Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CI:DOCS] CI: sanity check for desired runtime #14912

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 12, 2022

Conversation

edsantiago
Copy link
Member

We're still not testing runc in CI (#14833), and it may be weeks
or months before we can, due to criu/glibc nightmare, but one day
we'll be back on track, then later on we'll update VMs again,
and screw it up, and lose runc, and not notice, and RHEL will
break, and oh noes headless chicken again, repeat repeat.

We can do better. Use .cirrus.yml to explicitly define which
VMs should use which runtimes, and enforce it early in the
CI build step. This should never fail (uh huh) in a PR,
only in one of the update-VM PRs.

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago [email protected]

None

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 12, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: edsantiago

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 12, 2022
We're still not testing runc in CI (containers#14833), and it may be weeks
or months before we can, due to criu/glibc nightmare, but one day
we'll be back on track, then later on we'll update VMs again,
and screw it up, and lose runc, and not notice, and RHEL will
break, and oh noes headless chicken again, repeat repeat.

We can do better. Use .cirrus.yml to explicitly define which
VMs should use which runtimes, and enforce it early in the
CI build step. This should never fail (uh huh) in a PR,
only in one of the update-VM PRs.

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <[email protected]>
@edsantiago edsantiago force-pushed the ci_confirm_runtime branch from 251d244 to da8c6a8 Compare July 12, 2022 14:47
Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

automation_task needs some love

@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

LGTM
and happy green test buttons.

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jul 12, 2022

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 12, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot merged commit 587807b into containers:main Jul 12, 2022
@edsantiago edsantiago deleted the ci_confirm_runtime branch July 12, 2022 20:21
edsantiago added a commit to edsantiago/libpod that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2022
We have CI tests running in netavark mode when CNI is desired.
Add a new .cirrus.yml envariable, CI_DESIRED_NETWORK, which
we then force-check in e2e and system tests. Simple copy/paste
of containers#14912 (the RUNTIME check) with manual s/RUNTIME/NETWORK/
and other minor changes.

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <[email protected]>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 21, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 21, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants