Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update common, image, and storage deps #18510

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented May 9, 2023

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
github.com/containers/common require digest 586a3be -> 6eebb37
github.com/containers/image/v5 require digest 07ced61 -> dc6d2c8
github.com/containers/storage require digest cc0d208 -> 73f2995

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 11am" in timezone UTC, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Never, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file release-note-none labels May 9, 2023
@vrothberg vrothberg added the bloat_approved Approve a PR in which binary file size grows by over 50k label May 9, 2023
Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bloat LGTM, it's just a lot of new code.

@giuseppe @Luap99 PTAL

I restarted the flaked jobs.

Copy link
Member

@giuseppe giuseppe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 9, 2023
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented May 9, 2023

/approve
/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 9, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 9, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 9, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: giuseppe, renovate[bot], rhatdan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Restarted flaked job

go.mod Outdated
github.com/containers/conmon v2.0.20+incompatible
github.com/containers/image/v5 v5.25.1-0.20230505072505-dc4a4be9cc1e
github.com/containers/libhvee v0.0.5
github.com/containers/ocicrypt v1.1.7
github.com/containers/psgo v1.8.0
github.com/containers/storage v1.46.1
github.com/containers/storage v1.46.2-0.20230508110141-51c23d59f8f3
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The Debian job keeps failing. @nalind could something in storage have caused the jobs to fail? Curious that it only happens on Debian.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It doesn't appear to be interacting well with the version of buildah in the VM (1.28.2), though I can't trigger the same error when I run relevant specific integration test scripts in a manually-started VM.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nalind Do we have to update the buildah version in the debian VM ?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we know which version that is?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No I am not sure about it, @cevich Could help us in confirming the version of buildah in debian VM

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can always use hack/get_ci_vm.sh to check and reproduce if needed.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is, in fact, how I manually started the VM in which I wasn't able to reproduce the issue.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok this is very weird then.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's 1.28.2+ds1-1+b3 in the c20230426t140447z-f38f37d12 image. I've got a fresh set of images building as I write this in case it helps.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just checked the new image as it was building. It has a slightly newer 1.28.2+ds1-3.

@flouthoc
Copy link
Collaborator

Restarted test.

cevich added a commit to cevich/podman that referenced this pull request May 17, 2023
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update github.com/containers/common digest to 8d47831 fix(deps): update common, image, and storage deps Jun 6, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/common-image-and-storage-deps branch from 0af4285 to 25b7d75 Compare June 6, 2023 14:39
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 6, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 6, 2023

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update common, image, and storage deps fix(deps): update common, image, and storage deps Jun 13, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/common-image-and-storage-deps branch from 59bf47d to c4d488c Compare June 13, 2023 11:34
@Luap99 Luap99 removed the bloat_approved Approve a PR in which binary file size grows by over 50k label Jun 13, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 16, 2023
@cevich
Copy link
Member

cevich commented Jun 16, 2023

PR needs rebase.

okay, I checked the "renovate please rebase this" button.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/common-image-and-storage-deps branch from c4d488c to 0fbd593 Compare June 16, 2023 19:38
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 16, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/common-image-and-storage-deps branch from 0fbd593 to 5c8ac9d Compare June 21, 2023 12:50
Signed-off-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/common-image-and-storage-deps branch from 5c8ac9d to b32a5cc Compare June 23, 2023 09:20
@Luap99
Copy link
Member

Luap99 commented Jun 23, 2023

Tests are breaking here!

I did a brief skim and apart from flakes one common factor seems to be a missing Storing signatures in push output.
Did containers/image#2001 remove this output, @mtrmac? Do we have to fixup all tests?

@mtrmac
Copy link
Collaborator

mtrmac commented Jun 23, 2023

Yes, c/image is now not saying Storing signatures if there are no signatures to store.

It’s a purely aesthetic thing, so if this were a deadline blocker or something, I’m fine with temporarily reverting that.

OTOH I do think it’s a move in the right direction overall, so past the immediate short-term concerns I’d prefer the tests to be updated if they expect that output.

Do you need me to help with the test update?

@Luap99
Copy link
Member

Luap99 commented Jun 26, 2023

If fixing the test is the right thing then I can do it, I just wanted an ack from you.

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jun 26, 2023

I believe the tests should be fixed.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 29, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update common, image, and storage deps fix(deps): update common, image, and storage deps - autoclosed Jun 29, 2023
@renovate renovate bot closed this Jun 29, 2023
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/common-image-and-storage-deps branch June 29, 2023 07:22
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update common, image, and storage deps - autoclosed fix(deps): update common, image, and storage deps Jun 29, 2023
@renovate renovate bot reopened this Jun 29, 2023
@renovate renovate bot restored the renovate/common-image-and-storage-deps branch June 29, 2023 21:04
@rhatdan rhatdan closed this Jun 30, 2023
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/common-image-and-storage-deps branch July 1, 2023 10:39
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 29, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 29, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants