Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes Merge "INTO" for delete from syntax #129

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 9, 2024

Conversation

sundarshankar89
Copy link
Collaborator

Closes #118

@sundarshankar89 sundarshankar89 added the bug Something isn't working label Feb 9, 2024
@sundarshankar89 sundarshankar89 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 9, 2024 04:28
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (9195ce7) 90.54% compared to head (031e376) 92.22%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #129      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.54%   92.22%   +1.68%     
==========================================
  Files          13       13              
  Lines         888      888              
  Branches      156      156              
==========================================
+ Hits          804      819      +15     
+ Misses         60       44      -16     
- Partials       24       25       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@ganeshdogiparthi-db ganeshdogiparthi-db left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@sundarshankar89 sundarshankar89 added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 9, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 2e4fd29 Feb 9, 2024
6 checks passed
@sundarshankar89 sundarshankar89 deleted the patch/merge_into_118 branch February 9, 2024 05:51
sundarshankar89 added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2024
* Added support for WITHIN GROUP for ARRAY_AGG and LISTAGG functions ([#133](#133)).
* Fixed Merge "INTO" for delete from syntax ([#129](#129)).
* Fixed `DATE TRUNC` parse errors ([#131](#131)).
* Patched Logger function call during wheel file ([#135](#135)).
* Patched extra call to root path ([#126](#126)).

Dependency updates:

 * Updated databricks-sdk requirement from ~=0.18.0 to >=0.18,<0.20 ([#134](#134)).
@sundarshankar89 sundarshankar89 mentioned this pull request Feb 15, 2024
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2024
* Added support for WITHIN GROUP for ARRAY_AGG and LISTAGG functions
([#133](#133)).
* Fixed Merge "INTO" for delete from syntax
([#129](#129)).
* Fixed `DATE TRUNC` parse errors
([#131](#131)).
* Patched Logger function call during wheel file
([#135](#135)).
* Patched extra call to root path
([#126](#126)).

Dependency updates:

* Updated databricks-sdk requirement from ~=0.18.0 to >=0.18,<0.20
([#134](#134)).
sundarshankar89 added a commit to sundarshankar89/remorph that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2025
sundarshankar89 added a commit to sundarshankar89/remorph that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2025
sundarshankar89 added a commit to sundarshankar89/remorph that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2025
* Added support for WITHIN GROUP for ARRAY_AGG and LISTAGG functions
([databrickslabs#133](databrickslabs#133)).
* Fixed Merge "INTO" for delete from syntax
([databrickslabs#129](databrickslabs#129)).
* Fixed `DATE TRUNC` parse errors
([databrickslabs#131](databrickslabs#131)).
* Patched Logger function call during wheel file
([databrickslabs#135](databrickslabs#135)).
* Patched extra call to root path
([databrickslabs#126](databrickslabs#126)).

Dependency updates:

* Updated databricks-sdk requirement from ~=0.18.0 to >=0.18,<0.20
([databrickslabs#134](databrickslabs#134)).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Missing "INTO" for "MERGE INTO" translation
2 participants