[WIP] Runc v1.0.0-rc91 fixes #6898
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Bumps [github.com/containers/common](https://github.com/containers/common) from 0.15.1 to 0.15.2. - [Release notes](https://github.com/containers/common/releases) - [Commits](containers/common@v0.15.1...v0.15.2) JJG: Pin Runc to v1.0.0-rc90 with replace until we can fix compilation w/ buildah Signed-off-by: dependabot-preview[bot] <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Joseph Gooch <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Gooch <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Gooch <[email protected]>
|
/hold |
|
Replaced with #6906 |
github-actions
bot
added
the
locked - please file new issue/PR
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Building off of #6897 , bumps the rev up to RC91, and then fixes things.
Two of the commits actually depend in Buildah, the other two are proper here. The PR would look less scary if it were properly based on #6897's branch but it's in my repo so I don't think it would look right.
Consider after 6897 is merged.
/hold