Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

runtime: move pause process to scope #11606

Conversation

giuseppe
Copy link
Member

make sure the pause process is moved to its own scope as well as what we do when we join an existing user+mount namespace.

Closes: #11560

[NO TESTS NEEDED]

Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano [email protected]

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 16, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: giuseppe

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 16, 2021
@giuseppe giuseppe force-pushed the always-move-pause-process-to-scope branch 2 times, most recently from b460c9c to a39efca Compare September 16, 2021 13:18
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Sep 16, 2021

LGTM
@Luap99 @mheon @baude PTAL
@containers/podman-maintainers PTAL

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Sep 16, 2021

/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 16, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 16, 2021
we already know the path to the pause PID file, no need to calculate
it again.

Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <[email protected]>
when running on a systemd with systemd, always try to move the pause
process to its own scope.

Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <[email protected]>
make sure the pause process is moved to its own scope as well as what
we do when we join an existing user+mount namespace.

Closes: containers#11560

[NO TESTS NEEDED]

Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <[email protected]>
@giuseppe giuseppe force-pushed the always-move-pause-process-to-scope branch from a39efca to a2c8b5d Compare September 16, 2021 18:17
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 16, 2021
@flouthoc
Copy link
Collaborator

LGTM

@giuseppe
Copy link
Member Author

@flouthoc could you add a /lgtm?

@flouthoc
Copy link
Collaborator

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 17, 2021
@flouthoc
Copy link
Collaborator

@Luap99 Could you do a lgtm please. Folks in owner list can approve.

@giuseppe
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 17, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 84c61b7 into containers:main Sep 17, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 22, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 22, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

possible solution for podman pause process that keeps running after user logout
5 participants