no longer write the dartdoc version into generated html files

[devoncarew]

• no longer write the dartdoc version into generated html files
• fully or partially alleviate issues rolling the latest dartdoc into google3 #3562

---

• I’ve reviewed the contributor guide and applied the relevant portions to this PR.

Contribution guidelines:

• See our contributor guide for general expectations for PRs.
• Larger or significant changes should be discussed in an issue before creating a PR.
• Contributions to our repos should follow the Dart style guide and use dart format.
• Most changes should add an entry to the changelog and may need to rev the pubspec package version.
• Changes to packages require corresponding tests.

Note that many Dart repos have a weekly cadence for reviewing PRs - please allow for some latency before initial review feedback.

[kevmoo]

If we're going to mess with this, would it be better to be a bit less cute and a bit more helpful

Either point to the pub.dev page or github repo?

[kallentu]

I'm good with these changes, but was there a reason that we were doing this in the first place?

[devoncarew]

If we're going to mess with this, would it be better to be a bit less cute and a bit more helpful Either point to the pub.dev page or github repo?

I think we could just remove this line entirely honestly:

<meta name="generator" content="made with love by dartdoc"

I'm good with these changes, but was there a reason that we were doing this in the first place?

I think this is purely historical and not for any particular use case; @srawlins or @keertip may know more.

[parlough]

I imagine the original idea was to quickly identify what version of dartdoc a site was generated with in case there are any issues to report or track down.

I think it's probably fine to drop the entire metadata though. I've never ended up using it :P

[devoncarew]

FYI, I updated this PR to remove the 'made with dartdoc' html comment entirely.