-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 616
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cancel in progress workflows on new commit #6759
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f93dd06
chore: cancel in progress workflows on new commit
chatton f690505
chore: add workflow for wasm tests
chatton 60e1a7a
add concurrency for e2e-fork.
DimitrisJim f5629fb
Merge branch 'main' into cian/cancel-in-progress-workflows
chatton 624fefe
Merge branch 'main' into cian/cancel-in-progress-workflows
chatton File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -17,6 +17,11 @@ on: | |
# trigger workflow if PR is marked ready for review. | ||
- ready_for_review | ||
|
||
# cancel workflows if a new one is triggered on the same branch. | ||
concurrency: | ||
group: ${{ github.ref }} | ||
cancel-in-progress: ${{ github.ref != 'refs/heads/main' }} | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. cancels if not on main, right? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. yep this is my understanding of it, we will leave the ones that run on main alone |
||
|
||
jobs: | ||
# determine-image-tag will either output the PR number e.g. pr-1234 or the string main. | ||
# this will be used to tag the images that are built during the workflow. | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we want to group by workflow just in case? https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-jobs/using-concurrency#example-using-concurrency-and-the-default-behavior
I don't think this would have any tangible diff, though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we don't need to right? I think it's fair to say that if we push a new commit we want to cancel everything that was running and just re-run them from scratch with the new code