files 515 515
Lines 48642 48620 -22
Branches 2980 2969 -11
==========================================
- Hits 40126 39555 -571
- Misses 7605 8105 +500
- Partials 911 960 +49 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Opened an issue about this: deepmodeling#3786 <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Bug Fixes** - Adjusted tolerance values to improve the precision consistency for specific tests. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Opened an issue about this: #3786
Summary by CodeRabbit