fix: Possibly helpful attempt at gogo

[faddat]

Description

Closes: #XXXX

Hi Robert, I'm sending this one because I think that it might be helpful. It may also be not useful much at all.

It is the result of my work to try and get Go workspaces going.

I figured that I might as well make this PR, since the gogo work really turned out to be very difficult and thought maybe this would be helpful. Right now the only clear issue is the type definitron for the Inteface Registry.

Cheers

-Jacob

---

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

• included the correct type prefix in the PR title
• added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
• provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
• followed the guidelines for building modules
• included the necessary unit and integration tests
• added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
• included comments for documenting Go code
• updated the relevant documentation or specification
• reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
• confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

• confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
• confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
• reviewed state machine logic
• reviewed API design and naming
• reviewed documentation is accurate
• reviewed tests and test coverage
• manually tested (if applicable)

[nghuyenthevinh2000]

I have looked into the problem of Inteface Registry and has changed gateway JSONPb to use correct cosmos proto types at here:
https://github.com/notional-labs/gateway/tree/cosmos-gogo

[faddat]

Thanks Vinh! I'll see if this works better now-- it's key to getting workspaces for this repo

[faddat]

@nghuyenthevinh2000 fyi, I am going to merge @robert-zaremba's recent work into this, favoring his, and then I'm going to merge master in

I don't know if it is the right path, but I'd love to ship workspaces and build without containers (buf only) for 46.

Would be really useful for craft.

Ah, so, seems that Robert's branch has the same issue with the interface registry. I am going to merge yours into his. Can you please make a PR to the cosmos/gateway repo?

[nghuyenthevinh2000]

there is no such cosmos/gateway repo

for me

[faddat]

oops, wonder where I went wrong here

[faddat]

@nghuyenthevinh2000 I merged master here, to see which ci checks still fail

[robert-zaremba]

I think we should keep "google.golang.org/protobuf/proto" and rollback that changes.

[robert-zaremba]

why this replace?

[faddat]

pbjson typing

[faddat]

sorry what I mean is:

this one was very important, it keeps the interface registry from exploding.

[robert-zaremba]

What do you mean? Can you link an issue? we specifically want to avoid replace.