Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix images since/after tests #13239

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 16, 2022

Conversation

baude
Copy link
Member

@baude baude commented Feb 15, 2022

For the since and after imagve filter tests, instead of using the
read-only cache of images, we just use the empty r/w store. We then
build three images that are strictly predictable.

Signed-off-by: Brent Baude [email protected]

For the since and after imagve filter tests, instead of using the
read-only cache of images, we just use the empty r/w store.  We then
build three images that are strictly predictable.

Signed-off-by: Brent Baude <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 15, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: baude

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 15, 2022
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we combine both tests into one since they do basically the same.

It looks like some descriptions have changed on the docker registry
where we had been searching for images that include 'alpine'.  We are
now seeing an image in the initial list that has 'alpine' in its
description.

Signed-off-by: Brent Baude <[email protected]>
@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Feb 15, 2022

Combining SGTM. Otherwise, LGTM

@baude
Copy link
Member Author

baude commented Feb 16, 2022

merge me

Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 16, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 98962a2 into containers:main Feb 16, 2022
@vrothberg
Copy link
Member

Opened #13244 to merge the two tests.

@cevich
Copy link
Member

cevich commented Feb 18, 2022

Looks like this needs to be backported to v3.3.1-rhel, v3.4.2-rhel, and v3.4?

@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 21, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 21, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants