Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

support health checks from image configs #12239

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 9, 2021

Conversation

vrothberg
Copy link
Member

Health checks may be defined in the container config or the config of an
image. So far, Podman only looked at the container config.

The plumbing happened in libimage but add a regression test to Podman as
well to make sure the glue code will not regress.

Fixes: #12226
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg [email protected]

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 9, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vrothberg

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 9, 2021
@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

@rhatdan PTAL

Health checks may be defined in the container config or the config of an
image.  So far, Podman only looked at the container config.

The plumbing happened in libimage but add a regression test to Podman as
well to make sure the glue code will not regress.

Note that I am pinning github.com/onsi/gomega to v1.16.0 since v1.17.0
requires go 1.16 which in turn is breaking CI.

Fixes: containers#12226
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <[email protected]>
@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Nov 9, 2021

LGTM

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Nov 9, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 9, 2021
@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 9, 2021
@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 9, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit ad4366a into containers:main Nov 9, 2021
@vrothberg vrothberg deleted the fix-12226 branch November 9, 2021 15:58
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 22, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 22, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Missing healthcheck defined in image
5 participants