-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
runtime: move pause process to scope #11606
runtime: move pause process to scope #11606
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: giuseppe The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
b460c9c
to
a39efca
Compare
/lgtm |
we already know the path to the pause PID file, no need to calculate it again. Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <[email protected]>
when running on a systemd with systemd, always try to move the pause process to its own scope. Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <[email protected]>
make sure the pause process is moved to its own scope as well as what we do when we join an existing user+mount namespace. Closes: containers#11560 [NO TESTS NEEDED] Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <[email protected]>
a39efca
to
a2c8b5d
Compare
LGTM |
@flouthoc could you add a /lgtm? |
/lgtm |
@Luap99 Could you do a |
/hold cancel |
make sure the pause process is moved to its own scope as well as what we do when we join an existing user+mount namespace.
Closes: #11560
[NO TESTS NEEDED]
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano [email protected]